Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:03:47.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Club Government‐the Crisis of the Labour Party in the National Perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Extract

WHATEVER MAY BE IN DOUBT ABOUT THE CURRENT CRISIS IN the Labour Party, one thing is clear. In a sense true of no other internal crisis in the 62 years since the loose and inchoate ‘Labour Alliance’ of 1900 first became a true political party, with individual members and a distinctive claim to power, the arguments which have provoked it concern the rules of the game as well as moves within the game: the way in which party decisions are made and enforced, as well as the content of the decisions themselves. This, of course, is why the arguments are so fierce and the crisis so deep. Policy defeats can be revised later if Fortune's wheel turns again. Constitutional defeats damage the losers permanently. It is true, no doubt, that both sides in the current struggle have exaggerated the likely consequences of the changes forced through at the October party conference. The old French saying that there is more in common between two deputies, one of whom is a Communist, than between two Communists, one of whom is a deputy has not suddenly lost all relevance to Westminster merely because Labour MPs will have to face compulsory reselection between general elections, or because the party leader is elected in an electoral college. Reselection will not re-make the Parliamentary Labour Party in the image of constituency management committees, and the creation of an electoral college will not free the leader from the need to win and hold the confidence of his parliamentary colleagues. When all the necessary qualifications have been made, however, there can be no doubt that the constitutional changes will shift the balance of party power to the advantage of the Left and to the detriment of the Right — as, of course, they were intended to do. That is what the struggle has been about; and the media have been right to concentrate their attention on that aspect of it.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Part of this article is based on an Inaugural Lecture delivered by the author at the University of Salford, 25 October 1979.

References

Footnotes

2 Sir Jennings, Ivor, The Law and the Constitution (Fourth Edition), London University Press, 1955, p. 8.Google Scholar

3 Chapman, Leslie, Your Disobedient Servant, Chatto & Windus, 1978.Google Scholar Crossman, R. H. S., Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, Hamilton–Cape, 197577.Google Scholar Nicholson, Max, The System, Hodder & Stoughton, 1967.Google ScholarPubMed Johnson, Nevil, In Search of the Constitution, Pergamon Press, 1977.Google Scholar Finer, S. E. (ed.), Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform, Anthony Wigram, 1975.Google Scholar

The Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Electoral Reform, June 1976, chaired by Lord Blake.

Hailsham, Lord, The Dilemma of Democracy, Collins, 1978.Google Scholar

Sir Scarman, Leslie, English Law: the New Dimension (The Hamlyn Lecture 1974), Stevens & Sons, 1975.Google Scholar

4 See Leonard, Dick, ‘Paying for Party Politics’, Political and Economic Planning, 1975;Google Scholar Lipsey, David, ‘The Reforms People Want’, New Society, 4 10 1979 .Google Scholar

5 Beer, S. H., Modern British Politics, London, 1975, pp. 126–52.Google Scholar

6 Notably in the final section of The Future of Socialism; in his later writings, it is important to note, Crosland was much more pessimistic.

7 Olson, Mancur, ‘The Political Economy of Comparative Growth Rates’, mimeograph, 1979.Google Scholar

8 A phrase for which I am indebted to Mr Richard Holme.

9 Dicey, A. V., An Introduction to the Study of the Constitution (Tenth Edition), 1979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted in Lester, Anthony, ‘Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: the Law and the British Constitution’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 125, No. 2, p. 338.Google Scholar

10 See Anthony Lester, op. cit., for a brilliant discussion of this.