Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:28:20.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON ROOT SUBSYSTEMS AND INVOLUTIONS IN Sn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2010

D. DERIZIOTIS ,
T. P. MCDONOUGH  and
C. A. PALLIKAROS
D. DERIZIOTIS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, GR-15784, Athens, Greece e-mail: [email protected]
T. P. MCDONOUGH
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics and Physics, University of Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]
C. A. PALLIKAROS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Given an involution z in W, where W is the symmetric group of degree n, we study the relation between the subsystems of a root system for W corresponding to certain decreasing subsequences of z and the two-sided Kazhdan–Lusztig cell of W containing z.

Keywords

Primary: 20F55Secondary: 20B3020C3020C3005E10
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 357 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2010

References

REFERENCES

1.Carter, R. W., Simple Groups of Lie Type (Wiley, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
2.Dipper, R. and James, G. D., Representations of Hecke algebras of general linear groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. 52 (3) (1986), 20–52.Google Scholar
3.Dynkin, E. B., Semisimple subalgebras of semisimple Lie algebras, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 6 (2) (1957), 111–244.Google Scholar
4.Fulton, W., Young Tableaux (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar
5.The GAP Group, GAP–Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.4.9 (2006), available at http://www.gap-system.org.Google Scholar
6.Geck, M., Kazhdan–Lusztig cells and the Murphy basis, Proc. London Math. Soc. 93 (3) (2006), 635–665.Google Scholar
7.Geck, M. and Pfeiffer, G., Characters of Finite Coxeter Groups and Iwahori-Hecke Algebras (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar
8.Greene, C., An extension of Schensted's theorem, Advances in Math. 14 (1974), 254–265.Google Scholar
9.James, G. and Kerber, A., The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Group, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 16 Section: Algebra (Cohn, P. M. and Lyndon, R., Editors) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
10.James, G. D. and Peel, M. H., Specht series for skew representations of symmetric groups J. Algebra 56 (1979), 343–364.Google Scholar
11.Kazhdan, D. A. and Lusztig, G., Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras, Invent. Math. 53 (1979), 165–184.Google Scholar
12.McDonough, T. P. and Pallikaros, C. A., Some investigations concerning Kazhdan–Lusztig cells in finite Coxeter groups of type A n, Bull. Greek Math. Soc. 48 (2003), 51–59.Google Scholar
13.McDonough, T. P. and Pallikaros, C. A., On subsequences and certain elements which determine various cells in S n, J. Algebra 319 (2008), 1249–1263.Google Scholar
14.Richardson, R. W., Conjugacy classes of involutions in Coxeter groups, Bull Aust. Math. Soc. 26 (1982), 1–15.Google Scholar
15.Sagan, B., The Symmetric Group, Representations, Combinatorial Algorithms and Symmetric Functions, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 203 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
16.Schützenberger, M. P., La correspondance de Robinson, Combinatoire et Representation du Groupe Symmetrique, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 579 (Foata, D., Editor) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977) 59–113.Google Scholar