Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:08:39.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of External Actors in Incentivizing Post-Conflict Power-Sharing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2013

Joanne McEvoy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

External actors engaged in peace building often induce domestic elites to share power. This article explores the effectiveness of external incentives in establishing, maintaining or reforming power-sharing. Adopting a rationalist approach to socialization, the research investigates the strategic interaction between external and internal actors in two cases of contemporary power-sharing: Northern Ireland and Bosnia-Herzegovina. External incentives will probably be more effective when they uphold a peace agreement that satisfies groups’ structural preferences on constitutional issues. External incentives can, under certain conditions, lead to internalization and the potential ‘habitualization’ of power-sharing as norm-conforming behaviour. The strategy of external actors will be less effective when their socialization efforts are inconsistent and coercive, viewed as threatening to one or more of the contending groups.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 47 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Joanne McEvoy is a Lecturer in Politics in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Aberdeen. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Adams, G. (2003), Hope and History: Making Peace in Ireland (London: Mount Eagle Publications).Google Scholar
Ahern, B. (2000), ‘Article by the Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern’, Irish Times, 14 February.Google Scholar
Anglo-Irish Agreement (1985), ‘Agreement Between the Government of Ireland and the Government of the United Kingdom’, http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/events/aia/aiadoc.htm.Google Scholar
Bieber, F. (2008), ‘Power-Sharing and International Intervention: Overcoming the Post-Conflict Legacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, in M. Weller and B. Metzger (eds), Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV): 193–241.Google Scholar
Bildt, C. (1998), Peace Journey: The Struggle for Peace in Bosnia (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar
Blair, T. (2010), A Journey (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Bose, S. (2006), ‘The Bosnian State a Decade after Dayton’, in D. Chandler (ed.), Peace without Politics? Ten Years of International State-Building in Bosnia (London and New York: Routledge): 16–29.Google Scholar
British–Irish Agreement (1998), ‘Agreement Between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Ireland’, http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/events/peace/docs/agreement.htm#annex.Google Scholar
Chandler, D (2006), ‘From Dayton to Europe’, in D. Chandler (ed.), Peace without Politics? Ten Years of International State-Building in Bosnia (London and New York: Routledge): 30–43.Google Scholar
Checkel, J.T. (2001), ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change’, International Organization, 55(3): 553–588.Google Scholar
Checkel, J.T. (2005), ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework’, International Organization, 59: 801–826.Google Scholar
Clancy, M.-A.C. (2010), Peace without Consensus: Power Sharing Politics in Northern Ireland (Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Coakley, J. (2001), ‘The Belfast Agreement and the Republic of Ireland’, in R. Wilford (ed.), Aspects of the Belfast Agreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 223–244.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009), ‘Progress Report Conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina’, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2009/conclusions_on_bih_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Faulkner, B. (1978), Memoirs of a Statesman (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar
Holbrooke, R. (1998), To End a War (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group) (2005), Bosnia's Stalled Police Reform: No Progress, No EU, Europe Report 164, 6 September.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group) (2007), Ensuring Bosnia's Future: A New International Engagement Strategy, Europe Report 180, 15 February.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group) (2009a), Bosnia's Dual Crisis, Europe Briefing 57, 12 November.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group) (2009b), Bosnia's Incomplete Transition: Between Dayton and Europe, Europe Report 198, 9 March.Google Scholar
ICG (International Crisis Group) (2011), Bosnia: State Institutions under Attack, Europe Briefing 62, 6 May.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J.Kupchan, C.A. (1990), ‘Socialization and Hegemonic Power’, International Organization, 44(3): 283–315.Google Scholar
Kelley, J.G. (2004), Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kerr, M. (2005), Imposing Power-Sharing: Conflict and Coexistence in Northern Ireland and Lebanon (Dublin: Irish Academic Press).Google Scholar
Kerr, M. (2011), The Destructors: The Story of Northern Ireland's Lost Peace Process (Dublin: Irish Academic Press).Google Scholar
Knaus, G.Martin, F. (2003), ‘The Travails of the European Raj: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Journal of Democracy, 14(3): 60–74.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Lindblom, C.E. (1959), ‘The Science of “Muddling Through”’, Public Administration Review, 19: 79–88.Google Scholar
McGarry, J., O'Leary, B.Simeon, R. (2008), ‘Integration or Accommodation? The Enduring Debate in Conflict Regulation’, in S. Choudhry (ed.), Constitutional Design for Divided Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 41–88.Google Scholar
Mandelson, P. (2010), The Third Man: Life at the Heart of New Labour (London: Harper).Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., Evans, G.O'Leary, B. (2009), ‘Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 57(2): 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northern Ireland Office (1972), The Future of Northern Ireland: A Paper for Discussion (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
Noutcheva, G. (2009), ‘Fake, Partial and Imposed Compliance: The Limits of the EU's Normative Power in the Western Balkans’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(7): 1065–1084.Google Scholar
O'Duffy, B. (2007), British–Irish Relations and Northern Ireland (Dublin: Irish Academic Press).Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. (1997), ‘The Conservative Stewardship of Northern Ireland, 1979–97: Sound-bottomed Contradictions or Slow Learning?’, Political Studies, 46(5): 853–870.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. (1999), ‘The Nature of the Agreement’, Fordham Journal of International Law, 22(4): 1628–1667.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. (2004), ‘The Labour Government and Northern Ireland, 1974–9’, in J. McGarry and B. O'Leary, The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 194–216.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. (2005), ‘Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments’, in S. Noel (ed.), From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies (Montreal, Kingston, London and Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen's University Press): 3–43.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B.McGarry, J. (1993), The Politics of Antagonism: Understanding Northern Ireland (London: Athlone Press).Google Scholar
OHR (Office of the High Representative) (2003), ‘Hard Work and Confidence Will Take BiH from Dayton to Brussels’, press release, 3 December, www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/presso/pressr/default.asp?content_id=31296.Google Scholar
OHR (Office of the High Representative) (2006), ‘HR/EUSR Comments on Failure to Adopt Constitutional Amendments’, press release, 17 April, www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/presso/pressr/default.asp?content_id=37070.Google Scholar
OHR (Office of the High Representative) (2007a), ‘Lajčák: Without Police Reform, the Door to the EU Will be Closed’, interview, Lidove Noviny, 21 September.Google Scholar
OHR (Office of the High Representative) (2007b), ‘Decision Enacting the Law on Changes and Amendments to the Law on the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina’, 19 October, www.ohr.int/decisions/statemattersdec/default.asp?content_id=40687.Google Scholar
Peace Implementation Council (1997), ‘Bonn Conclusions’, 10 December, www.ohr.int/pic/default.asp?content_id=5182#11.Google Scholar
Peace Implementation Council (2008), ‘Declaration by the Steering Board of the Peace Implementation Council’, 27 February, www.ohr.int/pic/default.asp?content_id=41352.Google Scholar
Police (Northern Ireland) Bill (2000), http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/police/policeact/bill2000.htm.Google Scholar
Powell, J. (2008), Great Hatred, Little Room (London: Bodley Head).Google Scholar
Risse, T., Ropp, S.C.Sikkink, K. (1999) (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2000), ‘International Socialization in the New Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(1): 109–139.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2005), ‘Strategic Calculation and International Socialization’, International Organization, 59: 827–860.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S.Knobel, H. (2003), ‘Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3): 495–518.Google Scholar
SDLP (Social Democratic and Labour Party) (2000), statement on the Police (NI) Bill, 16 May 2000, http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/police/policeact/sm16500.htm.Google Scholar
Sinn Féin (2000), statement in response to the Police (NI) Bill, 16 May 2000, http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/police/policeact/ga16500.htm.Google Scholar
Szewczyk, B.M.J. (2010), The EU in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Powers, Decisions and Legitimacy (Paris: European Union Institute of Security Studies), www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/OccasionalPaper83.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (2009), ‘Introduction: The Promise of Consociational Theory’, in R. Taylor (ed.), Consociational Theory: McGarry and O'Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict (Abingdon and New York: Routledge): 1–12.Google Scholar
Venice Commission (European Commission for Democracy through Law) (2005), ‘Opinion on the Constitutional Situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Powers of the High Representative’, CDL-AD (2005) 004, 11 March, http://venice.coe.int.Google Scholar
Wilford, R. (2010), ‘Northern Ireland: The Politics of Constraint’, Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1): 134–155.Google Scholar