Article contents
Between Two Worlds: Europe in a Globalizing Era1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
Extract
Globalization – Simply The Growing Intensity, Extent And deepening impact of worldwide interconnectedness – poses anew the classic questions of political life, namely: who rules, by what means, in whose interests and to what purpose? This is not to suggest, as some do, that the forces of globalization are eclipsing sovereign states but it is to acknowledge that the necessary conditions for sovereign and democratic self-government are undergoing a significant transformation. This is especially evident in Europe where, at the great intersection of regionalism and globalism, a novel continental political order is crystallizing: not quite federalism in its orthodox form but clearly something more than classic intergovermentalism. Caught between two worlds – a Europe of nation-states and a Europe of Citizens to use Joschka Fischer's construction – the future political trajectory of the continent, in part, will depend upon how effectively regionalism mediates the dynamics of globalism and localism.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2002
Footnotes
This article was originally delivered as the Annual Lecture for the Centre for European Studies, Portsmouth University, October 2001. It has benefited from the advice and comments of the journal’s Editor and an anonymous reviewer.
References
2 President Valery Giscard d’Estaing, Introductory Speech to the Convention on the Future of Europe, European Council, 26 February 2002, p. 8.
3 Wallace, H., ‘Globalization and Europeanization: Complementary or Contradictory Trends?’, New Political Economy, 5:3 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Quoted in McKay, D., Designing Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Davies, N., Europe - A History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, p. xv.Google Scholar
6 Said, E., Orientalism, London, Allen Lane, 1979.Google Scholar
7 Laïdi, Z., A World without Meaning, London, Routledge, 1998, p. 82.Google Scholar
8 Skiair, L., The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford, Blackwells, 2001, p. 335.Google Scholar
9 McNamara, K. quoted in B. Rosamond, ‘Discourses of Globalization and European Identities’, in Christainsen, T., Jorgensen, K. and Wiener, A. (eds), The Social Construction of Europe, London, Sage, 2001, pp. 158–76Google Scholar.
10 B. Rosamond, ibid.
11 UNDP, Human Development Report 1997, Oxford, Oxford University Press, UNDP, 1997.
12 Economist. Survey, Globalization and its Critics, June 2001.
13 Wallace, H., ‘Politics and Policy in the EU’, Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds), Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 16.Google Scholar
14 Z. Laïdi, op. cit, p. 83.
15 Scharpf, F., Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Ibid., p. 28.
17 See Gill, S., ‘Constitutionalizing Capital: EMU and Disciplinary Neo-Liberalism’, in Bieler, A. and Morton, A. (eds), Social Forces in the Making of the The New Europe, London, Palgrave, 2001, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
18 Esping-Andersen, G., Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Ferge, Z., ‘Welfare and “Ill-Fare” Systems in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Sykes, R., Palier, B. and Prior, P. (eds), Globalization and European Welfare States, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2001, p. 152.Google Scholar
20 Hay, C., ‘Globalization, Economic Change and the Welfare State’, Sykes, R., Palier, B. and Prior, P. (eds), Globalization and European Welfare States, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2001, p. 57 Google Scholar.
21 Ibid.
22 Keohane, R., ‘Hobbes’ Dilemma and Institutional Change in World Politics: Sovereignty in International Society’, in Holm, H. H. and Sorensen, G. (eds), Whose World Order”?, Boulder, Colo., Westview Press, 1995, pp. 165–86.Google Scholar
23 Held, D. and McGrew, A. et al., Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999, p. 515.Google Scholar
24 Ibid.
25 Siedentop, L., Democracy in Europe, London, Allen Lane, 2000, pp. 28–9.Google Scholar
26 See, in particular: Cable, V., Globalization and Global Governance, London, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1999;Google Scholar Cerny, P., ‘Globalization, Governance and Complexity’, in Prakash, A. and Hart, J. A. (eds), Globalization and Governance, London, Routledge, 1999, pp. 184–208;Google Scholar and Rosenau, J., ‘Governance, Order and Change in World Politics’, in Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E.-O. (eds), Governance without Government, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 See Pierre, J. and Peters, B. G., The New Governance: States, Markets, and Networks, London, Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
28 Connolly, W. E., ‘Democracy and Territoriality’, Millennium, 20:3 (1991), pp. 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Walker, R. B. J., ‘On the Spatio-temporal Conditions of Democratic Practice’, Alternatives, 16:2 (1991), pp. 243–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Sandel, M., Democracy’s Discontent, Harvard University Press, 1996, p. 339.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., p. 202.
32 L. Siedentop, op. cit., p. 34.
33 Thompson, D., ‘Democratie Theory and Global Society’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7:2 (1999), pp. 111–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 See Hutchings, K., International Political Theory, London, Sage, 1999, p. 208.Google Scholar
35 Walker, R. B. J., One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace, Boulder, Colo., Lynne Reinner, 1988, p. 134.Google Scholar
36 Elazar, D. J., Constitutionalizing Globalization, New York, Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar
37 See: Gill, S., ‘Globalization, Market Civilization, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, Millennium, 24:3 (1995), pp. 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 L. Siedentop, op. cit.; Calleo, D. P., Rethinking Europe’s Future, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 380;Google Scholar Habermas, J., ‘A Constitution for Europe?’, New Left Review, 11 09/10., 2001, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
39 L. Siedentop, op. cit., p. 1.
40 D. P. Calleo, op. cit., p. 249.
41 J. Habermas, op. cit.
42 Shaw, J., ‘Postnational Constitutionalism in the European Union’, in Christiansen, T., Jorgensen, K. and Weiner, H. (eds), The Social Construction of Europe, London, Sage, 2001, pp. 66–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Fossum, J. E., ‘Constitution making in the European Union’, in Eriksen, E. and Fossum, J. (eds), Democracy in the European Union, London, Routledge, 2000, p. 99.Google Scholar
44 Ibid.
45 Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Ibid.; see also Eriksen, E. and Fossum, J. (eds), Democracy in the European Union, London, Routledge, 2000, pp. 365.Google Scholar
47 Quoted in J. Shaw, op. cit., p. 77.
48 Ibid p. 82.
49 Ibid.
50 V. Giscard d’Estaing, op. cit.
51 Lionel Jospin qouted in J. Habermas, op. cit. See also Jospin, Lionel, My Vision of Europe and Globalization, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002, pp. 149.Google Scholar
52 J. Habermas, op. cit.
53 Calleo, D. P., Rethinking Europe’s Future, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2001, p. 10.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by