Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:30:34.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

News Sources and Decision-Making in the EU Council: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Tim Veen  and
Jonathan Sullivan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , 2009 , pp. 471 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sullivan, Jonathan and Veen, Tim, ‘The EU Council: Shedding Light on an Opaque Institution,’ Government and Opposition, 44: 1 (2009) pp. 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Selck, Torsten J., Șebnem Yardımcı and Kathan, Constanze, ‘Still an Opaque Institution? Explaining Decision-Making in the EU Council using Newspaper Information: A Reply to Sullivan and Veen’, Government and Opposition, 44: 4 (2009), pp. 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Ibid., pp. 464–5.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 470.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 468.Google Scholar

6 Achen, Christopher H., ‘Institutional Realism and Bargaining Models’, in Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, Christopher H. and König, Thomas (eds), The European Union Decides, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 86–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Ibid.Google Scholar

8 Azar, Edward E., ‘Conflict Escalation and Conflict Reduction in an International Crisis: Suez, 1956’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16: 2 (1972), pp. 183–201;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Selck et al., ‘Still an Opaque Institution?’, p. 468.Google Scholar

10 Robert Thomson, ‘Appendix II: Comparison of Expert Judgements with Each Other and with Information from Council Documentation’, in Thomson et al., The European Union Decides, pp. 329–47.Google Scholar

11 Woolley, John T., ‘Using Media-Based Data in Studies of Politics’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 1 (2000), pp. 156–73, p. 158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarFor an empirical example see Daniel J. Myers and Beth Schaefer Caniglia, ‘All the Rioting That's Fit to Print: Selection Effects in National Newspaper Coverage of Civil Disorders, 1968–1969’, American Sociological Review, 69: 4 (2004), pp. 519–43.

12 Trenz, Hans-Jörg, ‘Media Coverage of European Governance: Exploring the European Public Sphere in National Quality Newspapers’, European Journal of Communication, 19: 3 (2004), pp. 291–319;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Christina Holtz-Bacha, Medienpolitik für Europa, Wiesbaden, VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006.

13 Selck et al., ‘Still an Opaque Institution?’, p. 467.Google Scholar

14 Ortiz, David G., Myers, Daniel J., Walls, Eugene N. and Diaz, Maria-Elena D., ‘Where Do We Stand with Newspaper Data?’, Mobilization: An International Journal, 19: 3 (2005), pp. 397–419.Google Scholar

15 Selck et al., ‘Still an Opaque Institution?’, p. 467. We take this to mean computer-assisted content analysis.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 469. In reality, however, the information is insufficient in scope and detail to be of much use in model-testing.Google Scholar

17 Laver, Michael, Benoit, Ken and Garry, John, ‘Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts using Words as Data’, American Political Science Review, 97: 2 (2003), pp. 311–31;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 van Atteveldt et al., ‘Good News or Bad News?’.Google Scholar