Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:10:55.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizens, Charters and Public Service Reform in France and Britain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

David Clark
David Clark*
Affiliation:
Principal Lecturer in Government at Southampton Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THE PATTERN OF SIMILARITIES AND differences in Britain and France with regard to public service charterism: that strand of recent public service reform designed to reconstruct relations between the state and the citizen on the basis of new or revitalized principles of public service, epitomized by the Citizen's Charter (1991) in Britain and the Charte des Services Publics (1992) in France. Despite the appearance of increasing convergence in the rhetoric of public management reform in the two countries during the 1990s, especially during the incumbency of centre-left governments in the latter part of the decade, there is evidence of continuing divergence in the philosophy and practice of public service charterism. This article argues that variation is a function of the existence of country-specific public service regimes, embodying different ideals of citizenship, which have shaped the emergence and implementation of charter policy in Britain and France.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 152 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hood, C., ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’, Public Administration, 69:1, 1991, pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 See, inter alia, Rhodes, R. A. W., The New Governance, Buckingham, Open University Press, 1997 Google Scholar; and Kooiman, J. (ed.), Modern Governance, London, Sage, 1993.Google Scholar

3 Yeatman, A., ‘The Reform of Public Administration’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53:3 (1997), pp. 287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 See, inter alia, Premfors, R., ‘Reshaping the Democratic State: Swedish Experiences in a Comparative Perspective’, Public Administration, 76:1 (1998), pp. 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 This phrase is borrowed from Yeatman, A., ‘The New Contactualism: Management Reform or a New Approach to Governance? in Weller, P. and Davis, G. (eds), New Ideas, Better Government, St Leonard’s, Allen & Unwin, 1996.Google Scholar

6 Chevallier, J., ‘L’administration face au public’, in Chevallier, J., Drai, R. and Rangeon, F., La Communication Administration-Administré, Amiens, Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar

7 Premier Ministre, Ministre d’Etat, Ministère de la Fonction Publique et des Réformes Administratives, Le Renouveau du Service Public, Paris, Service d’Information et de Diffusion du Premier Ministre, 1989.

8 The data protection and access to information reforms involved the establishment of ‘independent adjudicative authorities’, the CNIL (Commission Nationale del’ Informatique et des Libertés) and the CADA (Commission d’Accès aux Documents Administratifs), to rule on disputes concerning the right of access to computerisedfiles (CNIL) and other files and documents (CADA) independently of government.

9 Chevallier, note 6.

10 Jean-Pierre, D., ‘The Reaffirmation of Ethics and Professionalism in the French Public Service’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 1997, pp. 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Mény, Y., ‘Corruption French style’, in Little, W. and Posada-Carbo, E. (eds), Political Corruption in Europe and Latin America, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar

12 Pollitt, C., ‘Antistatist Reforms and New Administrative Directions: Public Administration in the United Kingdom’, Public Administration Review, 56:1, 1996, pp. 81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Finlayson, A., ‘Third Way Theory’, Political Quarterly, 70:3 (1999), pp. 271–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Clark, D., ‘Open Government in Britain: Discourse and Practice’, Public Money and Management, 16:1 (1996), pp. 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 See Page, A., ‘The Citizen’s Charter and Administrative Justice’, in Harris, M. and Partington, M. (eds), Administrative Justice in the 21st Century, Oxford, Hart, 1999.Google Scholar

16 Finlayson, , note 13; and Jobert, B. and Théret, B., ‘France: la consécration républicaine du néo-libéralisme’, in Jobert, B. (ed.), Le Tournant Néo-Liberal en Europe, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1994.Google Scholar

17 Arguably, the launch of the Charte des Services Publics may have more to do with the decision to create the new post of Secretary of State for Administrative Reform, and to reinforce the image of the post-holder (initially Jean-Pierre Soisson and then Michel Delebarre) as a policy entrepreneur with credentials in the field of administrative reform.

