No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
WE TAKE IT FOR GRANTED THAT THE SURVIVAL OF THE STATE DEPENDS on democratic consent. With the demise of Marxism and fascism, Diamond suggests that, apart from Islamic fundamentalism, democracy is the only model with ideological legitimacy. And Fukuyama asserts that ‘the democratic transitions of the past generation could not have occurred had not populations around the world finally become conscious of the fact that liberal democracy alone provides the possibility of fully rational recognition of human dignity’.
1 Diamond, L., Introduction to Diamond, L., Lipset, S. M. and Linz, J. J. (eds), Politics in Developing Countries, Boulder, Colo., Rienner, 1995, p. 1.Google ScholarPubMed
2 Fukuyama, F., ‘Liberal Democracy as a Global Phenomenon’, Political Studies, 12 1991, p. 661 Google Scholar. Emphasis added.
3 Norton, P., The British Polity, Harlow, Longman, 1994, p. 373 Google Scholar.
4 ibid., p. 379.
5 ibid.
6 Miller, W. L., Timpson, A. M. and Lessnoff, M., Political Culture in Contemporary Britain, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996, p. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 ibid., p. 33.
8 Boyle, E., ‘Guerilla Tactics to Keep Dallas out of Dorking’, The Listener; 11 10 1984 , pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
9 The Guardian, 22 November 1995, pp. 2–5, quoting J. Curtice and R. Jowell.
10 ibid., p. 2.
11 Parry, G., Moyser, G. and Day, N., Political Participation and Democracy in Britain, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1994, p. 423.Google Scholar
12 ibid., p. 44.
13 The Guardian, 22 November 1995, p. 2.
14 Miller et al., op. cit., pp. 39–40.
15 Kymlickac, W. and Norman, W., ‘Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Works on Citizenship Theory’, Ethics, Vol. 104, 01 1994, p. 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 ibid., p. 353.
17 ibid., pp. 356–7.
18 Grahl, J. and Teague, P., ‘Economic Citizenship in the New Europe’, Political Quarterly, Vol. 65, No. 4, 10 1994, p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Bellamy, R. and Greenaway, J., ‘The New Right Conception of Citizenship and the Citizen’s Charter’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 50, No. 4, Autumn 1995, pp. 464–91Google Scholar; Deakin, N., ‘Accentuating the apostrophe: The Citizen’s Charter’, Policy Studis, Vol. 15, No. 3, Autumn 1994, pp. 48–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson, J., ‘Citizen Major: The Rationale and Impact of the Citizen’s Charter’, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 11, No. 1, Spring 1996, pp. 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Koopmans, R., ‘New Social Movements and Changes in Politcal Participation in Western Europe’, West European Politics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01 1996, p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Putnam, R. D., ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 12 1995, p. 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Verba, S., Schlozman, S. and Brady, H. E., Voice and Equality: Civic Volunlarism in American Politics, London, Harvard University Press, 1995, p. 67 Google Scholar.
23 Dahl, R. A., ‘A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness Versus Citizen Participation’, Political Studits Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 1, Spring 1994, pp. 32–3.Google Scholar
24 ibid., p. 32.
25 ibid., p. 31.
26 Grahl and Teague, op. cit., p. 395.
27 Etzioni, A., ‘Positive Aspects of Community and the Danger of Fragmentation’, Development and Change, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1996, pp. 301–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 ibid., p. 302.
29 Sandel, M. J., Democracy’s Discontent, London, Harvard University Press, 1996, p. 314.Google Scholar
30 ibid., pp. 314–15.
31 ibid., p. 350.
32 See especially Grahl and Teague, op. cit., pp. 386–91.
33 ibid., p. 391.
34 Dahl, op. cit., p. 33.
35 Quoted by Sandel, op. cit., pp. 215–16.