Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:07:02.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changing Basis of Party Competition: Education, Authoritarian–Libertarian Values and Voting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Rune Stubager
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of social structure as a determinant of electoral behaviour has been debated across Western countries, with one side in the debate arguing that the rise of the electoral conflict between authoritarian–libertarian values reflects the diminishing importance of socio-structural factors. In contrast, this article shows, using a unique representative sample from Denmark, how this conflict has its roots in an opposition between high- and low-education groups that divide over authoritarian–libertarian values, have developed education-based identities and group consciousness, and are influenced by these factors to vote for parties, each mobilizing their side in the conflict – that is, that the authoritarian–libertarian conflict is based on an education cleavage. Documenting for the first time the influence of education-based identity and group consciousness on voting, these findings demonstrate that socio-structural factors – partly through the voters’ social identities and consciousness – continue to play an important role for electoral behaviour in Western countries. Likewise, the findings suggest that the conflict over authoritarian–libertarian values will have lasting importance for politics in these countries. The logical next step, therefore, will be to extend the analyses to the comparative level.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 48 , Issue 3: OLD AND NEW OPPOSITIONS IN CONTEMPORARY EUROPE Special Issue to Commemorate the Centenary of the Birth of Ghiţă Ionescu , July 2013 , pp. 372 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Rune Stubager is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at Aarhus University. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Albertazzi, D.Mueller, S. (2013), ‘Populism and Liberal Democracy: Populists in Government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland’, Government and Opposition, 48(3): 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S.Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Best, R. (2011), ‘The Declining Electoral Relevance of Traditional Cleavage Groups’, European Political Science Review, 3: 279–300.Google Scholar
Best, R. (2013), ‘How Party System Fragmentation has Altered Political Opposition in Western Democracies’, Government and Opposition, 48(3): 314–342.Google Scholar
Bovens, M.Wille, A. (2010), ‘The Education Gap in Participation and its Political Consequences’, Acta Politica, 45: 393–422.Google Scholar
Braun, M.Müller, W. (1997), ‘Measurement of Education in Comparative Research’, Comparative Social Research, 16: 163–201.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. (2013), ‘Nations, Classes, and the Politics of Professors: A Comparative Perspective’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (2000), ‘Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 30: 745–778.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J.Tanebaum, E. (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D.Stokes, D. (1969), Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E.Stokes, D.E. (1960), The American Voter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Casal Bértoa, F. (2013), ‘Post-Communist Politics: On the Divergence (and/or Convergence) of East and West’, Government and Opposition, 48(3): 398–433.Google Scholar
Clark, T.N.Lipset, S.M. (1991), ‘Are Social Classes Dying?’, Journal of Social Issues, 6: 397–410.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1959), Classes and Class Conflict in Industrial Society (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2002), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 3rd edn (New York: Chatham House).Google Scholar
Deegan-Krause, K. (2007), ‘New Dimensions of Political Cleavage’, in R.J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 538–556.Google Scholar
van Deth, J.W. (1995), ‘A Macro Setting for Micro Politics’, in J.W. van Deth and E. Scarbrough (eds), The Impact of Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 48–75.Google Scholar
Dey, E.L. (1996), ‘Undergraduate Political Attitudes: An Examination of Peer, Faculty, and Social Influences’, Research in Higher Education, 37: 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, J.K.Endersby, J.W. (2004), ‘Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research’, Electoral Studies, 23: 107–122.Google Scholar
Emler, N.Frazer, E. (1999), ‘Politics: The Education Effect’, Oxford Review of Education, 25: 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J.H.Portocarero, L. (1979), ‘Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden’, British Journal of Sociology, 30: 415–441.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1999), The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Evans, G. (2010), ‘Models, Measures and Mechanisms: An Agenda for Progress in Cleavage Research’, West European Politics, 33: 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. (2003), ‘Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism’, Political Psychology, 24: 41–74.Google Scholar
Flanagan, S.C. (1987), ‘Value Change in Industrial Societies’, American Political Science Review, 81: 1303–1319.Google Scholar
Flanagan, S.C.Lee, A.-R. (2003), ‘The New Politics, Culture Wars, and the Authoritarian–Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 36: 235–270.Google Scholar
Franklin, M.N. (2010), ‘Cleavage Research: A Critical Appraisal’, West European Politics, 33: 648–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goul Andersen, J. (1997), ‘Changing Class Cleavages’, in O. Borre and J. Goul Andersen (eds), Voting and Political Attitudes in Denmark (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press): 114–159.Google Scholar
Gross, N.Fosse, E. (2012), ‘Why are Professors Liberal?’, Theory and Society, 41: 127–168.Google Scholar
Hansen, K.M.Goul Andersen, J. (2013), ‘En samlet model for partivalg’, in R. Stubager, K.M. Hansen and J. Goul Andersen (eds), Krisevalg. Økonomien og folketingsvalget 2011 (Copenhagen: DJØF-Forlag): 187–208.Google Scholar
Harrits, G.S., Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L.Skjott-Larsen, J. (2009), ‘Class and Politics in Denmark: Are Both Old and New Politics Structured by Class?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32: 1–27.Google Scholar
Heatherington, M.J.Weiler, J.D. (2009), Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henjak, A. (2010), ‘Political Cleavages and Socio-economic Context: How Welfare Regimes and Historial Divisions Shape Political Cleavages’, West European Politics, 33: 474–504.Google Scholar
Houtman, D., Achterberg, P.Derks, A. (2008), Farewell to the Leftist Working Class (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997), Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. (1975), Centripetal Politics: Governments and the New Centres of Power (London: Hart-Davis, MacGibbon).Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E.Stubager, R. (2012), ‘Voting for the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe: The Role of Education’, in J. Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right (London: Routledge): 122–137.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, D.I. (2001), ‘Higher Education as an Arena for Political Socialisation: Myth or Reality?’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 24: 351–368.Google Scholar
Jenssen, A.T. (1993), Verdivalg: Ny Massepolitik i Norge (Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal).Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1994), The Transformation of European Social Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1995), The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Knutsen, O.Scarbrough, E. (1995), ‘Cleavage Politics’, in J.W. van Deth and E. Scarbrough (eds), The Impact of Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 492–523.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T. (2008), Western European Politics in the Age of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M.Rokkan, S. (1967), ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’, in S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (New York: Free Press): 1–64.Google Scholar
McDermott, M.L. (2009), ‘Voting for Myself: Candidate and Voter Group Associations over Time’, Electoral Studies, 28: 606–614.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2006), ‘Cleavages’, in R.S. Katz and W.J. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics (London: Sage): 371–375.Google Scholar
Nakhaie, M.R.Brym, R.J. (2011), ‘The Ideological Orientations of Canadian University Professors’, Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41: 18–33.Google Scholar
Pascarella, E.T.Terenzini, P.T. (1991), How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
Stephens, W.N.Long, C.S. (1970), ‘Education and Political Behavior’, Political Science Annual, 2: 3–33.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2008), ‘Education Effects on Authoritarian–Libertarian Values: A Question of Socialization’, British Journal of Sociology, 59: 327–350.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2009a), ‘Education-based Group Identity and Consciousness in the Authoritarian–Libertarian Value Conflict’, European Journal of Poltical Research, 48: 204–233.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2009b), ‘Hvem repræsenterer partierne?’, in J. Blom-Hansen and J. Elklit (eds), Perspektiver på politik (Aarhus: Academica): 38–43.Google Scholar
Stubager, R. (2010), ‘The Development of the Education Cleavage: Denmark as a Critical Case’, West European Politics, 33: 505–533.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1974), ‘Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour’, Social Science Information, 13: 65–93.Google Scholar
de Vries, C. (2013), ‘Ambivalent Europeans? Public Support for European Integration in East and West’, Government and Opposition, 48(3): 434–461.Google Scholar
van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P.Houtman, D. (2007), ‘Class is Not Dead – It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990)’, Politics & Society, 35: 403–426.Google Scholar
Weakliem, D.L. (2002), ‘The Effects of Education on Political Opinions: An International Study’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13: 141–157.Google Scholar
Weil, F.D. (1985), ‘The Variable Effects of Education on Liberal Attitudes: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of Anti-Semitism Using Public Opinion Survey Data’, American Sociological Review, 50: 458–474.Google Scholar
van de Werfhorst, H.de Graaf, N.D. (2004), ‘The Sources of Political Orientations in Post-Industrial Society: Social Class and Education Revisited’, British Journal of Sociology, 55: 211–235.Google Scholar