Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:14:26.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non‐Political Caretaker Administrations and Democratic Elections in Bangladesh: An Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Habib Zafarullah  and
Muhammad Yeahia Akhter
Habib Zafarullah
Affiliation:
Teaches political science and public policy at the University of New England, Australia
Muhammad Yeahia Akhter
Affiliation:
Teaches political science at the University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The transition to democracy in bangladesh after the overthrow of the authoritarian regime in 1990 began with the formation of a non-political caretaker administration (NCA) to prepare the ground for the transfer of power to a popularly mandated government. Its other important purpose was to manage the affairs of the state during the interlude that separated the dissolution of the authoritarian regime (December 1990) and the complete installation of the democratically-elected government (September 1991) to rule the country in its own right.

The need for this NCA was imperative in the wake of the dismantling of authoritarian rule. The attempts of the ousted regime to conduct a third election, while still in power, were not acceptable to its political adversaries, given the former's proven tendency to unduly inf luence the electoral process in the past.

Type
Original Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 2000 , pp. 345 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The regime arranged one election in 1986 and another in 1988. The party it had ousted from power in March 1982 boycotted both. The other major opposition party participated in the first one but refrained from doing so in the second. The regime-sponsored Jatiya Party (JP) heavily rigged both elections. For details on these elections, see Huque, Ahmed S. and Hakim, Muhammad A., ‘Elections in Bangladesh: Tools of Legitimacy’, Asian Affairs: An American Review, 19:4 (1993), pp. 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Habib Zafarullah and M. Yeahia Akhter, ‘Military Rule, Civilianization and Electoral Corruption: Pakistan and Bangladesh in Perspective’, Unpublished Paper, 1997.

3 Shain, Yossi and Linz, Juan, Between States: Interim Governments and Democratic Governance, London, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 US Department of State, Bangladesh Human Rights Practices, Washington DC, USDS, 1991.Google Scholar

5 Khan, Shamsul et al., Political Culture, Political Parties and the Democratie Transition in Bangladesh, Dhaka, Academie Publishers, 1996, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar

6 Ahmed, Emajuddin, ‘The Military and Democracy in Bangladesh’, May, in R. J. and Selochan, Viberto(eds), The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific, Bathurst, Crawford, 1998, pp. 102–3.Google Scholar

7 Khan et al., op. cit., pp. 24–7.

8 Huque and Hakim, op. cit., pp. 248–61.

9 Hakim, Muhammad A., Bangladesh Politics: The Shahabuddin Interregnum, Dhaka, University Press Limited, p. 24.Google Scholar

10 M. Yeahia Akhter, Elections and Electoral Corruption in Bangladesh, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, 1999.

11 Ahmed, op. cit., p. 116.

12 Rosenbaum, Walter, Political Culture, New York, Praeger, 1975, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar

13 Zafarullah, Habib, ‘Consolidating Democratic Governance: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’, Alauddin, in Mohammad and Hasan, Samiul (eds), Development, Governance and the Environment in South Asia: A Focus on Bangladesh, London, Macmillan, 1999, pp. 185–92Google Scholar.

14 Alam, Quamrul, ‘The State: Weak and Fragmented’, Zafarullah, in Habib (ed.), The Zia Episode in Bangladesh Politics, New Delhi, South Asia Publishers, 1996, p. 55.Google Scholar

15 Keesing, , Record of World Events, 36:12 (1990)Google Scholar, Bethesda, MD, Keesing’s Worldwide, LLC, p. 37907.

16 Timm, R. W. and Gain, Philip (eds), Fifth National Parliamentary Election 1991: Observation Report (Bengali version), Dhaka, Coordinating Council for Human Rights in Bangladesh, 1991, p. 62.Google Scholar

17 Hakim, op. cit., p. 51; Inquilab, 2 January 1991.

18 Bangladesh Observer, 19 January 1991.

19 Khan, Mohammad M. and Husain, Syed A, ‘Process of Democratization in Bangladesh’, Contemporary South Asia, 5:3 (1996), pp. 325–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Inquilab, 10 January 1991; Quadir, Fahimul, ‘Jatiya Sangsad Elections 1991: A Survey’ (in Bengali), Journal of Human Development, 3:4 (1991), p. 53.Google Scholar

21 For analyses of party manifestos, see Baxter, Craig, ‘Bangladesh in 1991: A Parliamentary System’, Asian Survey, 32:2 (1992), p. 163;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hakim, Muhammad A., ‘The 1991 Parliamentary Elections in Bangladesh: A Review’, Politics Administration and Change, 17 (Jul.-Dec. 1991), pp. 30–1.Google Scholar

22 Commonwealth Observer Group, Parliamentary Elections in Bangladesh, London, Commonwealth Secretariat, 1991, pp. 16–18Google Scholar.

23 Timm and Gain, op. cit., p. 68.

24 Teams came from the United States, Britain, Japan, Malaysia and the European Community. There was also a team representing the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation and several local NGOs, which monitored the polls.

25 There was, however, sporadic violence in some parts of the country. Voting was postponed in some constituencies where the situation went beyond the control of the election and law-enforcing personnel and inter-party violence claimed the lives of several people. The NCA reacted sharply to these incidents and promptly suspended five local councils for their failure to maintain law and order. Timm and Gain, op. cit., p. 70.

