Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:15:44.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social and Political Citizenship in European Public Opinion: An Empirical Analysis of T.H. Marshall’s Concept of Social Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Abstract

Normative democratic theory assumes that political systems should ensure civil, political and social rights, and this claim has become more salient since the economic crisis that began in 2008. This conception of citizenship was developed most prominently by T.H. Marshall (1950), and it has been further elaborated by numerous other authors, resulting in a clear division between procedural/electoral democracy concepts and authors emphasizing egalitarian concepts of democracy. We use latent class analysis to assess democratic ideals among European citizens as reported in the 2012 European Social Survey. The findings demonstrate that a majority of Europeans consider political and social rights as equally important, while some citizens predominantly emphasize either political or social rights. Furthermore, the focus on social rights is not limited to those with left-leaning ideologies. Considering current manifestations of discontent about the politics of austerity, we discuss the implications of social citizenship concepts for democratic legitimacy in Europe.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Marc Hooghe is Professor of Political Science at the University of Leuven. Contact email: [email protected].

Jennifer Oser is Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Agresti, A. (2007), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley).Google Scholar
Anderson, C.J. and Singer, M.M. (2008), ‘The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Models and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5): 564599.Google Scholar
Ariely, G. (2011), ‘Exploring Citizenship Spheres of Inclusion/Exclusion: Rights as “Potential For Power”’, Patterns of Prejudice, 45(3): 241258.Google Scholar
Arts, W.A. and Gelissen, J. (2002), ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 137158.Google Scholar
Banting, K. and Myles, J. (2013) (eds), Inequality and the Fading of Redistributive Politics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).Google Scholar
Beetham, D. (1999), Democracy and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Å. and Christensen, H. (2016), ‘Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to their Conceptions of Democracy?’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 51(2): 234260.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (2006), Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bermeo, N. and Bartels, L. (2014) (eds), Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. and Rees, A. (1996) (eds), Citizenship Today: The Contemporary Relevance of T.H. Marshall (London: UCL Press).Google Scholar
Collins, L.M. and Lanza, S.T. (2010), Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley).Google Scholar
Connell, A. (2012), ‘Civil Rights and Social Welfare: Some Thoughts on the Contemporary Relevance of T.H. Marshall’, Political Quarterly, 83(3): 551559.Google Scholar
Cordero, G. and Simón, P. (2016), ‘Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe’, West European Politics, 39(2): 305325.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2008), ‘Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation’, Political Studies, 56(1): 7698.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. and Welzel, C. (2014) (eds), The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Danforth, B. and Stephens, J. (2013), ‘Measuring Social Citizenship: Achievements and Future Challenges’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(9): 12851298.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. (2013), Can Democracy be Saved? Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Doorenspleet, R. (2015), ‘Where Are the People? A Call for People-Centred Concepts and Measurements of Democracy’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 50(3): 469494.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000), Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
ESS (2012), European Social Survey Round 6 (ESS-6) 2012, Data File Edition 2.1 (Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1992), ‘Contract Versus Charity. Why is there No Social Citizenship in the United States?’, Socialist Review, 22(1): 4568.Google Scholar
Goodman, L.A. (2007), ‘Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity: An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 119.Google Scholar
Greer, S.L. and Jarman, H. (2016), ‘European Citizenship Rights and European Fiscal Politics After the Crisis’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, published early online, March, doi: 10.1017/gov.2016.2.Google Scholar
Hagenaars, J.A. and McCutcheon, A.L. (2002) (eds), Applied Latent Class Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Jæger, M. (2006), ‘Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited’, European Sociological Review, 22(2): 157170.Google Scholar
Kankaraš, M. and Vermunt, J.K. (2014), ‘Simultaneous Latent Class Analysis Across Groups’, in A.C. Michalos (ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (Heidelberg: Springer): 59695974.Google Scholar
Kankaraš, M., Moors, G. and Vermunt, J.K. (2010), ‘Testing for Measurement Invariance with Latent Class Analysis’, in E. Davidov, P. Schmidt and J. Billiet (eds), Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications (New York: Routledge): 359384.Google Scholar
Kern, A., Marien, S. and Hooghe, M. (2015), ‘Economic Crisis and Levels of Political Participation in Europe, 2002–2010’, West European Politics, 38(3): 464489.Google Scholar
King, D.S. and Waldron, J. (1988), ‘Citizenship, Social Citizenship and the Defence of Welfare Provision’, British Journal of Political Science, 18(4): 415443.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1989), ‘Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights during Sickness in 18 OECD Countries’, American Sociological Review, 54(3): 309328.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization’, American Political Science Review, 97(3): 425446.Google Scholar
Lister, M. (2005), ‘“Marshall-ing” Social and Political Citizenship: Towards a Unified Conception of Citizenship’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 40(4): 471491.Google Scholar
LIS (2015), ‘Luxembourg Income Survey: Inequality and Poverty Key Figures’, www.lisdatacenter.org/lis-ikf-webapp/app/search-ikf-figures.Google Scholar
Magidson, J. and Vermunt, J.K. (2004), ‘Latent Class Models’, in D. Kaplan (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences (London: Sage): 175198.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R. and Jaggers, K. (2013), POLITY IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013 (Vienna: Center for Systemic Peace), www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1964), Class, Citizenship, and Social Development (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Meyer, T. (2007), The Theory of Social Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1999), Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Møller, J. and Skaaning, S.-E. (2010), ‘Marshall Revisited: The Sequence of Citizenship Rights in the Twenty-First Century’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 45(4): 457483.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (1993) (eds), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1983), ‘Competitive Party Democracy and the Keynesian Welfare State: Factors of Stability and Disorganization’, Policy Sciences, 15(3): 225246.Google Scholar
Pietsch, J, Miller, M. and Karp, J. (2015), ‘Public Support for Democracy in Transitional Regimes’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(1): 19.Google Scholar
Raftery, A.E. (1995), ‘Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research’, Sociological Methodology, 25: 111163.Google Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van Oorschot, W. (2013), ‘Equity, Equality, or Need? A Study of Popular Preferences for Welfare Redistribution Principles Across 24 European Countries’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8): 11741195.Google Scholar
Revi, B. (2014), ‘TH Marshall and his Critics: Reappraising “Social Citizenship” in the Twenty-First Century’, Citizenship Studies, 18(3–4): 452464.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (2000), Equality of Opportunity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rüdig, W. and Karyotis, G. (2014), ‘Who Protests in Greece? Mass Opposition to Austerity’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(3): 487513.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (1998), The Terms of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. and Streeck, W. (2013) (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
Soroka, S. and Wlezien, C. (2014), ‘Economic Crisis and Support for Redistribution in the United Kingdom’, in N. Bermeo and L. Bartels (eds), Mass Politics in Tough Times (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 105127.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Mertens, D. (2013), ‘Public Finance and the Decline of State Capacity in Democratic Capitalism’, in A. Schäfer and W. Streeck (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity (Cambridge: Polity Press): 2628.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.P. (1971), ‘The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century’, Past & Present, 50: 76136.Google Scholar
Torcal, M., Rodon, T. and Hierro, M.J. (2016), ‘Word on the Street: The Persistence of Leftist-dominated Protest in Europe’, West European Politics, 39(2): 326350.Google Scholar
Turner, B.S. (2001), ‘The Erosion of Citizenship’, British Journal of Sociology, 52(2): 189209.Google Scholar
Van Deth, J.W. (2007), ‘Norms of Citizenship’, in R.J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 402417.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J.K. and Magidson, J. (2002), ‘Latent Class Cluster Analysis’, in J.A. Hagenaars and A.L. McCutcheon (eds), Applied Latent Class Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press): 89106.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. and Miller, D. (1995), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Weingast, B. (1997), ‘The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of the Law’, American Political Science Review, 91(2): 245263.Google Scholar
Welzel, C. (2013), Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hooghe and Oser supplementary material

Appendix

Download Hooghe and Oser supplementary material(File)
File 80.4 KB