Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:08:44.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moderation without Change: The Strategic Transformation of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Matthew Whiting
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how violent separatist groups moderate. Using the case of Sinn Féin and the IRA in Northern Ireland, it shows that moderation is a multidimensional process, entailing a change in strategic behaviour but not necessarily in the goals or values of a separatist group. For Irish republicans, moderation entailed giving up violent revolution and embracing peaceful reformism, but it did not require changing long-term goals, accepting the legitimacy of British rule in Northern Ireland, or distancing themselves from their history of armed struggle. Moderation was possible because both Irish republicans and the British state distinguished between republicans’ strategic behaviour and their political goals, with the British state neither expecting nor demanding a change in the goals of republicanism, and republicans showing a willingness to change tactics to bring them closer to their long-term goal of a united Ireland. This finding has important implications for the moderation of other radical separatist groups.

Keywords

moderationradicalismpower-sharingNorthern Irelandseparatism
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 288 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Matthew Whiting is a Fellow in Government in the Department of Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Adams, G. (1998), ‘Keynote Statement on the Omagh Bombing and the State of the Peace Process, 1 September 1998’ (Belfast: Sinn Féin).Google Scholar
Alexander, G. (2002), The Sources of Democratic Consolidation (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bean, K. (2007), The New Politics of Sinn Féin (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).Google Scholar
Coakley, J. (2007), ‘National Identity in Northern Ireland: Stability or Change?’, Nations and Nationalism, 13(4): 573–597.Google Scholar
Cox, M., Guelke, A. and Stephen, F. (2006) (eds), A Farewell to Arms? Beyond the Good Friday Agreement, 2nd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
De Zeeuw, J. (2008) (ed.), From Soldiers to Politicians: Transforming Rebel Movements After Civil War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
English, R. (2004), Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (London: Pan).Google Scholar
Erk, J. and Anderson, L. (2010), ‘The Paradox of Federalism: Does Self-Rule Accommodate or Exacerbate Ethnic Divisions?’, Federal and Regional Studies, 19(2): 191–202.Google Scholar
Garry, J. (2009), ‘Consociation and its Critics: Evidence from the Historic Northern Ireland Assembly Election 2007’, Electoral Studies, 28(3): 458–466.Google Scholar
Garry, J.(2014), ‘Potentially Voting Across the Divide in Deeply Divided Places: Ethnic Catch-All Voting in Consociational Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 62(S1): 2–19.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007), ‘Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?’, Comparative Political Studies, 40(3): 231–253.Google Scholar
Hansard (1974), 'Hansard Parliamentary Procedures', HC Deb, vol. 871, col. 1476 (4 April 1974).Google Scholar
Hart, P. (2003), The IRA at War, 1916–1923 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. (2007), Crafting Peace: Power Sharing Institutions and the Negotiated Settlement of Civil Wars (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Hartzell, C., Hoddie, M. and Rothchild, D. (2001), ‘Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables’, International Organization, 55(1): 183–208.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. (2014), ‘Ethnic Power Sharing: Three Big Problems’, Journal of Democracy, 25(2): 5–20.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. (2005), Nations as Zones of Conflict (London: Sage).Google Scholar
IRA (1973), Freedom’s Struggle (Dublin: IRA).Google Scholar
IRA (2005), ‘Statement on the Ending of the Armed Campaign, 28 July 2005’ (Dublin: Irish Republican Publicity Bureau).Google Scholar
Kerr, M. (2011), The Destructors: The Story of Northern Ireland’s Lost Peace Process (Dublin: Irish Academic Press).Google Scholar
Lustick, I. (1993), Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Manning, C. (2004), ‘Armed Opposition Groups into Political Parties: Comparing Bosnia, Kosovo, and Mozambique’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(1): 54–76.Google Scholar
Mattest, M. and Savun, B. (2009), ‘Fostering Peace After Civil War: Commitment Problems and Agreement Design’, International Studies Quarterly, 53(3): 737–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, C., McGarry, J., O’Leary, B. and Schwartz, A. (2016), ‘Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability’, Government and Opposition, 51(1): 30–58.Google Scholar
McDonald, H. (2012), ‘Seven People Face Terrorism Charges in Northern Ireland’, The Guardian’, 19 May.Google Scholar
McEvoy, J. (2014), ‘The Role of External Actors in Incentivising Post-Conflict Power-Sharing’, Government and Opposition, 49(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (1995), Explaining Northern Ireland: Broken Images (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2008), ‘Consociation and its Critics: Northern Ireland after the Belfast Agreement’, in S. Choudhry (ed.), Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 369–408.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P., Evans, G. and O’Leary, B. (2009), ‘Extremist Outbidding in Ethnic Party Systems is Not Inevitable: Tribune Parties in Northern Ireland’, Political Studies, 57(2): 397–421.Google Scholar
Moore, G., Loizides, N., Sandal, N.A. and Lordos, A. (2014), ‘Winning Peace Frames: Intra-Ethnic Outbidding in Northern Ireland and Cyprus’, West European Politics, 37(1): 159–181.Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Office (1972), The Future of Northern Ireland: A Paper for Discussion (London: Stationery Office).Google Scholar
O’Boyle, G. (2011), ‘Bombings to Ballots: The Evolution of the Irish Republican Movement’s Conceptualisation of Democracy’, Irish Political Studies, 26(4): 593–606.Google Scholar
O’Leary, B. (1997), ‘The Conservative Stewardship of Northern Ireland, 1979–1997: Sound Bottomed Contradictions or Slow Learning?’, Political Studies, 45(4): 663–676.Google Scholar
O’Leary, B. (1998), ‘The Nature of the Agreement’, Fordham International Law Review, 22(4): 1628–1667.Google Scholar
O’Leary, B., Grofman, B. and Elklit, J. (2005), ‘Divisor Methods for Sequential Portfolio Allocation in Multi-Party Executive Bodies: Evidence from Northern Ireland and Denmark’, American Journal of Political Science, 49(1): 198–211.Google Scholar
Reilly, B. (2001), Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. (1999–2000), ‘A Constitutional Pied Piper: The Northern Irish Good Friday Agreement’, Political Science Quarterly, 114(4): 613–637.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2008), ‘Party Moderation and Politicians’ Ideological Rigidity’, Party Politics, 10(3): 325–342.Google Scholar
Schwedler, J. (2006), Faith in Moderation: Islamist Parties in Jordan and Yemen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Schwedler, J. (2011), ‘Can Islamists Become Moderates? Rethinking the Inclusion-Moderation Hypothesis’, World Politics, 63(2): 347–376.Google Scholar
Sinn, Féin (1974), Peace with Justice: Proposals for Peace in a New Federal Ireland (Dublin: Sinn Féin).Google Scholar
Sinn, Féin (1988), The Sinn Féin/SDLP Talks (Dublin: Sinn Féin).Google Scholar
Sinn, Féin (1996), Policing in Transition: A Legacy of Repression: An Opportunity for Justice (Dublin: Sinn Féin).Google Scholar
Snyder, J. (2000), From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Tezcür, G. (2010), The Paradox of Moderation: Muslim Reformers in Iran and Turkey (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
Unal, M. (2014), ‘Strategist or Pragmatist: A Challenging Look at Ocalan’s Retrospective Classification and Definition of PKK’s Strategic Periods between 1973 and 2012’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(3): 419–448.Google Scholar
Walter, B. (2002), Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, B. (2006), ‘Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others’, American Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 313–330.Google Scholar
Whitfield, T. (2014), Endgame for ETA: Elusive Peace in the Basque Country (London: Hurst).Google Scholar
Wickham, C. (2004), ‘The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party’, Comparative Politics, 36(2): 205–228.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. (2006), ‘Hamas Sweep Palestinian Elections, Complicating Peace Efforts in Mideast’, Washington Post, 27 January.Google Scholar