Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:09:02.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Conservatism and Old Socialism, The Neo‐Conservatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Nigel Ashford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , 01 July 1981 , pp. 353 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A. Etzioni, ‘The Neo‐Conservatives’, Partisan Review, 1977, p. 431; P. Green, The Nation, 1 May 1978; Ryan, W., ‘A Call to Action’, Social Policy, 3, 1972, p. 55.Google Scholar

2 ‘What is the Public Interest’, Public Interest, 1, 1966.

3 Glazer, ‘Being Deradicalized’, Commentary, October 1970; Moynihan, Coping, Vintage, 1975, p. 8; p. 15.

4 Aaron Wildavsky, ‘Government and the People’, Commentary, August 1973; Ginzburg, E. & Solow, R., ‘Special Issue on the Great Society’, Public Interest, 34, Winter 1974.Google Scholar

5 Glazer, ‘The New Left and Its Limits’, Commentary, July 1968.

6 Moynihan, ‘The Politics of Stability’, in Moynihan, 1975.

7 Horowitz, I. and Lipset, S., Dialogues on American Politics, Oxford University Press, 1978, p. 46;Google Scholar Kristol, ‘Is America Moving Right?’, Public Opinion, 1, September 1978.

8 Kristol, , On the Democratic Idea in America, Harper & Row, 1972, p. xix.Google Scholar

9 Kristol, 1972, p. 143. Evidence in Glazer, ‘The Limits of Social Policy’, Commentary, September 1971, and Moynihan, The Politics of Guaranteed Income, Vintage, 1973.

10 Moynihan, , Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding, Free Press, 1970;Google Scholar Lipset, , ‘The Wavering Polls’, Public Interest, 43, Spring 1976;Google Scholar Kristol, , Two Cheers for Capitalism, Basic Books, 1978, p. 234.Google Scholar

11 Moynihan, 1975, p. 189.

12 Moynihan, 1973, p. 149; Moynihan, , ‘Social Science and the Courts’, Public Interest, 54, Winter 1979, p. 20;Google Scholar Moynihan, 1970, p. xxix.

13 Wilson, & Rachael, P., ‘Can Government Regulate Itself?’, Public Interest, 46, Winter 1977, p. 4 Google Scholar; Wilson, , ‘The Middle Class Riddle’, Public Interest, 39, Spring 1975, p. 129.Google Scholar

14 Glazer, ‘The Limits of Social Policy’, Commentary, September 1971, pp. 51–58.

15 Wilson, , Thinking About Crime, Vintage, 1977, p. 39;Google Scholar Glazer, 1971. For a discussion on ‘the social issue’, see R. Scammon and B. Wattenberg, The Real Majority, Berkeley, 1972.

16 P. Weaver quoted in Moynihan, 1973, pp. 76–8.

17 Kristol, 1978, p. 27.

18 Moynihan, ‘The Case for a Family Allowance’, in Glazer, Cities in Trouble, Quadrangle, 1970.

19 Glazer, , Affirmative Discrimination, Basic Books, 1978, Ch. 6Google Scholar; Podhoretz, Breaking Ranks, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1979, p. 288. This theme is discussed in B. Bruce‐Riggs (ed.), The New Class?, Transaction Books, 1979.

20 Kristol, 1978, p. 159; Bell, The Coming of the Post‐Industrial Society, Basic Books, 1976, p. 489; Bell, , The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, Basic Books, 1978, p. 282;Google Scholar Moynihan, 1975, pp. 255–6.

21 Kristol, 1972, p. 133.

22 Wilson, 1977, p. xvii.

23 Kristol, 1972, p. 149; Wilson, 1977, p. 223.

24 S. Huntington, ‘The Democratic Distemper’ in Glazer & Kristol, 1976.

25 Bell, ‘The Revolution in Rising Entitlements’, Fortune, April 1975. See also Bell, 1978, pp. 232–6.

26 Bell, 1976, p. 482.

27 Kristol, ‘On Corporate Capitalism’, in Glazer & Kristol, 1976, p. 126.

28 Moynihan, 1975, p. 27.

29 Podhoretz, ‘The Urban Crisis’, Commentary, November 1970.

30 Kristol, 1978, p. 178; Bell, 1978.

31 Bell, 1976, p. 453; p. 454; p. 452.

32 Kristol, ‘When Virtue Loses All Her Loveliness’, in Kristol, 1978, p. 260.

33 Novak, The American Vision, American Enterprise Institute, 1978, p. 13; Bell, 1978, p. 26.

34 Kristol, 1978, p. x.

35 Ibid., p. xi. See the special symposium on ‘Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy’ in Commentary, April 1978, pp. 29–65.

36 Moynihan, 1973, p. 53.

37 Ibid., p. 55.

38 Kristol, 1978, p. 126; Bell, 1978, p. 276.

39 P. Berger & R. Neuhaus, To Empower People, American Enterprise Institute, 1977.

40 Ibid..

41 Peter Steinfels, The Neo‐Conservatives, Simon & Schuster, 1979, Ch. 10; S. Huntington, ‘The Democratic Distemper’, in Glazer & Kristol, 1976; Kristol, 1976, p. 66.

42 Steinfels, p. 272. See also Sheldon Wolin, New York Review of Books, 5 February 1976; H. Fairlie, ‘In Defence of Big Government’, New Republic, 13 March 1976; Fairlie, H., The Spoiled Child of the Western World, Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar

43 Nisbet in Glazer & Kristol, 1976, p. 168.

44 Kristol, 1978, p. 245.

45 Wilson, , Political Organisations, Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar

46 Podhoretz, , Making It, Random House, 1967, p. 316.Google Scholar

47 Moynihan, A Dangerous Place, Secker & Warburg, 1979 Google Scholar, and Commentary passim.