Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:09:44.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of the German Federal Constitutional Court on Politics and Policy Output

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Christine Landfried
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE OF THE SURRENDER OF LEGAL positivism to the prevalence of injustice under the nazi regime and the concern to create a real federation led the founding fathers of the Federal Republic of Germany to create the most powerful Constitutional Court in the world for the control of the formal and material constitutionality of laws.

This Court, a supreme constitutional organ like the Bundestag and the Bundesrat, is organized in two chambers, called Senates. The First Senate has jurisdiction over basic rights, the Second Senate decides all questions of political disputes. Though the Court only acts on request, it does nevertheless play an active role in shaping politics and policy output. The jurisdiction of this Court is the ‘authentic interpretation of the Constitution’ and it cannot be qualified as normal jurisdiction, because many provisions of the Basic Law are open to different interpretations and call for a reference to sources and premises beyond the document itself.

Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1985 , pp. 522 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Böckenförde, Ernst‐Wolfgang, ‘Die Methoden der Verfassungsinterprettion ‐Bestandsaufnahme und Kritik’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 29, 1976, p. 2099.Google Scholar

2 Kommers, Donald, Judicial Politics in West Germany. A study of the Federal Constitutional Court, Beverly Hills/London, Sage Publications, 1976, p. 155.Google Scholar

3 cf. tables in Landfried, Christine, Bundesuerfassungsgercht und Gesetzgeber, Baden‐Baden, Nomos, 1984, pp. 32–9.Google Scholar

4 Krislov, Samuel, The Supreme Court in the Political Process, New York/London, Macmillan, 1965, p. 29.Google Scholar

5 A Jürgen Jekewitz, ‘Bundesverfassungsgericht und Gesetzgeber. Zu den Vorwirkungen von Existenz und Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in den Bereich der Gesetzgebung’, Der Staat, 19, 1980, pp. 534–56.

6 Feeley, Malcolm, ‘Power, Impact and the Supreme Cour’, The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions. Empirical Studies, ed. Theodore Becker, Malcolm Feeley, New York, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 1978, p. 226.Google Scholar

7 cf. data in Christine Landfried, op. cit., p. 68.

8 ‘Üersicht über die vom Bundesverfassungsgericht für nichtig und die mit dem Grundgesetz fur unvercinbar erklärten Gesetze’, Bonn, Materialien des Deutschen Bundestages, No. 73, 1982.

9 Cappelletti, Mauro, ‘The Modern Systems of Judicial Review’, Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Mauro Cappelletti, William Cohen, New York/Charlottesville, Bobbs‐Merrill, 1979, p. 94.Google Scholar

10 COX, Archibald, The Warren Court. Constitutional Decision as an Instrument of Reform, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 5th ed., 1974.Google Scholar

11 Dopatka, Friedrich‐Wilhelm, ‘Zur Bedeutung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts in der politischen und gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung der Bundesrepublik 1951 bis 1978’, Vererfasrungsgericht und Politik, ed. Wolfgang Däubler, Gudrun Küsel, Reinbek: Rowohlt 1979, p. 45 Google Scholar; Cf. Wesel, Uwe, ‘Nach Karlsruhe gehen’, Kursbuch October 1984, pp. 123–44Google Scholar, who also divides the history of the Constitutional Court into clear ‘pro’ and ‘anti‐government’ periods and thereby neglects many decisions for which the cui‐bono question cannot be answered dcfinitely.

12 Fried, Erich, 100 Gedichte ohne Vaterland, Berlin, Wagenbach, 1978, p. 73.Google Scholar

13 For criticism cf. Meyer, Hans, ‘Anmerkung Zuni Urteil des BVerfG zur Au5f‐lösung des Bundestages’, DÖV 1983, S. 246 Google Scholar.

14 Benda, Ernst, ‘Bundesverfassungsgericht und Gesetzgeber im dritten Jahrzehnt des Crundgesetzes’, Die öffentliche Verwaltung, 32, 1979, p. 466.Google Scholar

15 Tocqueville, Alexis de, De la Démocratie en Amérique, Paris, Garnier‐Flammarion, 1981, p. 167 Google Scholar (reprint of the ed. of 1835).

16 Simon, Helmut, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit’, Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts, ed. Benda, Ernst, Werner Maihofer, Hans‐Jochen Vogel, Berlin/New York, de Gruyter, 1983, p. 1238.Google Scholar

17 Ely, John H., Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 4th ed., 1982, p. 74.Google Scholar

18 Neumann, Franz, Die Herrschaft des Gesetzes. Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von politischer Theorie und Rechtssystem in der Konkurrenzgesellschaft, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1980, p. 266 Google Scholar (reprint of Neumann’s dissertation of 1936).

19 For a detailed discussion of the deficit of information on the Constitutional Court see Beyme, Klaus von, ‘Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und Policy Analysis’, Festschrift für Rudolf Wassermann, ed. by Broda, et al., Darmstadtl Neuwied, Luchter‐hand, 1985, pp. 267‐77.Google Scholar

20 Rosen, Paul, The Supreme Court and Social Science, Urbana/Chicago, London, University of Illinois Press, 1972.Google Scholar

21 Miller, Arthur, Toward Increased Judicial Activism. The Political Role of the Supreme Court, WestportlLondon, Greenwood Press, 1982, p. 286.Google Scholar

22 Douglas, William, The Court Years 1939–1975, New York, Random House, 1980, p. 281.Google Scholar

23 For a restrictive understanding of the binding efficacy see Werner Holtfort, ‘Praktische Vorschläge, das Bundesverfassungsgericht in eine demokratieangemessene Rolle zurückzuführen’, Verfassungsgerickt und Politik, op. cit., p. 202.

24 Helmut Simon, op. cit., p. 1266.

25 Dolzer, Rudolf, Verfassungskonkretisierung durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht und durch politische Verfassungsorgane, Heidelberg, Deckar & Müller, 1982.Google Scholar