Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:28:14.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To Intervene or Not to Intervene? Democratic Constraints on Third-Party Support in Civil Wars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2020

Casper Sakstrup Open the ORCID record for Casper Sakstrup [Opens in a new window]  and
Jakob Tolstrup Open the ORCID record for Jakob Tolstrup [Opens in a new window]
Casper Sakstrup*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Jakob Tolstrup
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do democracies and autocracies differ when it comes to whether and how they provide third-party support to warring parties in civil wars? We argue that the political institutions of potential third-party states have important consequences for both questions. We emphasize how three particular institutional characteristics of democratic polities constrain decision-makers. This makes democracies less likely than autocracies to intervene in intra-state conflicts in general, and less likely to provide combat-intensive support specifically. An empirical analysis of incidents of third-party support to actors in civil wars in the period 1975–2009 corroborates the overall argument, although the results regarding support types are less clear. These results have important implications not only for our understanding of civil wars but also for how foreign policy decisions are made across different regime contexts.

Keywords

political regimesforeign policythird-party supportcivil war intervention
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 126 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aydin, A (2012) Foreign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aydin, A and Regan, PM (2012) Networks of Third-Party Interveners and Civil War Duration. European Journal of International Relations 18(3), 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch-Lindsay, D, Enterline, AJ and Joyce, KA (2008) Third-Party Intervention and the Civil War Process. Journal of Peace Research 45(3), 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmforth, T (2015) ‘Irreproachable’ Air Strikes: Russian Media Spin the Syria Offensive. RFE/RL Newsline, 1 October. www.rferl.org/a/syria-air-strikes-russia-media-spin/27281682.html.Google Scholar
Barbieri, K, Keshk, OMG and Pollins, BM (2009) Trading Data: Evaluating Our Assumptions and Coding Rules. Conflict Management and Peace Science 26(5), 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocharova, S, Mukametshina, E and Nikolski, A (2017) Яблоко» оценило войну в Сирии в 140 млрд рублей и требует раскрыть эти расходы. Vedomosti, 20 July. www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/07/20/724737-yabloko-voinu.Google Scholar
Bolton, JR (1994) Wrong Turn in Somalia. Foreign Affairs 73(1), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, H, Fuior, T and Lazzarini, C (2007) Study on Democratic Control of Armed Forces: What Acts or Issues Are under Control and When to Control? Chaillot Papers 389/2007. Strasbourg: Venice Commission. www.iss.europa.eu/content/democratic-control-armed-forces.Google Scholar
Bove, V, Gleditsch, KS and Sekeris, PG (2016) ‘Oil above Water’ Economic Interdependence and Third-Party Intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(7), 1251–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunk, DC (2008) Curing the Somalia Syndrome: Analogy, Foreign Policy Decision Making, and the Rwandan Genocide. Foreign Policy Analysis 4(3), 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B and Siverson, RM (1995) War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability. American Political Science Review 89(4), 841–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B et al. (1999) An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review 93(4), 791–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, J, Gandhi, J and Vreeland, J (2010) Democracy and Dictatorship Revisisted. Public Choice 143(1), 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, J (2015) Weapons, Security, and Oppression: A Normative Study of International Arms Transfers. Journal of Political Philosophy 23(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2016) Measuring High Level Democratic Principles Using the V-Dem Data. International Political Science Review 37(5), 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M et al. (2017) V-Dem Codebook V7, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. www.v-dem.net/en/data/archive/previous-data/data-version-7/.Google Scholar
Corbetta, R and Dixon, WJ (2005) Danger beyond Dyads: Third-Party Participants in Militarized Interstate Disputes. Conflict Management and Peace Science 22(1), 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correlates of War Project (2016) State System Membership List Codebook. Version 2016.Google Scholar
Cunningham, DE (2010) Blocking Resolution: How External States Can Prolong Civil Wars. Journal of Peace Research 47(2), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, DE, Gleditsch, KS and Salehyan, I (2013) Non-State Actors in Civil Wars: A New Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 30(5), 516–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mesquita, BB and Downs, GW (2006) Intervention and Democracy. International Organization 60(3), 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, JD (1997) Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findley, MG and Teo, TK (2006) Rethinking Third-Party Interventions into Civil Wars: An Actor-Centric Approach. Journal of Politics 68(4), 828–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, SS (2008) The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach. American Political Science Review 102(1), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, SS and Gelpi, CF (2016) The Affect and Effect of Images of War on Individual Opinion and Emotions. International Interactions 42(1), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, C (2017) Democracies in Conflict: The Role of Public Opinion, Political Parties, and the Press in Shaping Security Policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(9), 1925–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, C, Feaver, P and Reifler, JA (2009) Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, DM (2009) International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Correlates of War Series. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, KS and Ward, MD (1999) A Revised List of Independent States since the Congress of Vienna. International Interactions 25(4), 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, NP et al. (2002) Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39(5), 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, OS and Abulof, U (2016) Democracy for the Rescue – of Dictators? The Role of Regime Type in Civil War Interventions. Contemporary Security Policy 37(3), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, MJ and Ozan Kalkan, K (2013) Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J (2009) Identity and Securitization in the Democratic Peace: The United States and the Divergence of Response to India and Iran's Nuclear Programs. International Studies Quarterly 53(4), 977–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, PR. (2014) ICOW Colonial History Data Set, Version 1.0. www.paulhensel.org/icowcol.html.Google Scholar
Högbladh, S, Pettersson, T and Themnér, L (2011) External Support in Armed Conflict 1975–2009: Presenting New Data. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual International Studies Association Convention, Montreal, Canada, March.Google Scholar
Karol, D and Miguel, E (2007) The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 US Presidential Election. Journal of Politics 69(3), 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathman, JD (2010) Civil War Contagion and Neighboring Interventions. International Studies Quarterly 54(4), 989–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathman, JD (2011) Civil War Diffusion and Regional Motivations for Intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(6), 847–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, SK (2017) Third-Party Intervention in Civil Wars and the Prospects for Postwar Development. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(3), 615–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinne, BJ (2005) Decision Making in Autocratic Regimes: A Poliheuristic Perspective. International Studies Perspectives 6(1), 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, J (2011) Where Do Third Parties Intervene? Third Parties’ Domestic Institutions and Military Interventions in Civil Conflicts. International Studies Quarterly 55(4), 1143–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, B and Slater, D (2006) Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992. American Journal of Political Science 50(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, J (2015) Hidden in Plain Sight: Political Opposition and Hegemonic Authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Post-Soviet Affairs 31(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, D and Regan, PM (2004) Interventions as Influence. In Diehl, P (ed.), The Scourge of War: New Extensions on an Old Problem. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 145–168.Google Scholar
Maoz, Z and Russett, B (1993) Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review 87(3), 624–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Z and San-Akca, B (2012) Rivalry and State Support of Non-State Armed Groups (NAGs), 1946–2001. International Studies Quarterly 56(4), 720–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, MG, Gurr, TR and Jaggers, K (2017) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2016. Dataset Users’ Manual. www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Pearson, FS and Baumann, RA (1993) International Military Intervention, 1946–1988: Version 1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, J and Kisangani, EF (2009) The International Military Intervention Dataset: An Updated Resource for Conflict Scholars. Journal of Peace Research 46(4), 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, PM (1998) Choosing to Intervene: Outside Interventions in Internal Conflicts. Journal of Politics 60(3), 754–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, PM (2002) Third-Party Interventions and the Duration of Intrastate Conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, PM, Frank, RW and Aydin, A (2009) Diplomatic Interventions and Civil War: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 46(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters (2017) Russia in Syria: Putin Counts Cost of Campaign after Rise in Death Toll. Newsweek, 2 August. www.newsweek.com/russia-lost-40-fighters-syria-casualties-mount-645266.Google Scholar
Ross, M and Mahdavi, P (2015) Oil and Gas Data, 1932–2014. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ZTPW0Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, B (1994) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehyan, I, Gleditsch, KS and Cunningham, DE (2011) Explaining External Support for Insurgent Groups. International Organization 65(4), 709–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San-Akca, B (2016) States in Disguise: Causes of State Support for Rebel Groups. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, K, Cunningham, KG and Reed, W (2017) The Role of External Support in Civil War Termination. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(6), 1174–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, E and Kramer, AE (2017) Pentagon and State Department Said to Propose Arming Ukraine. New York Times, 1 August. www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/world/europe/pentagon-and-state-department-are-said-to-propose-arming-ukraine.html.Google Scholar
Schmitt, MN (2014) Legitimacy versus Legality Redux: Arming the Syrian Rebels. Journal of National Security Law & Policy 7, 139.Google Scholar
Schultz, KA (1998) Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises. American Political Science Review 92(4), 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, KA (1999) Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War. International Organization 53(2), 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, JD, Bremer, S and Stuckey, J (1972) Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Russett, B (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 19–48.Google Scholar
Stier, S (2015) Democracy, Autocracy and the News: The Impact of Regime Type on Media Freedom. Democratization 22(7), 1273–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockmann, D and Gallagher, ME (2011) Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies 44(4), 436–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojek, SM and Chacha, M (2015) Adding Trade to the Equation: Multilevel Modeling of Biased Civil War Interventions. Journal of Peace Research 52(2), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, MW (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, MR and Weeks, JLP (2013) Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace. American Political Science Review 107(4), 849–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treier, S and Jackman, S (2008) Democracy as a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 52(1), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, JL (2012) Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict. American Political Science Review 106(2), 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, NB, Kuse, D and Gleditsch, KS (2010) The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset. International Interactions 36(1), 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, RM, Kathman, JD and Gent, SE (2012) Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 49(5), 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sakstrup and Tolstrup supplementary material

Sakstrup and Tolstrup supplementary material

Download Sakstrup and Tolstrup supplementary material(File)
File 216.6 KB