Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
‘WITHOUT TRUST WE WILL NOT SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS,’ WARNED Johannes Rau, the former German Federal president in his last ‘Berlin speech’ in May 2004. As one reason for an alarming loss of trust in Germany, creating a serious obstacle to necessary changes, he identified an irresponsible, egoistic and greedy behaviour among parts of German elites. Actually, Johannes Rau did not blame only political elites but also elite members in other sectors such as business, trade unions or mass media. His statement implies that parts of German elites are causing a decline in trust in Germany by losing touch with the people. Likewise, various observers in the public discourse argue that the immoral, cynical and increasingly incompetent behaviour of several elite members especially fosters a crisis of trust in Germany by creating a diffuse climate of distrust, pessimism, uncertainty and Zukunftsangst.
1 See, for example, Wiesendahl, Elmar, ‘Parteien und die Politik der Zumutungen’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 40 (2004), pp. 19–24 Google Scholar; Peter Pulte, ‘Über Pleiten zur Abfindung. Welche Risiken tragen Vorstände und Unternehmer?’, in Oscar W. Gabriel, Beate Neuss and Günther Rüther (eds), Konjunktur der Köpfe?, Düsseldorf, Droste, 2004, pp. 282–94; Gregor Vogelsang and Christian Burger, Werte schaffen Wert, Munich, Econ, 2004.
2 Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.), Politische Partizipation in Deutschland, Gütersloh, Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2004, p. 62.Google Scholar
3 Data and documentation are obtainable through the Central Archive for Empirical Social Research, University of Cologne. I would like to thank Wolfgang Gibowski and the Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, Mannheim for providing the data of 2005, which were not yet available at the ZA, Cologne when I finished the manuscript.Google Scholar
4 Pippa Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999; Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam (eds), Disaffected Democracies, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2000; Russell J. Dalton, Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004; Dalton, Russell J., ‘The Social Transformation of Trust in Government’, International Review of Sociology, 15 (2005), pp. 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kenneth Newton, ‘Political Support: Social Capital, Civil Society and Political and Economic Performance’, Political Studies, 54 (2006), pp. 846–64. See further Gabriela Catterberg and Alejandro Moreno, ‘The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18 (2005), pp. 31–48.
5 Pippa Norris, ‘The Growth of Critical Citizens?’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 1–27, pp. 21–5.Google Scholar
6 Robert D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993; Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
7 Kaase, Max, ‘Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe’, West European Politics, 22 (1999), pp. 1–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kenneth Newton, ‘Social and Political Trust in Established Democracies’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 169–187; Kenneth Newton and Pippa Norris, ‘Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture, or Performance?’, in Pharr and Putnam, Disaffected Democracies, pp. 52–73; Oscar W. Gabriel, Volker Kunz, Sigrid Roßteutscher and Jan van Deth, Sozialkapital und Demokratie, Vienna, WUV-Univ.-Verlag, 2002; Dalton, Democratic Challenges, pp. 69–71.
8 For recent publications see Dalton, Democratic Challenges, pp. 111–27; Newton, ‘Political Support’.Google Scholar
9 Among others, see Ola Listhaug, ‘The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians’, in Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds), Citizens and the State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 261–97; Chanley, Virginia A., Rudolph, Thomas J. and Rahn, Wendy M., ‘The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (2000), pp. 239–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
10 Dalton, Democratic Challenges, pp. 126–7.Google Scholar
11 Anderson, Christopher and Guillory, Christine A., ‘Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems’, American Political Science Review, 91 (1997), pp. 66–81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pippa Norris, ‘Institutional Explanations for Political Support’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 217–35.
12 For the impact of value change see e.g. Ronald Inglehart, ‘Postmodernization Erodes Respect for Authority, but Increases Support for Democracy’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 236–56; Russell J. Dalton, ‘Political Support in Advanced Industrial Countries’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 57–77; Russell J. Dalton, ‘Value Change and Democracy’, in Pharr and Putnam, Disaffected Democracies, pp. 252–69; Dalton, Democratic Challenges, pp. 97–110; Catterberg and Moreno, ‘The Individual Bases of Political Trust’. For the influence of cognitive mobilization see e.g. Listhaug, ‘The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians’; Inglehart, ‘Postmodernization Erodes Respect for Authority’; Dalton, ‘The Social Transformation of Trust in Government’.Google Scholar
13 Listhaug, ‘The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians’.Google Scholar
14 See Pippa Norris, ‘The Impact of Television on Civic Malaise’, in Norris, Critical Citizens, pp. 231–51; Dalton, Democratic Challenges, pp. 71–3; Hans Mathias Kepplinger, ‘Skandale und Politikverdrossenheit – ein Langzeitvergleich’, in Otfried Jarren, Heribert Schatz and Hartmut Weßler (eds), Medien und politischer Prozess, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1996, pp. 41–51; Listhaug, ‘The Dynamics of Trust in Politicians’; Hans Mathias Kepplinger, Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft, Freiburg and Munich, Alber, 1998.Google Scholar
15 Miller, Arthur A. and Listhaug, Ola, ‘Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States’, British Journal of Political Science, 20 (1990), pp. 357–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar– emphasis added. See also William A. Gamson, Power and Discontent, Homewood, IL, Dorsey, 1968, p. 40; Oscar W. Gabriel, ‘Political Efficacy and Trust’, in Jan van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds), The Impact of Values, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 357–89, p. 361; Stacy G. Ulbig, ‘Policies, Procedures, and People: Sources of Support for Government?’, Social Science Quarterly, 83 (2002), pp. 789–809, p. 792; Marc J. Hetherington, Why Trust Matters, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005, p. 9.
16 Although most Germans support the idea of democracy, it is less entrenched among East Germans and has been losing support in Eastern Germany since 1990. See Kerstin Völkl, ‘Fest verankert oder ohne Halt? Die Unterstützung der Demokratie im vereinigten Deutschland’, in Oscar W. Gabriel, Jürgen W. Falter and Hans Rattinger (eds), Wächst zusammen was zusammengehört?, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2005, pp. 249–84; Kerstin Völkl, ‘Überwiegt die Verdrossenheit oder die Unterstützung? Die Einstellungen der West- und Ostdeutschen zur Demokratie, zu politischen Institutionen und Politikern’, in Jürgen W. Falter, Oscar W. Gabriel, Hans Rattinger and Harald Schoen (eds), Sind wir ein Volk?, Munich, Beck, 2006, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
17 Völkl, ‘Überwiegt die Verdrossenheit oder die Unterstützung?’; see further Oskar Niedermayer, Bürger und Politik, 2nd edn, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 2005, p. 97f.Google Scholar
18 Oskar Niedermayer, ‘PolitikerInnenverdrossenheit? Zur Entwicklung der Bevölkerungsorientierungen gegenüber dem politischen Führungspersonal’, in Werner Rossade, Birgit Sauer and Dietmar Schirmer (eds), Politik und Bedeutung, Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2002, pp. 109–24; Melanie Walter-Rogg, ‘Eliten oder Nieten – Wie denken die Bürger über die (politischen) Führungsgruppen?’, in Gabriel, Neuss and Rüther, Konjunktur der Köpfe, pp. 101–23; Melanie Walter-Rogg, ‘Politisches Vertrauen ist gut – Misstrauen ist besser? Ausmaß und Ausstrahlungseffekte des Politiker- und Institutionenvertrauens im vereinigten Deutschland’, in Gabriel, Falter and Rattinger, Wächst zusammen was zusammengehört?, pp. 129–86.Google Scholar
19 Oscar W. Gabriel, ‘Integration durch Institutionenvertrauen? Struktur und Entwicklung des Verhältnisses der Bevölkerung zum Parteienstaat und zum Rechtsstaat im vereinigten Deutschland’, in Jürgen Friedrichs and Wolfgang Jagodzinski (eds), Soziale Integration, Opladen and Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999, pp. 199–235.Google Scholar
20 See the summary by Kai Arzheimer, Politikverdrossenheit, Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2002; see further Kaina, Viktoria, ‘Vertrauen in Eliten und die politische Unterstützung der Demokratie’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 45 (2004), pp. 519–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Russell Hardin, Trust, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006, pp. 35–71.
21 Parry, Geraint, ‘Trust, Distrust and Consensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 6 (1976), pp. 129–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Gabriel, ‘Integration durch Institutionenvertrauen?’, p. 205.Google Scholar
23 Parry, ‘Trust, Distrust and Consensus’.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., p. 138f.Google Scholar
25 M. Rainer Lepsius, ‘Vertrauen zu Institutionen’, in Stefan Hradil (ed.), Differenz und Integration, Frankfurt am Main and New York, Campus, 1997, pp. 283–93.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., p. 285; Arthur Benz, ‘Vertrauensbildung im Mehrebenensystem’, in Rainer Schmalz-Bruns and Reinhard Zintl (eds), Politisches Vertrauen, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2002, pp. 275–91, p. 276.Google Scholar
27 David Easton, A Systems Analysis of Political Life, 2nd edn, New York, University of Chicago Press, 1979, p. 278.Google Scholar
28 Reinhard Zintl, ‘Rationalität und Moralität politischen Vertrauens’, in Schmalz-Bruns and Zintl, Politisches Vertrauen, pp. 171–90, p. 176.Google Scholar
29 This idea does not aim at trust in particular persons since face-to-face situations are becoming rarer in modern societies. Rather, trust is directed at actors of rule-driven institutions. See for this note Gerhard Göhler, ‘Stufen des politischen Vertrauens’, in Schmalz-Bruns and Zintl, Politisches Vertrauen, pp. 221–38, p. 229.Google Scholar
30 Zintl, ‘Rationalität und Moralität politischen Vertrauens’.Google Scholar
31 Viktoria Kaina, Elitenvertrauen und Demokratie. Zur Akzeptanz gesellschaftlicher Führungskräfte im vereinten Deutschland, Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2002, p. 35.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., p. 30.Google Scholar
33 Karp, Jeffrey A., ‘Explaining Public Support for Legislative Term Limits’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 59 (1995), pp. 373–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 Kaina, Viktoria, ‘Direkte Demokratie als Ausweg? – Repräsentativverfassung und Reformforderungen im Meinungsbild von Politikeliten und Bevölkerung’, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 12 (2002), pp. 1045–72Google Scholar.
35 I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for drawing my attention to the BBC lecture by Onora O’Neill in 2002. See Onora O’Neill, Called to Account: The 2002 Reith Lectures, London, BBC Publications, 2002, available online at www.bbc.co.uk/print/radio4/reith2002/lecture3.shtml?print.Google Scholar
36 Viktoria Kaina, ‘Was sind Eliten?’, in Gabriel, Neuss and Rüther, Konjunktur der Köpfe?, pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
37 E.g. Suzanne Keller, Beyond the Ruling Class, New York, Random House, 1963; John Higley and Richard Gunther (eds), Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992; Higley, John and Burton, Michael, ‘Elite Settlements and Taming of Politics’, Government and Opposition, 33 (1998), pp. 99–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; John Higley, Jan Pakulski and Włodzimierz Wesołowski (eds), Postcommunist Elites and Democracy in Eastern Europe, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 1998; John Higley and György Lengyel (eds), Elites After State Socialism, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000; John Higley and Michael Burton, Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
38 Martin K. W. Schweer, ‘Der vertrauenswürdige Politiker im Urteil der Wähler’, in Martin K. W. Schweer, Vertrauen und soziales Handeln, Berlin, Luchterhand, 1997, pp. 220–33.Google Scholar
39 I would like to thank the Institute of Allensbach for putting the results at my disposal.Google Scholar
40 E.g. Schweer, ‘Der vertrauenswürdige Politiker’; Piotr Sztompka, Trust, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999; Bertelsmann Stiftung, Politische Partizipation in Deutschland, pp. 64–7.Google Scholar
41 See Wilhelm Bürklin and Hilke Rebenstorf et al., Eliten in Deutschland, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 1997. The data are available at the Central Archive, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
42 For this finding and the following results based on the Potsdam Elite Study 1995; see Kaina, Elitenvertrauen und Demokratie.Google Scholar
43 See also Gary Orren, ‘Fall from Grace: The Public's Loss of Faith in Government’, in Joseph S. Nye, Jr, Philip Zelikow and David C. King (eds), Why People Don't Trust Government, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
44 For empirical evidence for this assumption see e.g. Seymour Martin Lipset and William Schneider, The Confidence Gap, revised edn, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987, p. 382; Derek Bok, ‘Measuring the Performance of Government’, in Nye, Zelikow and King, Why People Don't Trust Government, pp. 55–65; Kimball, David C. and Paterson, Samuel C., ‘Living up to Expectations: Public Attitudes toward Congress’, Journal of Politics, 59 (1997), pp. 701–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marc J. Hetherington, ‘The Political Relevance of Political Trust, American Political Science Review, 92 (1998), pp. 791–808; Newton and Norris, ‘Confidence in Public Institutions’; Kaina, Elitenvertrauen und Demokratie; Dalton, Democratic Challenges.