Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:22:39.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Sticks to Carrots: Electoral Manipulation in Africa, 1986–2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Carolien van Ham  and
Staffan I. Lindberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over 90 per cent of the world’s states currently select their national leaders through multiparty elections. However, in Africa the quality of elections still varies widely, ranging from elections plagued by violence and fraud to elections that are relatively ‘free and fair’. Yet, little is known about trade-offs between different strategies of electoral manipulation and the differences between incumbent and opposition actors’ strategies. We theorize that choices for specific types of manipulation are driven by available resources and cost considerations for both incumbents and opposition actors, and are mutually responsive. We also suggest that costs of manipulative strategies are shaped by the level of democratization. We test our hypotheses on a time series, cross-sectional data set with observations for 286 African elections from 1986 to 2012. We find that democratization makes ‘cheap’ forms of electoral manipulation available to incumbents such as intimidation and manipulating electoral administration less viable, thus leading to increases in vote buying. The future of democracy in Africa thus promises elections where the administration of elections becomes better and better but at the same time vote buying will increase. Not all things go together, at least not all the time. The future of democracy in Africa will mean more money in politics, more patronage and more clientelistic offers thrown around, at least in the short to medium term.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 50 , Supplement 3: 50th Anniversary Special Issue THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY , July 2015 , pp. 521 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Carolien van Ham is a Research Fellow at the V-Dem Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, and a Lecturer in Politics at the University of New South Wales. Contact email: [email protected].

Staffan I. Lindberg is a Professor at the V-Dem Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Ayittey, G. (1992), Africa Betrayed (New York: St Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
Birch, S. (2011), Electoral Malpractice (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bratton, M. (2008), ‘Vote Buying and Violence in Nigerian Election Campaigns’, Electoral Studies, 27: 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M. and van de Walle, N. (1997), Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in a Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, V., Nazareno, M. and Stokes, S.C. (2004), ‘Vote Buying in Argentina’, Latin American Research Review, 39(2): 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnell, P. (2001), ‘The Party System and Party Politics in Zambia: Continuities Past, Present and Future’, African Affairs, 100(399): 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, T. (1997), ‘Democracy without Illusions’, Foreign Affairs, 76: 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter Center (2011), ‘International Election Observation Mission to Côte d’Ivoire: Final Report, 2010 Presidential Elections and 2011 Legislative Elections’, Carter Center, www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/cote-diviore-2010-2011-elections-final-rpt.pdf.Google Scholar
Collier, D. and Levitsky, S. (1997), ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49(3): 430–451.Google Scholar
Collier, P. and Vicente, P.C. (2013), ‘Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria’, Economic Journal, 124: 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S.I., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Fish, M.S., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C.H., Kroenig, M., McMann, K., Pemstein, D., Reif, M., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., Tzelgov, E. and Wang, Y.-T. (2014), ‘Varieties of Democracy: Codebook v3’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, https://v-dem.net/DemoComp/en/reference/version-3-december-2014.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1989), Democracy and its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2002), ‘Elections without Democracy: Thinking about Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 21–35.Google Scholar
Donno, D. (2013), Defending Democratic Norms: International Actors and the Politics of Electoral Misconduct (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorenspleet, R. (2000), ‘Reassessing the Three Waves of Democratization’, World Politics, 52(3): 384–406.Google Scholar
Elklit, J. and Reynolds, A. (2005), ‘A Framework for the Systematic Study of Election Quality’, Democratization, 12(2): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elklit, J. and Svensson, P. (1997), ‘What Makes Elections Free and Fair?’, Journal of Democracy, 8(3): 32–46.Google Scholar
Evrensel, A. (2010) (ed.), Voter Registration in Africa: A Comparative Analysis (Johannesburg: EISA).Google Scholar
Global Commission on Elections, Democracy and Security (2012), Deepening Democracy: A Strategy for Improving the Integrity of Elections Worldwide. Report of the Global Commission on Elections, Democracy and Security, http://kofiannanfoundation.org/sites/default/files/deepening_democracy_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Hadenius, A. and Teorell, J. (2005), Assessing Alternative Indices of Democracy, Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper (Mexico City: CIDE).Google Scholar
Hermet, G., Rose, R. and Rouquie, A. (1978) (eds), Elections without Choice (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
van Ham, C. (2012), ‘Beyond Electoralism? Electoral Fraud in Third Wave Regimes 1974–2009’, PhD dissertation, European University Institute.Google Scholar
van Ham, C. (2014), ‘Getting Elections Right? Measuring Electoral Integrity’, Democratization, published early online, March, doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.877447.Google Scholar
Hicken, A.D. (2007), ‘How Do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying?’, in F.C. Schaffer (ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 47–60.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Hyde, S.D. (2011), ‘Catch us if you Can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion’, American Journal of Political Science, 55(2): 356–369.Google Scholar
Hyden, G. and Bratton, M. (1992) (eds), Governance and Politics in Africa (Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
Joseph, R. (1998), ‘Africa, 1990–1997: From Abertura to Closure’, Journal of Democracy, 9(2): 3–17.Google Scholar
Karl, T.L. (1995), ‘The Hybrid Regimes of Central America’, Journal of Democracy, 6(3): 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, T.L. (2000), ‘Electoralism’, in R. Rose (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Elections (London: Macmillan): 95–96.Google Scholar
Keefer, P. and Vlaicu, R. (1997), Democracy, Credibility and Clientelism, Policy Research Working Paper 3472 (Washington, DC: World Bank).Google Scholar
Kramon, E. (2013), ‘Vote Buying and Accountability in Democratic Africa’, PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, F. (2003), ‘Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences’, Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 233–256.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, F. (2007), ‘When Does a Market for Votes Emerge?’, in F.C. Schaffer (ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner): 33–45.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A. and Weibull, J.W. (1987), ‘Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition’, Public Choice, 52: 273–297.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. (2006), Democracy and Elections in Africa (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. (2009) (ed.), Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Lindberg, S., Coppedge, M., Gerring, J. and Teorell, J. (2014), ‘V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 25(3): 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2014), Why Electoral Integrity Matters (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Norris, P., Frank, R.W. and Martinez i Coma, F. (2015) (eds), Contentious Elections: From Ballots to Barricades (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Nugent, P. (2001), ‘Winners, Losers, and Also Rans: Money, Moral Authority, and Voting Patterns in the Ghana 2000 Election’, African Affairs, 100(400): 405–428.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G.A. (1998), ‘Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies’, Journal of Democracy, 9(3): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, G.A. (2004), ‘Why the Rule of Law Matters’, Journal of Democracy, 15(4): 32–46.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000), Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Posner, D. (2005), Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2000), Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Limongi, F. (1997), ‘Modernization: Theories and Facts’, World Politics, 49(2): 155–183.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J.A. and Limongi, F. (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S.C. and Manin, B. (1999) (eds), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Reif, M. (2009), ‘Making Democracy Safe: Explaining the Causes, Rise, and Decline of Coercive Campaigning and Election Violence in Old and New Democracies’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, 3–6 September.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Shin, C.D. (2001), ‘Democratization Backwards: The Problem of Third-wave Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 31(2): 331–354.Google Scholar
Ross, M.L. (2013), ‘Oil and Gas Data, 1932–2011’, http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20369UNF:5:dc22RlDasveOTAJvwIjBTA==V2 [Version].Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers).Google Scholar
Schaffer, F.C. (2007) (ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (London: Lynne Rienner).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, A. (2002), ‘The Menu of Manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 36–50.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. (2009), ‘Electoral Authoritarianism’, in T. Landman and N. Robinson (eds), The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics (London: Sage): 381.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. and Karl, T.L. (1991), ‘What Democracy is . . . and is Not’, Journal of Democracy, 2(3): 75–88.Google Scholar
Simpser, A. (2013), Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Stokes, S.C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M. and Brusco, V. (2013), Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, J., Charron, N., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Sundin, P. and Svensson, R. (2013), The Quality of Government Dataset, version 15 May 13 (University of Gothenburg, Quality of Government Institute), www.qog.pol.gu.se.Google Scholar
Vicente, P. and Wantchekon, L. (2009), ‘Clientelism and Vote Buying: Lessons from Field Experiments in African Elections’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(2): 292–305.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2015), ‘Where’s the Party? The Decline of Party Institutionalization and What (if Anything) that Means for Democracy’, Government and Opposition, 50(3), doi:10.1017/gov.2015.5 (in this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, F. (1997), ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 76: 22–41.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

van Ham and Lindberg supplementary material S1

Online Appendix

Download van Ham and Lindberg supplementary material S1(File)
File 18.5 KB