No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
At this moment in our history, most Americans have concluded that government is not performing well. It promises much, but it does not deliver what it promises. The great danger, in my judgement, is that this momentary disillusionment with government will turn into a more profound and lasting loss of faith.
1 For the mature, if slightly jaundiced, reflections of an ex‐bureaucrat, see Seidman, Harold: Politics, Position and Power, New York, 1970, Chapters 3, 6 and 9 Google Scholar.
2 See Neustadt, Richard E.: ‘Presidency and Legislation: the Growth of Central Clearance’, in American Political Science Review, 18 09 1954, pp. 641–71 Google Scholar.
3 Gilmour, Robert S.: ‘Central Legislative Clearance, a Revised Perspective’, in Public Administration Review, XXI, 1971, pp. 150–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 US Congress: Joint Economic Committee: The Planning‐Programming Budgeting System: Progress and Potentials. Hearings before Sub‐Committee on Economy in Government. 90 Congress, 1st session, September 1967. U.S. Senate Committee on Government Operations: Planning‐Programming‐Budgeting, Interim Observations, study submitted by the Sub‐Committee on National Security and International Operations, 90 Congress, 2nd session, 1968. For an outside assessment of the new system's impact after three years see Rourke, Francis E.: Bureaucracy, Politics and Public Policy, New York, 1969 Google Scholar.
5 See, e.g., Output Budgeting, a feasibility study undertaken by the Department of Education and Science, HMSO, London, 1969.
6 By Tugwell, Rexford G., in Perloff , Harvey S.(ed.): The Future of United States Government: towards the year 2000, New York, 1972, p. 320 Google Scholar.