Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:21:26.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nolan Committee: Financial Interests and Constituency Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Pippa Norris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Nolan Committee Has Put Parliament on Trial. Many believe that standards of public life have fallen into disrepute in recent years. The press has seized upon a series of sleaze issues: cash for parliamentary questions, the Scott inquiry into government contracts, undisclosed gifts from lobbyists, the hidden patronage of quango appointments, and the revolving door between public office and newly privatized company boards. Most believe this succession of stories has eroded public trust and confidence. Ivor Crewe's submission to the committee pointed out that agreement with the statement ‘Most MPs make a lot of money by using public office improperly’ has risen from 46 to 64 per cent in the last nine years. Lord Nolan, reflecting on evidence before his committee, noted: ‘One of the things we have been struck by is the depth of public cynicism about standards of conduct in public life, coupled with damaging cynicism about the motives of those who go into it.’ Some of the disquiet is produced by the succession of sexual imbroglios causing a series of ministerial resignations. Yet this has been of lesser concern to the Nolan Committee than standards of financial propriety at Westminster. The recommendations which emerged so far have focused on the need to avoid potential conflicts of interest, and the need for the transparent disclosure of financial dealings.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 441 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See article by Berrington, Hugh, ‘Political Ethics: The Nolan Report’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1995, pp. 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Wintour, Patrick, ‘The Clannish Inquisition’, The Guardian, 8 02 1995, p. 10.Google Scholar

3 Dyer, Clare, ‘Nolan Struck by Deep Cynicism over Standards in Public Life’, The Guardian, 11 03 1995, p. 3.Google Scholar

4 The British Candidate Study was directed by Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni, and full details are available in Political Recruitment; Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

5 This information was derived from Parliamentary Monitoring Service, Biographical Guide to the House of Commons, April 1992, PMS Publications, London, 1992.

6 See Norris and Lovenduski, op. cit.

7 The Review Body on Top Salaries, HMSO, May 1983.