Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:05:27.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON SELF-INTERSECTION INVARIANTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

MARK GRANT
MARK GRANT*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We prove that the Hatcher–Quinn and Wall invariants of a self-transverse immersion f: Nn ↬ M2n coincide. That is, we construct an isomorphism between their target groups, which carries one onto the other. We also employ methods of normal bordism theory to investigate the Hatcher–Quinn invariant of an immersion f: Nn ↬ M2n−1.

Keywords

Primary 57R4257R40Secondary 57R1957R67
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 259 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2012

References

REFERENCES

1.Dax, J. P., Étude homotopique des espaces de plongements, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Super. 5 (4) (1972), 303–377.Google Scholar
2.Ekholm, T., Regular homotopy and Vassiliev invariants of generic immersions Sk → R 2k−1, k ≥ 4, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 7 (8) (1998), 1041–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Haefliger, A., Plongements différentiables dans le domaine stable, Comment. Math. Helv. 37 (1962), 155–176.Google Scholar
4.Hatcher, A. and Quinn, F., Bordism invariants of intersections of submanifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 200 (1974), 327–344.Google Scholar
5.Juhász, A., A geometric classification of immersions of 3-manifolds into 5-space, Manuscr. Math. 117 (1) (2005), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Klein, J. R. and Williams, E. B., Homotopical intersection theory, I, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 939–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Klein, J. R. and Williams, E. B., Homotopical intersection theory, II: Equivariance, Math. Z. 264 (4) (2010), 849–880.Google Scholar
8.Koschorke, U., Vector fields and other vector bundle morphisms—A singularity approach, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 847 (Springer, Berlin, 1981).Google Scholar
9.Munson, B. A., A manifold calculus approach to link maps and the linking number, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 8 (4) (2008), 2323–2353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Saeki, O., Szűcs, A. and Takase, M., Regular homotopy classes of immersions of 3-manifolds into 5-space, Manuscr. Math. 108 (1) (2002), 13–32.Google Scholar
11.Salikhov, K., Multiple points of immersions, preprint, arXiv:math/0203118Google Scholar
12.Salomonsen, H. A., Bordism and geometric dimension, Math. Scand. 32 (1973), 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shapiro, A., Obstructions to the imbedding of a complex in a euclidean space. I. The first obstruction, Ann. Math. 66 (2) (1957), 256–269.Google Scholar
14.Szűcs, A., Note on double points of immersions, Manuscr. Math. 76 (3–4) (1992), 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wall, C. T. C., Surgery of non-simply-connected manifolds, Ann. Math. 84 (2) (1966), 217–276.Google Scholar
16.Wall, C. T. C., Surgery on compact manifolds (Ranicki, A. A., Editor), Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 69 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999).Google Scholar
17.Whitney, H., The self-intersections of a smooth n-manifold in 2n-space, Ann. Math. 45 (2) (1944), 220–246.Google Scholar