No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
1 On this see Mellors, Colin, The British MP, London, Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
2 The distinction is made by Rose, Richard in his article ‘Parties, Factions and Tendencies’, Political Studies, Vol. XII, 1964, pp. 3–46.Google Scholar
3 Norton, Philip, Dissension in the House of Commons 1945–74, London, Macmillan, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Gilmour, Ian, The Body Politic, London, Hutchinson, 1971, p. 261.Google Scholar Quoted by Norton at p. 164.
5 On this see Norton, P. ‘Intra‐Party Dissent in the House of Commons: A Case Study. The Immigration Rules 1972’, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol XXIX, 1976.Google Scholar
6 On this see the recent study by Russel, T., The Tory Party: Its Policies, Divisions and Future, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1978 Google Scholar, which, though exaggerated in places underlines the plight of the Tory Left.
7 The orthodoxy here comes from Finer, S. E., Berrington, Hugh & Bartholomew, D. J., Buckbench Opinion in the House of Commons, Oxford, Pergamon, 1961.Google Scholar
8 On this see Gamble, Andrew, The Conservative Nation, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
9 Griffith, J. G., Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills, London, PEP, 1974.Google Scholar