Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:45:33.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GK DIMENSION AND LOCALLY NILPOTENT SKEW DERIVATIONS

Part of: Chain conditions, growth conditions, and other forms of finiteness Rings and algebras with additional structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

JEFFREY BERGEN  and
PIOTR GRZESZCZUK
JEFFREY BERGEN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics DePaul University 2320 N. Kenmore Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA e-mail: [email protected]
PIOTR GRZESZCZUK
Affiliation:
Faculty of Computer Science, Białystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Białystok, Poland e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let A be a domain over an algebraically closed field with Gelfand–Kirillov dimension in the interval [2,3). We prove that if A has two locally nilpotent skew derivations satisfying some natural conditions, then A must be one of five algebras. All five algebras are Noetherian, finitely generated, and have Gelfand–Kirillov dimension equal to 2. We also obtain some results comparing the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of an algebra to its subring of invariants under a locally nilpotent skew derivation.

MSC classification

Primary: 16P90: Growth rate, Gelfand-Kirillov dimension
Secondary: 16W25: Derivations, actions of Lie algebras
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 555 - 567
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2014 

References

REFERENCES

1.Bavula, V. V., Generators and defining relations for rings of invariants of commuting locally nilpotent derivations or automorphims, J. London Math. Soc. 76 (1) (2007), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bell, J. P. and Smoktunowicz, A., Rings of differential operators on curves, Isr. J. Math. 192 (1) (2012), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bergen, J. and Grzeszczuk, P., On rings with locally nilpotent skew derivations, Commun. Algebra, 39 (2011), 3698–3708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Borho, W. and Kraft, H., Über die Gelfand–Kirillov dimension Math. Ann. 220 (1976), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chung, L. O. and Luh, J., Nilpotency of derivations on an ideal, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 90 (2) (1984), 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Huh, C. and Kim, C. O., Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of skew polynomial rings of automorphism type, Commun. Algebra 24 (7) (1996), 2317–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Krempa, J., Radicals and derivations of algebras, Proceedings of Eger Conference (North Holland, 1982).Google Scholar
8.Krause, G. R. and Lenagan, T. H., Growth of algebras and Gelfand–Kirillov dimension, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 22, (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2000).Google Scholar
9.McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Noncommutative Noetherian rings, Pure and Applied Mathematics (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1987).Google Scholar
10.Small, L. W. and Warfield, R. B. Jr., Prime affine algebras of Gelfand–Kirillov dimension one, J. Algebra 91 (2) (1984), 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar