Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:57:50.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Still an Opaque Institution? Explaining Decision-Making in the EU Council Using Newspaper Information: A Reply to Sullivan and Veen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2009.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Robert Thomson, Frans N. Stokman, Christopher H. Achen and Thomas König (eds), The European Union Decides, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

2 Sara Hagemann and Julia De Clerck-Sachsse, ‘Old Rules, New Game: Decision-Making in the Council of Ministers After the 2004 Enlargement’, CEPS Special Report, March 2007, p. 2.Google Scholar

3 Sullivan, Jonathan and Selck, Torsten J., ‘Political Preferences, Revealed Positions and Strategic Votes: Explaining Decision-Making in the EU Council’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14: 7 (2007), pp. 1150–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Sullivan, Jonathan and Veen, Tim, ‘The EU Council: Shedding Light on an Opaque Institution’, Government and Opposition, 44: 1 (2009), pp. 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Ibid, p. 118.Google Scholar

7 See e.g. Semetko, Holli A., Van Der Brug, Wouter and Valkenburg, Patti M., ‘The Influence of Political Events on Attitudes Towards the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 4 (2003), pp. 621–34;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Hans-Jörg Trenz, ‘Media Coverage of European Governance; Exploring the European Public Sphere in National Quality Newspapers’, European Journal of Communication, 19: 3 (2004), pp. 291–319.

8 Jan Kleinnijenhuis and Paul Pennings, ‘Measurement of Party Positions on the Basis of Party Programmes, Media Coverage and Voter Perceptions’, in Michael Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, London, Routledge, 2001, pp. 162–82.Google Scholar

9 Hörl, Björn, Warntjern, Andreas and Wonka, Arndt, ‘Built on Quick Sand? A Decade of Procedural Spatial Models on EU Legislative Decision-Making’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 3 (2005), p. 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Sullivan and Selck, ‘Political Preferences’, p. 1151.Google Scholar

11 See Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001.Google Scholar

13 Hagemann, Sara, ‘Applying Ideal Point Estimation Methods to the Council of Ministers’, European Union Politics, 8: 2 (2007), pp. 282–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Sullivan and Veen, ‘The EU Council’, p. 119.Google Scholar

15 König, Thomas, Luetgert, Brooke and Dannwolf, Tanja, ‘Quantifying European Legislative Research: Using CELEX and PreLex in EU Legislative Studies’, European Union Politics, 7: 4 (2006), p. 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Note that ‘non-political’ does not mean that these are unbiased. We merely use the term here to differentiate newspaper reporting from political text such as party manifestos and political speeches.Google Scholar

17 David R. Mayhew, Divided We Govern: Party Control, Law-Making and Investigations 1946–1990, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1991, p. 37.Google Scholar

18 Ibid.Google Scholar

19 Ibid.Google Scholar

20 Matthew Gentzhow and Jesse M. Shapiro, ‘What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers’, 13 November 2006, at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=947640, p. 5.Google Scholar

21 Sendhil Mullainathan and Andrei Shleifer, ‘The Market for News’, 30 December 2003, at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=485724.Google Scholar

25 ‘Informal Competitiveness Council: Services Directive Key Item at Graz Ministerial’, Europolitics, 21 April 2006.Google Scholar