Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:56:48.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Decade of Christian Democratic Decline: The Dilemmas of the CDU, ÖVP and CDA in the 1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Fraser Duncan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores Christian Democratic electoral decline in the 1990s through an examination of the key problems faced by the CDU, the ÖVP and the CDA. Although the problems of Christian Democracy in this period are identified as arising from exogenous changes, the article goes beyond a mechanistic approach by also scrutinizing the response of the various parties. It is argued that the contraction of core support bases, intensified party competition and the rise of problematic issues created a series of dilemmas for the parties but also that the unconvincing reaction of the parties contributed to their electoral predicament.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , 2006 , pp. 469 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This article focuses exclusively on the CDU, but electoral statistics for the CDU/CSU (Christian Social Union) are used throughout.Google Scholar

2 See Freedland, Jonathan, ‘The Right is Left Bereft’, Guardian, 22 August 2001 Google Scholar; Katz, Richard S., ‘Crisis of the Right or Crisis of the Center?’, in Clay Clemens and Gerhard Hirscher (eds), Christian Democratic and Center-Right Parties in Europe and North America: Selected Perspectives, Munich, Hanns Seidel Stiftung, 2002, pp. 61–5Google Scholar; Chandler, William M., ‘Conservatism in Crisis?’, in Clemens and Hirscher, Christian Democratic and Center-Right Parties, pp. 7–23 Google Scholar.

3 Italian results post-1994 include only the proportional part of the election and are a combination of the PPI, Patto Segni, Democratici, RI and CDU. Dutch figures pre-1980 collect the results of the three confessional parties, the Catholic People's Party (KVP), Christian Historical Union (CHU) and Anti-Revolutionary Party (ARP).Google Scholar

4 Christopher Pierson, Hard Choices. Social Democracy in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001.Google Scholar

5 See Wolfgang Gibowski, ‘Social Change and the Electorate: An Analysis of the 1998 Bundestagswahl’, in Stephen Padgett and Thomas Saalfeld (eds), Bundestagswahl ’98: End of an Era?, London, Frank Cass, 1990, pp. 24–5; Norbert Lepszy and Christian Koecke, ‘Der niederländische Christlich-demokratische Appell (CDA)’, in Hans-Joachim Veen (ed.), Christlich-demokratische und konservative Parteien in Westeuropa, Paderborn, Ferdinand Schöningh, p. 184.Google Scholar

6 See the CDA's Nieuwe Wegen, Vaste Waarden, 1995, Section 2.Google Scholar

7 Fritz Plasser and Peter A. Ulram, ‘Parteien ohne Stammwähler? Zerfall der Parteibindungen und Neuausrichtung des österreichischen Wahlverhaltens’, in Anton Pelinka, Fritz Plasser and Wolfgang Meixner (eds), Die Zukunft der österreichischen Demokratie. Trends, Prognosen und Szenarien, Vienna, ZAP, 2000, p. 181.Google Scholar

8 Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk, Marlies Kamp and Jacques Thomassen, Nationaal kiezersonderzoek, 1998 verse steekproef – NKO’98, Amsterdam, Steinmetz Archive, p. 1415.Google Scholar

9 Gibowski, ‘Social Change and the Electorate’, p. 30.Google Scholar

10 Thomas R. Rochun, ‘Adaptation in the Dutch Party System: Social Change and Party Response’, in Beril A. Yeşilda (ed.), Comparative Political Parties and Party Elites, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1999, p. 103.Google Scholar

11 Aarts et al., Nationaal kiezersonderzoek.Google Scholar

12 Fritz Plasser, Peter A. Ulram and Franz Sommer, ‘Nationalratswahl 1999: Transformationen des österreichischen Wahlverhaltens’, in Andreas Khol, Günther Ofner, Günther Burkert-Dottolo and Stefan Karner (eds), Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Politik 1999, Vienna and Munich, Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 2000, p. 67.Google Scholar

13 Aarts et al., Nationaal kiezersonderzoek.Google Scholar

14 Russell J. Dalton, Ian McAllister and Martin P. Wattenberg, ‘The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment’, in Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds), Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 41–3.Google Scholar

15 See Herbert Kitshelt, The Transformation of European Social Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 34.Google Scholar

16 See Green-Pedersen, Christopher and Van Kersbergen, Kees, ‘The Politics of the “Third Way”. The Transformation of Social Democracy in Denmark and the Netherlands’, Party Politics, 8: 5 (2002), pp. 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Ron Hillebrand and Galen A. Irwin, ‘Changing Strategies: The Dilemma of the Dutch Labour Party’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds), Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 112–40.Google Scholar

18 Andreas Busch and Philip Manow, ‘The SPD and the Neue Mitte in Germany’, in Stuart White (ed.), New Labour: The Progressive Future?, Houndmills, Palgrave, 2001, pp. 175–89.Google Scholar

19 Green, Simon, ‘The 1998 German Bundestag Election: The End of an Era’, Parliamentary Affairs, 52: 2 (1999), pp. 349–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 See the ÖVP's Zukunftsmanifest, 1985.Google Scholar

21 Compare figures in Fritz Plasser and Peter A. Ulram, ‘Trends and Ruptures: Stability and Change in Austrian Voting Behaviour 1986–1996’, in Günter Bischof, Anton Pelinka and Ferdinand Karlhofer (eds), The Vranitzky Era in Austria, New Brunswick, NJ, and London, Transaction Publishers, 1999, p. 49; and Philip van Praag Jr. and Ellen Couvret, ‘De kiezers van GroenLinks en de SP’, Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 1997, Universiteitsdrukkerij Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, 1998, p. 187.Google Scholar

22 Philip van Praag Jr. and Selma Penseel, ‘Wat wil de kiezer? Politieke marketing in de verkiezingscampagne van 1998’, Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 1998, Universiteitsdrukkerij Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, 1999, p. 118.Google Scholar

23 See Christian Wagner, ‘Pizza-Connection. Die Geschichte einer verlorenen Zukunft der CDU’, in Tobias Dürr and Rüdiger Soldt (eds), Die CDU nach Kohl, Fischer, Frankfurt am Main, 1998, pp. 30–45.Google Scholar

24 Politbarometer, Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, Mannheim, 1992.Google Scholar

25 See Fessel-GfK figures quoted in Wolfgang C. Müller, ‘Elections and the Dynamics of the Austrian Party System since 1986’, 2000, available at http://www.polimatrix.at/download/dynamics.pdf.Google Scholar

26 See, for example, figures cited at http://www.bmbwk.gv.at/medienpool/3671/publ1_d.pdf accessed 25 July 2004.Google Scholar

27 See Hans Anker and Erik Oppenhuis, Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1994 Codebook, ICPSR version, Amsterdam, Dutch Electoral Research Foundation (SKON)/Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar

28 Ignazi, Piero, ‘The Silent Counter-Revolution. Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme-Right Parties in Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 22 (1992), pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Müller, ‘Elections and the Dynamics of the Austrian Party System’, p. 38.Google Scholar

30 Anker and Oppenhuis, Dutch Parliamentary Election Study.Google Scholar

31 Anton C. Hemerijck, ‘The Dutch Negotiating Economy: Learning Through Concertation’, in Frank Hendriks and Theo A. J. Toonen (eds), Polder Politics. The Re-Invention of Consensus Democracy in the Netherlands, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2001, p. 104.Google Scholar

32 See the CDU's Zukunftsprogramm, 1998, the ÖVP's Grundsaztprogramm, 1995, Article 6.6 and the CDA's Nieuwe Wege, Vaste Waarden, 1996, Section 4.Google Scholar

33 Security was included as an underlying principle of the party for the first time. See also ÖVP, Grundsatzprogramm, 1995, Article 4.6.Google Scholar

34 See CDU, Zukunftsprogramm, 1998, Article B22Google Scholar

35 See CDA, Nieuwe Wege, Vaste Waarden, 1996, Section 4.Google Scholar

36 Frank L. Wilson, ‘The Center-Right at the End of the Century’, in Frank L. Wilson (ed.), The European Center-Right at the End of the Twentieth Century, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1998, p. 260.Google Scholar

37 See Ronald J. Irving, The Christian Democratic Parties of Western Europe, London, Allen and Unwin, 1979; Kees van Kersbergen ‘The Distinctiveness of Christian Democracy’, in David Hanley (ed.), Christian Democracy in Europe. A Comparative Perspective, London and New York, Pinter, 1994, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar

38 Kees van Kersbergen, Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London and New York, Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

39 See Sven Jochem, ‘Sozialpolitik in der Ära Kohl: Die Politik des Sozialversicherungsstaates’, University of Bremen ZeS-Arbeitspapier Nr.12/99, 1999.Google Scholar

40 Data from Comparative Manifestos Project CD-ROM available with Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara and Eric Tanenbaum, Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments, 1945–98, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

41 Bösch, Frank, ‘Kontinuität im Umbruch: Die CDU/CSU auf dem Weg ins neue Jahrhundert’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 5, 2000, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar

42 Chandler, ‘Conservatism in Crisis?’, p. 15.Google Scholar

43 Interview with Heiner Geißler in Die Neue Gesellschaft, April, 2000.Google Scholar

44 Müller, Wolfgang C. and Steininger, Barbara, ‘Party Organisation and Party Competitiveness: The Case of the Austrian People's Party, 1945–1992’, European Journal of Political Research, 26: 1 (1994), pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Profil, 3, 18 January 1999.Google Scholar

46 More about the group's aims can be found at http://www.plattform.or.at/index2.html accessed 20 May 2003.Google Scholar

47 See Peter Lösche, ‘Kanzlerwahlverein? Zur Organisationskultur der CDU’, in T. Dürr and R. Soldt (eds), Die CDU nach Kohl, Frankfurt am Main, Fischer, 1988, p. 77.Google Scholar

48 Fogarty, Michael How Dutch Christian Democracy Made a New Start’, Political Quarterly, 3 (1995), p. 154.Google Scholar

49 Wolfgang C. Müller, Fritz Plasser and Peter A. Ulram, ‘Party Responses to the Erosion of Voter Loyalties in Austria: Weakness as an Advantage and Strength as a Handicap’, in Peter Mair, Wolfgang C. Müller and Fritz Plasser, Political Parties and Electoral Change. Party Responses to Electoral Markets, London, Sage, 2004, p. 167.Google Scholar

50 Joop Hippe, Paul Lucardie and Gerrit Voerman, ‘Kroniek 1995. Overzicht van de partijpolitieke gebeurtnissen van het jaar 1995’, Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 1995, Universiteitsdrukkerij Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, 1996, p. 39.Google Scholar

51 See Marcel Metze, De stranding. Het CDA van hoogtepunt naar catastrofe, Nijmegen, SUN, 1995.Google Scholar

52 Figures from 1998 Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, ICPSR version, Amsterdam, NIWI-Steinmetz Archive/Dutch Electoral Research Foundation.Google Scholar

53 See Alistair Cole, ‘Political Leadership in Western Europe: Helmut Kohl in Comparative Context’, in Clay Clemens and William E. Paterson (eds), The Kohl Chancellorship, London and Portland, Frank Cass, 1998, pp. 123–6.Google Scholar

54 See Carsten Zelle, ‘Candidates, Issues and Party Choice in the Federal Election of 1994’, in Geoffrey K. Roberts (ed.), Superwahljahr: The German Elections in 1994, London, Frank Cass, 1996, p. 71.Google Scholar