Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:39:20.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehending global governance: International regime complexity vs. global constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2020

KAREN J. ALTER Open the ORCID record for KAREN J. ALTER [Opens in a new window]
KAREN J. ALTER*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Scott Hall, 601 University Place, Evanston, IL60208, USA.
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The After Fragmentation special issue unites political science conversations about regime complexity with legal/normative conversations about global constitutionalism through a focus on the generation and resolution of interface conflicts, defined as moments when overlapping elements or rule incompatibilities generate actual conflicts. Yet scholars choosing among these two perspectives actually have different objectives. After reviewing the two literatures, I argue that this special issue is closer to the global constitutionalism perspective, which generally seeks legitimated order. By contrast, the regime complexity literature asks how does the fact that global governance is spread across multiple institutions in itself shape cooperation politics. Investigating what it means to get ‘beyond fragmentation’, I suggest that the potential or actuality of rule conflicts is not necessarily a problem because conflicts are a normal and even salutary aspect of politics. If conflict is not the concern, then what should we be worrying about? Both perspectives, I argue, are amoral because they normalise and help justify an international order where responsibility is spread across institutions, promoting order while failing to address fundamental problems affecting people and the world. In this respect, resolving rule conflicts does not get us beyond fragmentation.

Keywords

fragmentationglobal constitutionalismglobal governanceinternational lawregime complexity
Type
Special Issue: After Fragmentation
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 413 - 423
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Karen J. Alter is the Lady Board of Managers of the Colombian Exposition Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University, and a permanent visiting professor at iCourts, the Danish National Research Foundation’s Centre of Excellence for International Courts. Thanks to Jeffrey Dunoff, Kal Raustiala, Oliver Westwinter, Mette Eilstrup and Christian Kreuder-Sonner for their helpful feedback on this article.

References

Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2018. “National Perspectives on International Constitutional Review: Diverging Optics.’’ In Comparative Judicial Review, edited by Delaney, Erin and Dixon, Rosalind, 244–71. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2017. International Court Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.’’ Perspective on Politics 7(1):13–24.10.1017/S1537592709090033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Raustiala, Kal. 2018. “The Rise of International Regime Complexity.’’ The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14:(2018) 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignami, Francesca. 2005. “Creating European Rights: National Values and Supranational Interests.’’ Columbia Journal of European Law 11:241–352.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O. and Sabel, Charles. 2013. “New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance.’’ New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45(3):723–86.Google Scholar
Búrca, De, Gráinne, Robert O. Keohane and Sabel, Charles. 2014. “Global Experimentalist Governance.’’ British Journal of Political Science 44(3):477–86. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000076>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey. 2017. “The Multifacited Relationship between Functionalism and Global Constitutionalism.” In Handbook on Global Constitutionalism, edited by Lang, Anthony F. and Wiener, Antje, 183–94. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781783477357.00022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flonk, Daniëlle, Jachtenfuchs, Markus and Obendiek, Anke. 2020. “Authority Conflicts in Internet Governance: Liberals vs. Sovereigntists?” Global Constitutionalism 9(2):364–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luise Wiuff, Moe and Anna, Geis. 2020. “From Liberal Interventionism to Stabilisation: A New Consensus on Norm-Downsizing in Interventions in Africa.’’ Global Constitutionalism 9(2):387–412.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. 2017. “Constructing an International Community.’’ American Journal of International Law 111(2):317–56. <https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.22>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Thomas, Held, David and Young, Kevin. 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.’’ Perspectives on Politics 9(1):7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian and Zürn, Michael. 2020. “After Fragmentation. Norm Collisions, Interface Conflicts, and Conflict Management.” Global Constitutionalism 9(2):241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Anthony F, and Wiener, Antje. 2017. Handbook on Global Constitutionalism, Research Handbooks on Globalisation and the Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Tyler. 2018. “Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes.’’ International Organization 72 (3):561–90 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000164>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.’’ International Organization 58(2):277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Eric. 1981. “Lawyers, Judges and the Making of a Transnational Constitution.’’ American Journal of International Law 75(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar