Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:57:56.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primitive skew Laurent polynomial rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

D. A. Jordan
D. A. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [8] the author studied the question of the primitivity of an Ore extension R[x, δ], where δ is a derivation of the ring R. If a is an automorphism of R then it can be shown that R[x, α] is primitive if the following conditions are satisfied: (i) no power αsS ≥ 1, of α is inner; (ii) the only ideals of R invariant under α are 0 and R. These conditions are also known to be necessary and sufficient for the skew Laurent polynomial ring R[x, x−1, α] to be simple [9]. The object of this paper is to find conditions which are sufficient for R[x, x−1, α] to be primitive. The results obtained are remarkably similar to those of [8]. Two logically independent conditions are each found to be sufficient for the primitivity of R[x, x−1, α]. Of these, one is also shown to be sufficient for R[x, α] to be primitive. Included in the examples illustrating these results are some applications to the theory of primitive group rings. The basic techniques involved are also applied to produce a counterexample to the converse of a theorem of Goldie and Michler [3] on when R[x, x−1, α] is a Jacobson ring.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1978

References

REFERENCES

1.Bourbaki, N., Commutative algebra (Hermann/Addison-Wesley, 1972).Google Scholar
2.Cozzens, J. and Faith, C., Simple noetherian rings (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Goldie, A. W. and Michler, G., Ore extensions and polycyclic group rings, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 9 (1974), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M., An introduction to the theory of numbers (4th edition) (Oxford Univ. Press, 1960).Google Scholar
5.Jacobson, N., Structure of rings (rev. edition) (Amer. Math. Soc. Colloquium Publications, 1964).Google Scholar
6.Jordan, C. R. and Jordan, D. A., A note on the semiprimitivity of Ore extensions, Comm. Algebra 4 (1976), 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jordan, D. A., Noetherian Ore extensions and Jacobson rings, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 10 (1975), 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Jordan, D. A., Primitive Ore extensions, Glasgow Math. J. 18 (1977), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Jordan, D. A., Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Leeds (1975).Google Scholar
10.Passman, D. S., Primitive group rings, Pacific J. Math. 47 (1973), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar