Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:10:58.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Class Compromise as Middle Power Activism? Comparing Brazil and South Africa1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2012

Janis van der Westhuizen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most glaring differences between traditional and emerging middle powers relates to their projection of societal values abroad. Since most emerging powers are essentially fragmented multiclass states, class compromise often emerges to intermediate contradictory demands emanating from fragile political coalitions. Against the backdrop of vast income inequalities, and facing some domestic constituencies favouring liberalization on the one hand against pro-redistributive groups on the other, adopting a middle power role, in the cases of South Africa and Brazil, emerges in order to ameliorate these conflicting demands. Two dimensions are examined very briefly, namely recent mediation efforts in Iran and Libya and attempts to effect redistribution by reforming processes of global governance.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 80 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Janis van der Westhuizen is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at Stellenbosch University. Contact email: [email protected].

1

I am indebted to two anonymous reviewers of an earlier draft for their very useful suggestions.

References

Amaral, A.D., Kingstone, P.R.Krieckhaus, J. (2008), ‘The Limits of Economic Reform in Brazil’, in P.R. Kingstone and T.J. Power (eds), Democratic Brazil Revisited (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press): 137–60.Google Scholar
Amorim, C. (2010), ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003–2010): An Overview’, Revisita Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 53: 214–240.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2003) (ed.), Non-contributory Pensions and Poverty Prevention: A Comparative Study of Brazil and South Africa, final report, DFID Project R7897, Institute for Development and Policy Management and HelpAge.Google Scholar
Bourne, R. (2008), Lula of Brazil: The Story so Far (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Burges, S. (2009), Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War (Gainesville: University of Florida Press).Google Scholar
Case Bryant, C. (2011), ‘Surging BRIC Middle Classes Are Eclipsing Global Poverty’, Christian Science Monitor, 17 May.Google Scholar
Cason, J.Power, T. (2009), ‘Presidentialization, Pluralization and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso-Lula Era’, International Political Science Review, 30(2): 117–140.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1989), ‘Middlepowermanship, Japan and Future World Order’, International Journal, 44: 823–862.Google Scholar
da Silva, L.I.L (2008), ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy’, www.brazemb-ksa.org/foreignpolicy.htm.Google Scholar
De Almeida, P. (2010), ‘Never Before Seen in Brazil: Luis Inácio Lula da Silva's Grand Diplomacy’, Revisita Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 53(2):160–177.Google Scholar
Dröge, S. (2010) (ed.), International Climate Policy: Priorities of Key Negotiating Parties, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Research Paper (Berlin).Google Scholar
The Economist (2011), ‘Time for a Change: Why a Euro-zone Finance Minister, Even a Talented One, Should Not Lead the IMF’, The Economist, 28 May.Google Scholar
Flemes, D. (2009a), ‘Brazilian Foreign Policy in the Changing World Order’, South African Journal of International Affairs, 16(2): 161–182.Google Scholar
Flemes, D. (2009b), ‘India–Brazil–South Africa (IBSA) in the New Global Order: Interests, Strategies and Values of the Emerging Coalition’, International Studies, 46(4): 401–421.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1978), ‘The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics’, International Organization, 32(4): 881–912.Google Scholar
Gumede, W. (2005), Thabo Mbeki and the Battle for the Soul of the ANC (Cape Town: Zebra Press).Google Scholar
Hochstetler, K. (2008), ‘Organized Civil Society in Lula's Brazil’, in P.R. Kingstone and T.J. Power (eds), Democratic Brazil Revisited (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press): 33–56.Google Scholar
Hunter, W., ‘The Partido dos Trabalhadores: Still a Party of the Left?’, in P.R. Kingstone and T.J. Power (eds), Democratic Brazil Revisited (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press): 15–32.Google Scholar
IDRC (International Development Research Centre) (2008) ‘Emerging Donors in International Development Assistance’, January, www.idrc.ca/EN/Documents/Case-of-South-Africa.pdf.Google Scholar
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2011), ‘IMF Quotas’, IMF fact sheet, March, www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/quotas.htm.Google Scholar
Jakobeit, C. (2010), ‘IBSA and the G-20: Scope for Change?’, paper prepared for the fourth Regional Powers Network Conference, Stellenbosch, 6–7 September.Google Scholar
Jordaan, E. (2003), ‘The Concept of a Middle Power in the International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers’, Politikon, 30(1): 165–181.Google Scholar
Kholi, A. (2004), State Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kornegay, F. (2011), ‘Libya: SA Foreign Policy Has Seen Better Days’, Mail and Guardian, 7 September.Google Scholar
Landsberg, C. (2010), The Diplomacy of Transformation: South African Foreign Policy and Statecraft (Johannesburg: Pan Macmillan).Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. (2001), ‘National Political Community and the Politics of Income Taxation in Brazil and South Africa in the Twentieth Century’, Politics and Society, 29(4): 515–555.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. (2003), Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lieberman, E. (2009), Boundaries of Contagion: How Ethnic Politics Have Shaped Government Responses to AIDS (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mail and Guardian (2010), ‘Malema: Mine Nationalisation is on ANC Agenda’, Mail and Guardian, 7 May, http://mg.co.za/article/2010-05-07-malema-mine-nationalisation-is-on-anc-agenda.Google Scholar
Manuel, T. (2009), ‘Report of the Committee of Eminent Persons on IMF Governance Reform’, Ministry of Finance, Republic of South Africa, M 3/1/1 (389/09), 24 March.Google Scholar
Marais, H. (2011), South Africa Pushed to the Limit: The Political Economy of Change (Claremont: UCT Press).Google Scholar
Mbeki, T. (2001), ‘Addressing the Backlash Against Globalisation: A Southern Perspective of the Problem’, remarks at the World Economic Forum, Davos, 28 January, www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/2001/mbek0128a.htm.Google Scholar
MercoPress (2010), ‘Lula da Silva's Party Fearful of “Brazilian Sub-imperialism” and Arrogance’, MercoPress, 8 February, http://en.mercopress.com/2010/02/08/lula-da-silva-s-party-fearful-of-brazilian-sub-imperialism-and-arrogance.Google Scholar
Mills, G. (2011), ‘SA's Stance on Libya Furthers Rogue Trend’, Mail and Guardian, 2 September.Google Scholar
Morais, L.Saad-Filho, A. (2011), ‘Brazil beyond Lula: Forging Ahead or Pausing for Breath?’, Latin American Perspectives, 38(31): 31–44.Google Scholar
Nel, P. (2010), ‘Redistribution and Recognition: What Emerging Regional Powers Want’, Review of International Studies, 36: 951–974.Google Scholar
Noël, A.Thérien, J.P. (1995), ‘From Domestic to International Justice: The Welfare State and Foreign Aid’, International Organization, 49(3): 523–535.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1998), ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’, International Organization, 42(3): 427–460.Google Scholar
Roett, R. (2010), The New Brazil (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Samson, M. (2009), ‘(Sub)imperial South Africa? Reframing the Debate’, Review of African Political Economy, 36: 93–103.Google Scholar
Sandbrook, R., Edelman, M., Heller, P.Teichman, J. (2007), Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Seidman, G. (1994), Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Seidman, G. (2010), ‘Brazil's “Pro-poor” Strategies: What South Africa Could Learn’, Transformation, 72(73): 86–103.Google Scholar
Sotero, P. (2010), ‘Brazil's Rising Ambition in a Shifting Global Balance of Power’, Politics, 30(1): 71–81.Google Scholar
Spektor, M. (2010), ‘Brazil: The Underlying Ideas of Regional Policies’, in D. Flemes (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers (Farnham: Ashgate): 191–206.Google Scholar
Vollgraaff, R. (2011), ‘Red Lights Flash on Debt’, Sunday Times, 18 September.Google Scholar