Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:17:48.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Groping for the Shape of Contemporary History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Arthur Knight
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , 01 October 1984 , pp. 510 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I See also my review in this journal, Vol. 19 no. 1, Winter 1984, pp. 114–9.

2 Shonfield, A., Modern Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

3 Hague, D., ‘Why change is meaning decay’, The Times, 5 06 1984.Google Scholar

4 Schumpeter, J., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1943,Google Scholar ch. 7.

5 W. Lazonick, ‘The Dynamics of Industrial Development’, paper presented at ESRC conference, November 1983.

6 Hannah, L., ‘New Issues in British Business History’, The Business History Review, Summer 1983.Google Scholar

7 Lindbeck, A., ‘The Recent Slowdown of Productivity Growth’, Economic Journal, 03 1983.Google Scholar

8 Henderson, P. D., ‘Trade Policies: trends, issues and influences’, Midland Book Review, Winter 1983.Google Scholar

9 Olson, M., The Rise und Decline of Nations, New York, Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

10 Henderson, P. D., op. cit. Benard, A., ‘A Europe Open to the world’, Trade Policy Research Centre, 1984.Google Scholar

11 Dore, R., ‘Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism’, based on the Hobhouse Memorial Lecture given at the London School of Economics, 05 1983, London, Technical Change Centre.Google Scholar

12 Tiffany, P., ‘Industrial Policy in American Steel, 1945‐60: A Study in Failure’, paper presented before the Social Science History Association, Washington, 1983.Google Scholar

13 Crandall, R., The US Steel Industry, Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1981.Google Scholar

14 Rohatyn, F., article in New York Review of Books, 29 03 1984.Google Scholar

15 Crozier, B., ‘What is wrong with British foreign policy? A time for reconsideration’, Encounter, 07/08 1984.Google Scholar

16 Dayton, K., Remarks to Financial Executives Institute, USA, 05 1983.Google Scholar

17 op. cit.

18 op. Cit.

19 Carter, C. and Pinder, J., Policies for a Constrained Economy, London, Heinemann Educational Books, 1982.Google Scholar

20 Allen, G. C., ‘Industrial Policy and Innovation in Japan’, Carter, C. (ed.), Industrial Policy and Innovation, London, Heinemann, 1981, p. 68.Google Scholar

21 op. Cit.

22 Thistlethwaite, F., The Great Experiment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1955, pp. 48–50.Google Scholar

23 Best, M. and Humphries, J., ‘The City and the Decline of British Industry: Liquidity without commitment’, paper presented at a Boston University conference 1983.Google Scholar

24 Thomas, D., ‘Shipbuilding: demand linkage and industrial decline’ in Williams, K. et al., Why Are the British Bad at Manufacturing?, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar