Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:36:48.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GROUP BIALGEBRAS AND PERMUTATION BIALGEBRAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

MARTIN CROSSLEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Malvenuto and Reutenauer (C. Malvenuto and C. Reutenauer, Duality between quasi-symmetric functions and the Solomon descent algebra, J. Algebra177 (1995), 967–982) showed how the total symmetric group ring ⊕nZΣn could be made into a Hopf algebra with a very nice structure which admitted the Solomon descent algebra as a sub-Hopf algebra. To do this they replaced the group multiplication by a convolution product, thus distancing their structure from the group structure of Σn. In this paper we examine what is possible if we keep to the group multiplication, and we also consider the question for more general families of groups. We show that a Hopf algebra structure is not possible, but cocommutative and non-cocommutative counital bialgebras can be obtained, arising from certain diagrams of group homomorphisms. In the case of the symmetric groups we note that all such structures are weak in the sense that the dual algebras have many zero-divisors, but structures which respect descent sums can be found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2013 

References

REFERENCES

1.Aguiar, M., Ferrer, W. and Moreira, W., The smash product of symmetric functions. Extended abstract. Preprint (2004). Available at http://arxiv.org/pdf/math.CO/0412016.pdf. Accessed on August 23rd, 2010.Google Scholar
2.Malvenuto, C. and Reutenauer, C., Duality between quasi-symmetric functions and the Solomon descent algebra, J. Algebra 177 (1995), 967982.Google Scholar
3.Nichols, W. and Sweedler, M., Hopf algebras and combinatorics, Contemp. Math. 6 (1982), 4984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Solomon, L., A Mackey formula in the group ring of a Coxeter group, J. Algebra 41 (1976), 255268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar