Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:28:50.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specht modules for finite reflection groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

S. HalicioǦlu
S. HalicioǦlu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ankara University, 06100 Tandoǧan, Ankara Turkey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over fields of characteristic zero, there are well known constructions of the irreducible representations, due to A. Young, and of irreducible modules, called Specht modules, due to W. Specht, for the symmetric groups Sn which are based on elegant combinatorial concepts connected with Young tableaux etc. (see, e.g. [13]). James [12] extended these ideas to construct irreducible representations and modules over an arbitrary field. Al-Aamily, Morris and Peel [1] showed how this construction could be extended to cover the Weyl groups of type Bn. In [14] Morris described a possible extension of James' work for Weyl groups in general. Later, the present author and Morris [8] gave an alternative generalisation of James' work which is an extended improvement and extension of the original approach suggested by Morris. We now give a possible extension of James' work for finite reflection groups in general.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 279 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1995

References

REFERENCES

1.Al-Aamily, E., Morris, A. O. and Peel, M. H., The representations of the Weyl groups of type Bn,, J. Algebra 68 (1981), 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Borel, A. and de Siebenthal, J, Les sous-groupes fermès connexes de rang maximium des groupes de Lie clos, Comm. Math. Helv. 23 (1949), 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bourbaki, N., Croupes et algèbres de Lie, Chapters 4, 5, 6, Actualites Sci. Indust. 1337, (Hermann, Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
4.Carter, R. W., Conjugacy classes in the Weyl group, Compositio Math. 25 (1972), 1–59.Google Scholar
5.Carter, R. W., Simple groups of Lie type, (Wiley, London, New York, Sydney, Toronto, 1989).Google Scholar
6.Dynkin, E. B., Semisimple subalgebras of semisimple Lie algebras, Amer. Math. Soc. Translations(2) 6 (1957), 111–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Grove, L. C. and Benson, C. T., Finite reflection groups, (Springer Verlag, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.HalicioǦlu, S. and Morris, A. O., Specht modules for Weyl groups, Beiträge Algebra Geom. 34 (1993), 257–276.Google Scholar
9.HahcioǦlu, S., A basis of Specht modules for Weyl groups, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
10.Humphreys, J. E., Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory, (Springer-Verlag, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Humphreys, J. E., Reflection groups and Coxeter groups, (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.James, G. D., The irreducible representations of the symmetric group, Bull. London Math. Soc. 8 (1976), 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.James, G. D. and Kerber, A., The representation theory of the symmetric group, (Addison-Wesley, 1981).Google Scholar
14.Morris, A. O., Representations of Weyl groups over an arbitrary field, Asterisque 87–88 (1981), 267–287.Google Scholar
15.Morris, A. O. and Idowu, A. J., Some combinatorial results for Weyl groups, Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 101 (1987), 405–420.Google Scholar