Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:04:28.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

White Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

J. E. Spence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1968 , pp. 254 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In any case why should Lesotho or Botswana be singled out for particular attention, given the fact that there are ‘many troubled areas of the world already in need of international supervision, while the dangers that may arise in relation to the former High Commission Territories would be of very minor consequence to the world at large. The verdict may sound harsh; but what would it profit Basutoland, Bechuanaland, or Swaziland if they lost the goodwill of the Republic and gained only an international guarantee of doubtful worth in exchange?’ (p. 90).