Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:55:46.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twenty‐Five Years of Socio‐Political Analysis: Notes and Reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ralf Dahrendorf
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS – SIT VENIA VERBO! – HAS TO DO with our experience of political development and its social foundations. Needless to say, our experience influences the way in which we see such development. It is not arrogant to add that this was never more true than in the changing circumstances of Europe in the last half-century.

A personal note may be regarded as generational, social, national as well. Before my eighteenth birthday I experienced both 20 July 1944 and the forced merger of Social Democrats and Communists in East Germany in the spring of 1946. In both cases, my father was in opposition, though in very different kinds of opposition. In the first instance, opposition from outside; being an insider, a member of the Reichstag, was a distant memory, though one to be revived at any moment, if the coup d'état succeeded. In the second instance, opposition from inside; a clear sense, as Deputy Chairman of the East German Social Democrats, that a new totalitarianism was just around the corner, after the brief euphoria of 1945. In both cases, moral victory and practical defeat, prison, exile. Such experiences need no interpretation.

Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 15 , Issue 3-4 , 01 July 1980 , pp. 308 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1959.

2 Coser, L., The Functions of Social Conflict, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956.Google Scholar

3 Lipset, S. M., Political Man, New York, Doubleday, 1960, p. 45.Google Scholar

4 Schelsky, H., ‘Die Bedeutung des Schichtungsbegriffes für die Analyse der gegenwärtigen deutschen Gesellschaft’, in Transactions of the Second World Congress of Sociology, Vol. 1, London, 1959.Google Scholar

5 Landshut, S., ‘Die Gegenwart im Lichte der Marxschen Lehre’, in Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts‐und Gesellschaftspolitik, Vol. 1, Tübingen, Mohr, 1956.Google Scholar

6 Bell, D., The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York, Basic Books, 1976, pp. 41–2.Google Scholar

7 Cf. Marshall, T. H., Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

8 Kornhauser, W., The Politics of Mass Society, Glencoe, Free Press, 1956.Google Scholar

9 Popper, K. R., The Open Society and Its Enemies, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1945.Google Scholar

10 Downs, A., An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, Harper, 1957.Google Scholar

11 Friedman, M., Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar

12 von Hayek, F., The Constitution of Liberty, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.Google Scholar

13 Aron, R., Eighteen Lectures on Industrial Society, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1967. Penser la Guerre, Clausewitz, Paris, Gallimard, 1976.Google Scholar

14 Schelsky, H., Wandlugen der deutschen Familie in der Gegenwart, Stuttgart, Enke, 1955, Die Arbeit tun die anderen, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar

15 Bell, D., The End of Ideology, Glencoe, Free Press, 1960, The Coming of Post‐Industrial Society, New York, Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

16 Schelsky, H., cf. p. 314 above. Sontheimer, K., Das Elend der Intellektuellen.Google Scholar

17 Beckerman, W., In Defence of Economic Growth, London, Cape, 1974, ch. 2. Cf. also Mishan, E. J., The Economic Growth Debate, London, Allen & Unwin, 1977.Google Scholar

18 For both, see Crozier, M. J., Huntington, S., Watanabe, J., The Crisis of Democracy, New York University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

19 Tony Benn, Arguments for Socialism, London, Cape, 1979.Google Scholar

20 Habermas, J., Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt Suhrkamp, 1976, p. 310.Google Scholar