26 Before the 12th Amendment Bill introducing the parliamentary system was enacted, another Act was passed enabling the acting president to return to the Supreme Court as the Chief Justice. It was a special arrangement made at the personal request of Justice Ahmed.

27 Zafarullah, op. cit.; Blair, Harry et al., The Bangladesh Democracy Program Assessment: Final Report, Washington, DC, Bureau for Asia, 1992, p. 37.Google Scholar

28 The BNP had won nearly 50 per cent of the popular vote in the 1991 elections in the metropolitan areas but it was able to secure only 39 per cent in the 1994 city corporation polls. In contrast, the AL’s vote surged from 34 to 42 per cent.

29 Hakim, Muhammad A., ‘The Mirpur Parliamentary By-Election in Bangladesh’, Asian Survey, 34:8 (1994), pp. 738–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Rashiduzzaman, M., ‘Political Unrest and Democracy in Bangladesh’, Asian Survey, 37:3 (1997), pp. 254–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Kochanek, Stanley A., ‘Bangladesh in 1996: the 25th Year of Independence’, Asian Survey, 37:2 (1997), p. 137;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Rashiduzzaman, op. cit., pp. 259–60.

32 According to this model, the incumbent prime minister and the cabinet would resign with the announcement of the election schedules by the EC following the dissolution of parliament by the president. He would then appoint a new prime minister either from among the judges of the SC Appellate Division (AD) or a retiredjudge of the AD or a neutral non-partisan person to head the NCA. The caretaker prime minister, acting as the chief executive of the government under Article 55 of the constitution, would form a cabinet with persons known for their neutrality, i.e., they would not be members of any political party and, like the head of the NCA, would be debarred from standing as candidates in the parliamentary elections. The main responsibility of the NCA would be to ensure free and fair elections and it would perform only emergency and routine state functions as envisaged in the constitution. The new parliament would legalize this arrangement by amending the constitution, providing for an NCA to conduct at least three parliamentary elections in future. Inquilab, 29 June 1994.

33 The BNP model proposed an interim national government to supervise the elections. It was to consist of a cabinet of ten members of parliament, equally representing the government and the opposition, to be headed by the incumbent prime minister.

34 According to their new formula the president, in consultation with the prime minister and the leader of the opposition, would appoint an impartial person, either a sitting SC judge, a retiredjudge or any dignified person acceptable to both sides, as head of the NCA. Half of the ten non-partisan members of the ‘cabinet’ would be nominated by the prime minister and the other half by the opposition leader.

35 Kochanek, op. cit., p. 137.

36 Government of Bangladesh, The Thirteenth Constitutional Amendment Act, Dhaka, Government Press, 1996.Google Scholar

37 Timm, R. W. (ed.), Bangladesh: Parliamentary Election ‘96. Observation Report, Dhaka, Coordinating Council for Human Rights in Bangladesh, 1996, pp. 24–5.Google Scholar

38 Bangladesh Observer, 3 and 27 April 1996.

39 Ibid., 6 May 1996.

40 Fair Election Monitoring Alliance, Bangladesh Parliamentary Elections, 12 June, 1996, Dhaka, FEMA, 1996.Google Scholar

41 See ibid., pp. 27–8, for the manifestos of the major parties.

42 Commonwealth Observer Group, op. cit., p. 16.

43 Timm, op. cit., p. 21; Commonwealth Observer Group, op. cit.

44 Bangladesh Observer, 13, 14, 16, 21 and 23 June 1996; Ajker Kagoj, 13 June 1996; Fair Election Monitoring Alliance, op. cit., p. 36.

45 Asia Week, 28 June 1996, p. 30.

46 Rashiduzzaman, op. cit., p. 265.

47 An event during the term of the 1996 NCA had profound political and administrative ramifications and demonstrates the snares of dyarchy. The president unilaterally took action against the chief of the army and some of his associates who were accused of plotting a coup to seize power. On the day the coup plan came to his knowledge he went on television without informing the caretaker prime minister. He had the perpetrators arrested and later dismissed them from service without the NCA’s concurrence. The prime minister took exception to the president’s behaviour and himself addressed the nation explaining his position. Kochanek, op. cit., p. 138; Asia Week, 7 June 1996.

48 See, Hakim, Bangladesh Politics, op. cit., App. V.

49 The Annual Register, Vol. 233, London, Longman, 1991, p. 316.

50 Far Eastern Economic Review, 17 January 1991.

51 Karim, R., ‘The Election Debacle of the BNP’, Daily Star, 21 06 1996.Google Scholar

52 Fair Election Monitoring Alliance, op. cit., pp. 20–1.

53 Islam, Mujahidul, ‘The Neutrality and Other Aspects of the Caretaker Government’ (in Bengali), Farouque, in Golam (ed.), Election ‘96: NGO, the Bureaucracy, Black Money and Corruption, Dhaka, Minima Prokashan, 1996, p. 96;Google Scholar A. K. M. Badruddoja, ‘Electoral Rigging: ‘96 Style’, ibid., pp. 93–6.

54 Farouque, ibid., pp. 26–34, 60–2.

55 Keesing, , Record of World Events, 37:1 (1991)Google Scholar, Bethesda, MD, Keesing’s Worldwide, LLC 1991, p. 37965.

56 Harrop, M. and Miller, W. L., Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction, London, Macmillan, 1987, pp. 6–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar