Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:02:57.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Renewal of the Radical Right: Between Modernity and Anti‐modernity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Michael Minkenberg
Michael Minkenberg*
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science at the Europa‐Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt Oder)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

FIFTY-FIVE YEARS AFTER THE FALL OF FASCISM AND THE END OF THE Second World War, right-wing radical movements and parties are part of the political normalcy in many Western democracies. In the face of the twentieth-century experiences of fascism and state socialism, and their failures, this stubborn persistence seems at the same time anachronistic and frightening. While there is no shortage of explanations and interpretations of this phenomenon in an evergrowing body of literature, most studies focus on national trends and derive their criteria from country-specific histories and discourses. Serious comparative scholarship on the radical right is still in its infancy.

This article is a plea for more comparative research on rightwing radicalism at the turn of the century. It begins by highlighting the three central dimensions of the problem. First, one must state that contemporary right-wing radicalism is an international phenomenon. Thus, more than before, comparative studies are needed both to analyse the international quality and to specify the nation-specific characteristics of the radical right in each country. Secondly, it must be borne in mind that contemporary right-wing radicalism is a modern phenomenon. It has undergone a phase of renewal, as a result of social and cultural modernization shifts in post-war Europe. Thus it is only vaguely connected with previous versions. Terms like ‘fascism’ or ‘neo-fascism’ which suggest a historical continuity from Munich to Mölln and Magdeburg in Germany, or from Vichy to Vitrolles in France, become increasingly obsolete. The third factor to bear in mind is that contemporary right-wing radicalism is a complex phenomenon. The ongoing specialization and compartmentalization in the social sciences, such as discourse analysis, party and electoral research, and youth sociology – to name but a few of the approaches applied to the radical right – fail to do justice to the complexity of the subject. Clearly, the many faces of right-wing radicalism require clear analytical distinctions, but ultimately they need to be approached in a truly interdisciplinary way.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2000 , pp. 170 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 So far, there are only four truly comparative studies of the contemporary radicalright: Betz, Hans-Georg, Radical Right-wing Populism in Western Europe, New York, St Martin’s Press, 1994;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Ignazi, Piero, L’estrema destra in Europa, Bologna, Mulino, 1994;Google Scholar Kitschelt, Herbert, The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1995;Google Scholar and Minkenberg, Michael, Die neue radikale Rechte im Vergleich, USA, Frankreich, Deutschland, Opladen/Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Needless to say, the number of scholarly essays and edited volumes with a comparative approach has significantly increased over the last ten years.

2 The argumentation is based on my own study, see Minkenberg, op. cit.

3 Falter, Jürgen and Schumann, Siegfried, ‘Affinity towards Right-wing Extremism in Europe’, in Beyme, Klaus von (ed.), Right-wing Extremism in Western Europe, London, Frank Cass, 1988, pp. 96–110.Google Scholar

4 Mudde, Cas, ‘The War of Words Defining the Extreme Right Party Family’, in West European Politics, 19:2 (April 1996), p. 229.Google Scholar

5 Backes, Uwe and Jesse, Eckhard, Politischer Extremismus in Deutschland , Bonn, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 1989.Google Scholar

6 Heitmeyer, Wilhelm et al., Die Bielefelder Rechtsextremismus-Studie, Erste Langzeituntersuchung zur politischen Sozialisation männlicher Jugendlicher, 2nd edn.,Weinheim and Munich, Juventa, 1993.Google Scholar

7 Hans Georg Betz, op. cit.; Herbert Kitschelt, op. cit.

8 See Rucht, Dieter, Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen, Frankfurt and New York, Campus, 1994.Google Scholar

9 The term ‘ethnocracy’ is borrowed from Roger Griffin (personal communication).

10 Scheuch, Erwin and Klingermann, Hans Dieter, ‘Theorie des Rechtsradikalismusin westlichen Industriegesellschaften’, in Hamburger Jahrbuch filr Wirtschafts-undGeselhchaftspolitik, 12 (1967), pp. 11–29.Google Scholar

11 Bloch, Ernst, Erbschaft dieser Zeit, Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp, 1962, pp. 104–60.Google Scholar

12 Wippermann, Wolfgang, Europäischer Faschismus im Vergleich, 1922–1982, Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp, 1983, p. 183.Google Scholar

13 Beck, Ulrich, Risikogeselbchaft, Aufdem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp, 1986.Google Scholar

14 Inglehart, Ronald, Modernization and Post-Modernization, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

15 See Minkenberg, op. cit., pp. 239ff.

16 Lowi, Theodore, ‘American Impasse. The Ideological Dimension at Era’s End’, in Minkenberg, Michael and Dittgen, Herbert (eds), The American Impasse. US Domestic and Foreign Policy after the Cold War, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996,p. 6.Google Scholar

17 Kitschelt, op. cit., p. 52.

18 Quoted in Lowi, Theodore, The End of the Republican Era, Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma, 1995, p. 211.Google Scholar

19 Taguieff, Pierre-André, La force du préjugé, Paris, Editions la Découverte, 1987.Google Scholar

20 Klönne, Arno, ‘Aufstand der Modernisierungsopfer’, in Blatter für deutsche unå internationale Politik, 34:5 (1989), pp. 545–8.Google Scholar

21 See Minkenberg, op. cit., pp. 315–23.

22 Perrineau, Pascal, Le syndrome Le Pen, Paris, Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar

23 Mayer, Nonna and Perrineau, Pascal (eds), Le Front national à découvert, 2nd edn, Paris, 1996.Google Scholar

24 See Minkenberg, op. cit., pp. 330–9.

25 Stöss, Richard, Rechtsextremismus im vereinten Deutschland, Bonn, Friedrich EbertStiftung, 1999, p. 30.Google Scholar

26 See Minkenberg, Michael, ‘Im Osten was Neues: Die radikale Rechte im Wahljahr1998’, in Brunner, Gerd Pickel Wolf and Walz, Dieter (eds), Deutschland im Wahljahr1998, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 1999, pp. 313–33.Google Scholar

27 See Beyme, Klaus von, ‘Rechtsextremismus in Osteuropa’, in Falter, jürgen, Jaschke, Hans-Gerd and Winkler, jürgen (eds), Rechtsextremismus, PVS Special Issue, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1996, pp. 423–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 See Ramet, Sabrina (ed.), The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe since1989, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

29 Linz, Juan, ‘Transitions to Democracy’, in The Washington Quarterly, 13:3 (1990), p. 158.Google Scholar