18 Hall, P., ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State’, Comparative Politics, 25:2 (1993), pp. 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Clark, G., ‘Real Regulation: The Administrative State’, Environment andPlanning A, 24 (1992) p. 616.Google Scholar

20 Organizational design and administrative regulation constitute ‘institutions’ inPierson’s sense of ‘establish(ing) the rules of the game for political struggles’. See Pierson, P., ‘The New Politics of the Welfare State’, World Politics, 48, 1996, p. 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Dyson, K., The State Tradition in Western Europe, Oxford, Martin Robertson, 1982.Google Scholar

22 Oldfield, A., ‘Citizenship: An Unnatural Practice?, Political Quarterly, 61:2 (1990),pp. 177–87.Google Scholar

23 Bellamy, R. and Greenaway, J., ‘The New Right Conception of Citizenship and the Citizen’s Charter’, Government and Opposition, 30:4 (1995), pp. 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 See the discussion in Howard, D., ‘The French Strikes of 1995 and their Political Aftermath’, Government and Opposition, 33:2 (1998), pp. 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Chevallier, J., Le Service Public, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1987.Google Scholar

26 Page, A., ‘Toolboxes and Blueprints: Controlling the Executive and the New Administrative Law’, in Daintith, T. (ed.), Constitutional Implications of Executive Self-Regulation: the New Administrative Law, London, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies,1997 Google Scholar. Partington, in his comments on Page’s paper, prefers to use the term ‘administrative justice’ to describe this system of ‘soft law’ norms (Daintith, p. 70).

27 Cooper, D., ‘The Citizen’s Charter and Radical Democracy: Empowerment and Exclusion within Citizenship Discourse’, Social and Legal Studies, 2:2 (1993), p. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 See Painter, C., ‘Public Service Reform from Thatcher to Blair: A Third Way’, Parliamentary Affairs, 52:1 (1999), p. 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Jobert and Théret (note 16).

30 Blanc, C., Pour un Etat Stratège, Garant de l’Intérêt Général, Paris, La DocumentationFrançaise, 1993.Google Scholar

31 Clark, D., ‘The modernization of the French civil service: crisis, change and continuity’, Public Administration, 76:1 (1998), pp. 97–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The Juppé Plan was a controversial package of measures of welfare retrenchment and structural reform of the health and social security systems, weakening paritarisme. Parts of it were withdrawn following vigorous trade union resistance, but it succeeded in strengthening the presence of the state in the health care policy community.

32 Palier, B., ‘La référence au territoire dans les nouvelles politiques sociales, Politiques et Management Public, 16:3 (1988), pp. 13–41 Google Scholar; and Schweyer, F.-X., ‘Larégulation régionale du système hospitalier: pilotage par l’Etat ou territorialisation?’,Politiques et Management Public, 16:3 (1998), pp. 43–68.Google Scholar

33 See S. Trosa, Moderniser l’Administration, Paris, Les Editions d’Organisations, 1995, p. 131; and Warin, P., ‘La performance publique: attentes des usagers et réponses des ministères’, Politiques et Management Public, 17:2 (1999), p. 161.Google Scholar

34 Meininger, M.-C., ‘Public Service, the Public’s Service’, in Gallouédec-Genuys, F., About French Administration, Paris, La Documentation Française, 1998.Google Scholar

35 Gilles Jeannot, Laboratoire Techniques, Territoires et Sociétés, Ecole Nationaledes Ponts et Chaussées. Personal commmunication to the author.

36 See also Denoix de Saint Marc, R., Le Service Public, Paris, La DocumentationFrançaise, 1996 Google Scholar. This report, by the vice-president of the Conseil d’Etat, was commissioned by the prime minister at a time when recent judgments of the European Court of Justice were calling into question some aspects of the French doctrine ofpublic service.

37 See the various contributions to Warin, P. (ed.), Quelle Modernisation des Services Publics’? Les Usagers au Coeur des Réformes, Paris, Editions de la Découverte, 1997.Google Scholar

38 van Zenten, A., ‘Market Trends in the French School System: Overt Policy, Hidden Strategies, Actual Changes’, Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, 6:1 (1996),pp. 63–75.Google Scholar