Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:59:28.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Domination in some Latter-Day Marxists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Kenneth Minogue
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , 01 July 1992 , pp. 397 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lukes, Steven, Marxism and Morality, Oxford University Press, 1985;Google Scholar ‘Can a Marxist Believe in Human Rights?’ in Moral Conflict and Politics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 173–88. Cf. ‘The Principles of 1989’ in the same volume, pp. 307–14.

2 The Theses on Feuerbach would seem to throw a great deal of light on the central inspiration of Bourdieu's thought, and the sixth in particular, which denies any reality to the individual and dissolves human experience into social relations would seem to be where Bourdieu begins, and also where he ends.

3 Spender, Dale, Man Made Language, Second Edition, London. Harper Collins, 1990 Google Scholar. The first edition was published in 1980.

4 Spender, op. cit. p. 25.

5 Spender, op. cit., ch. 5.

6 See, amid a large literature, Searle, John, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 See, for example, Leech, Geoffery, Semantics: the Study of Meaning, Harmondsworth, Penguin, Second Edition, 1981, especially ch. 16.Google Scholar