Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:52:19.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Asylum and Sovereignty-Sharing in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Hakan G. Sicakkan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In focusing on the relationships between asylum recognition rates and the different institutional arrangements through which European states share or preserve their sovereignty, this article seeks to show how sovereignty-sharing affects the right to political asylum in practice. After a qualitative overview of variations in sovereignty-sharing forms, the article presents the results from a multiple regression analysis of the relationship between legal and institutional frames of asylum decision-making in 17 West European countries (EU-15, Norway and Switzerland) and the asylum recognition rates in these countries. The article ends with a brief assessment of the significance of the results for a potential policy change in the European Union.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , 2008 , pp. 206 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2008.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Neumayer, E., ‘Asylum Recognition Rates in Western Europe. Their Determinants, Variation, and Lack of Convergence’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49 (2005), pp. 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar These data have been made publicly available on the internet by the Journal of Conflict Resolution. Neumayer's data can be downloaded at http://www.yale.edu/unsy/jcr/jcrdata.htm.

2 H. G. Sicakkan ‘The European Politics of Citizenship and Asylum. A Comparative Analysis of the Relationship between Citizenship Models and the Legal-Institutional Frames of Asylum Determination in West Europe’, Bergen, University of Bergen, Department of Comparative Politics, 2006; H. G. Sicakkan, Political Asylum beyond Citizenship Concerns, New York, Edwin Mellen Press, forthcoming 2008.Google Scholar

3 F. Liebaut and T. B. Johnsen, Legal and Social Conditions for Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Western European Countries, Copenhagen, Danish Refugee Council, 2000.Google Scholar

4 K. Hailbronner, Study on the Asylum Single Procedure (‘One-Stop-Shop’) against the Background of the Common European Asylum System and the Goal of a Common Asylum Procedure. Report to the European Commission, Brussels, European Commission, 2002.Google Scholar

5 Neumayer, ‘Asylum Recognition Rates’, p. 51. The operationalization of the dependent variables has also determined the data structure. For each country, asylum recognition rates have been broken down with respect to the sending country. There are 207 sending countries in the data set, which means that we have 207 cases for each European country – that is, there should be 3,519 (17 × 207) cases. However, since not all countries send asylum seekers to all countries, the number of valid observations is 1,101.Google Scholar

6 Sicakkan, Political Asylum beyond Citizenship Concerns. The quantification is obtained from a factor analysis of actors’ roles in asylum decision-making in 19 European countries – with a point of departure in the categories ‘no role = 0’, ‘observer status = 1’, ‘advisory status = 2’, ‘equal status = 3’, and ‘full decision authority = 4’.Google Scholar

7 Hailbronner, Study on the Asylum Single Procedure. Google Scholar

8 Ibid.Google Scholar

9 Holzer, T., Scheneider, G. and Widmer, T., ‘Discriminating Decentralization: Federalism and the Handling of Asylum Applications in Switzerland (1988–1996)’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44 (2000), pp. 250–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Ibid.Google Scholar

11 Sicakkan, The European Politics of Citizenship and Asylum. Google Scholar

12 Cf. also M. Gibney, The Ethics and Politics of Asylum. Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Sicakkan, Political Asylum beyond Citizenship Concerns. Google Scholar

14 Holzer et al., ‘Discriminating Decentralization’.Google Scholar

15 Sicakkan, The European Politics of Citizenship and Asylum. Google Scholar