THIS STUDY IS ONE OF COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS deliberately avoiding a sociological definition of the situation. It is assumed that two societies had existed in Czechoslovakia for some time and the difference between them, and possible analogies, are examined. There is also an assumption that the division of Czechoslovakia occurred especially because ‘Czechoslovak society’ as such had not yet been established; this was in spite of the fact that the two societies, at the time of the split, had substantially more in common than they had had at the time of Czechoslovakia's formation. There exists the view, which we want to verify, that during the decline of the federation the following factors were significant:
1. The differences in economic, social, cultural and dispositional structures;
2. The asynchronous and differing processes of modernization in both societies;
3. The different consequences of the formation of societies of Soviet type in the Czech Lands in Slovakia;
4. The differing processes for rectification of political, economic and cultural institutions in both republics after November 1989.
1 See also van Amersfoort, H., ‘Nationalities, Cities, and Ethnic Conflicts: Towards a Theory of Ethnicity in the Modern State’ in van Amersfoort, H. and Knippenberg, H., Stales and Nations. The Rebirth of the ‘Nationalities Question’ in Europe, Amsterdam, Nederlandse Georgrafische Studies 137, 1991.Google Scholar
2 Clark, C., The Conditions of Economic Progress, New York, 1940;Google Scholar Fourastie, J., Le grand espoir du XXe siécle, Paris, 1949 Google Scholar and Friedrichs, J., Stadtentwicklungen in West‐ und Osteuropa, Berlin and New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 J. Friedrichs, ibid.
4 Mihailovič, K., Regional Development: Experience and Prospects in Eastern Europe, Mouton, The Hague, 1973.Google Scholar
5 Landry, A., La réVolution démographique, Paris, Librairie du Recueil Sirey, 1934.Google Scholar
6 Notestein, F. W., ‘Population Theory. Long View’, in Schulz, T. W. (ed.), Food for the World, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1945 Google Scholar. See also Thompson, W. S., Population Problems, London, McGraw Hill, 1930.Google Scholar
7 See Fialová, L., Pavlfk, Z. and Vereš, P., ‘Fertility Decline in Czechoslovakia during the Last Two Centuries’, Population Studies, 44, 1990, pp. 89–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Hajnal, J., ‘Household Formation Patterns in Historical Perspective’, Population and Development Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1982, pp. 449–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Švecová, S., ‘Dva typy tradičnej rolnickej rodiny v Československu’ (Two Types of Traditional Agricultural Families in Czechoslovakia), ČeskyAlid lid 76, pp. 110 – 22.Google Scholar
10 Compare R. Roško, K. Podoláková and J. Jančovicová, Sociálna Štruktura slovenskej a českej spoločnosti (The Social Structure of Slovak and Czech Society), P. Machonin et al., In Ceskoslovenská společnost, Bratislava, Epocha, 1969 with P. Machonin's 1992 essay: ‘Česko‐slovenske vztahy ve světle dat sociologickeho vyskumu’ (Czechoslovak Relations in the Light of Sociological Research Data), in Gal, F. et al. (eds), Dnešní krize česko‐slovmskyAch uztahu, Prague, Slon, 1992.Google Scholar
11 Štefánek, A., Základy sociografit Slovenska (Principles of Sociography of Slovakia), Bratislava, 1944.Google Scholar
12 See, for example, Holotfk, L., ‘Die Slowaken’, in Wandruska, A. and Urbanitsch, P. (eds), Die Habsburgenmonarchie 1848 – 1918, Vienna, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaffen, 1980.Google Scholar
13 Cf. Urban, O., Česká společnost 1848‐1918 (Czech Society 1848‐1918), Prague, Svoboda, 1982.Google Scholar
14 Štefanek, A., 'Slovensko. Přehled politickyA (Slovakia. Political Survey), Slovnik národohospodrsky, sociálni a politiclyA. III, Prague, O. Janáček, 1933.Google Scholar
15 We have relied on P. Machonin's research published in 1992, op. cit., on the transformation of Czechoslovak social structure carried out by the Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and by the Institute of Social and Political Sciences of the Faculty of Social Sciences of Charles University.
16 P. Machonin, ibid.
17 Rosko, R., ‘Zbližovanie robotnikov e inteligencie’ (Bringing Closer the Intelligentzia and the Working Class), Studie/Pramene, 6, Bratislava, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 1986.Google Scholar
18 Stacey, M., Tradition and Change. A Study of Banbury, ‐ Glasgow, Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
19 Cf. Skalnik Leff, C., National Conflict in Czechoslovakia, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1968, pp. 289‐91.Google Scholar
20 Kiihnl, K., Migration and Settlement: 16. Czechoslovakia RR‐82‐32, Laxemburg (Austria), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1982.Google Scholar
21 Hechter, M., Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, London, Routledge, 1975.Google Scholar
22 McKay, J., ‘An Exploratory Synthesis of Primordial and Mobilizationist Approaches to Ethnic Phenomena’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 5, pp. 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar