No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BGG CATEGORY FOR THE QUANTUM SCHRÖDINGER ALGEBRA
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2020
Abstract
In 1996, a q-deformation of the universal enveloping algebra of the Schrödinger Lie algebra was introduced in Dobrev et al. [J. Phys. A 29 (1996) 5909–5918.]. This algebra is called the quantum Schrödinger algebra. In this paper, we study the Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand (BGG) category 
$\mathcal{O}$
for the quantum Schrödinger algebra 
$U_q(\mathfrak{s})$
, where q is a nonzero complex number which is not a root of unity. If the central charge 
$\dot z\neq 0$
, using the module 
$B_{\dot z}$
over the quantum Weyl algebra 
$H_q$
, we show that there is an equivalence between the full subcategory 
$\mathcal{O}[\dot Z]$
consisting of modules with the central charge 
$\dot z$
and the BGG category 
$\mathcal{O}^{(\mathfrak{sl}_2)}$
for the quantum group 
$U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$
. In the case that 
$\dot z = 0$
, we study the subcategory 
$\mathcal{A}$
consisting of finite dimensional 
$U_q(\mathfrak{s})$
-modules of type 1 with zero action of Z. We directly construct an equivalence functor from 
$\mathcal{A}$
to the category of finite dimensional representations of an infinite quiver with some quadratic relations. As a corollary, we show that the category of finite dimensional 
$U_q(\mathfrak{s})$
-modules is wild.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust
References
Andersen, H. H. and Mazorchuk, V., Category
$\mathcal{O}$
for quantum groups, J. Eur. Math.
Soc. 17 (2015), 405–431.Google Scholar
$\mathcal{O}$
for quantum groups, J. Eur. Math.
Soc. 17 (2015), 405–431.Google ScholarBavula, V. V., Classication of the simple modules of the quantum Weyl algebra and the quantum plane, in Quantum Groups and Quantum Spaces (Warsaw, Banach Center Publ., 1995), vol. 40. (Warsaw: Polish Acad. Sci.), 193–201.Google Scholar
Bernshtein, I., Gelfand, I. and Gelfand, S., A certain category of
$\mathfrak{g}$
-modules, Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 10(2) (1976), 1–8.Google Scholar
$\mathfrak{g}$
-modules, Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 10(2) (1976), 1–8.Google ScholarBavula, V. V. and Lu, T., The prime spectrum of the algebra
$K_q[X,Y]r times U_q(sl_2)$
and a classification of simple weight modules, J. Noncommut. Geom. 12(3) (2018), 889–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$K_q[X,Y]r times U_q(sl_2)$
and a classification of simple weight modules, J. Noncommut. Geom. 12(3) (2018), 889–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarBavula, V. V. and Lu, T., The universal enveloping algebra
$U(sl_2l \times V_2)$
, its prime spectrum and a classification of its simple weight modules. J. Lie Theory 28(2) (2018), 525–560.Google Scholar
$U(sl_2l \times V_2)$
, its prime spectrum and a classification of its simple weight modules. J. Lie Theory 28(2) (2018), 525–560.Google ScholarBavula, V. V. and Lu, T., The universal enveloping algebra of the Schrödinger algebra and its prime spectrum, Canad. Math. Bull. 61(4) (2018), 688–703.Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Cheng, Y. and Liu, G., Weight modules over the quantum Schrödinger algebra. Preprint. Revised version.Google Scholar
Cline, E., Parshall, B. and Scott, L., Finite-dimensional algebras and highest weight categories, J. Reine Angew. Math. 391 (1988), 85–99.Google Scholar
Dixmier, J., Enveloping algebras. Revised reprint of the 1977 translation. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 11 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).Google Scholar
Dobrev, V. K., Doebner, H. D., Mrugalla, C., Lowest weight representations of the Schrödinger algebra and generalized heat equations, Rept. Math.
Phys. 39 (1997) 201–218.Google Scholar
Dobrev, V. K., Doebner, H. D. and Mrugalla, C., A q-Schrödinger algebra, its lowest weight representations and generalized q-deformed heat/Schrödinger equations, J.
Phys. A 29 (1996) 5909–5918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubsky, B., Classification of simple weight modules with finite-dimensional weight spaces over the Schrödinger algebra, Lin. Algebra Appl. 443 (2014), 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubsky, B., Lu, R., Mazorchuk, V. and Zhao, K., Category
$\mathcal{O}$
for the Schrödinger algebra. Linear Algebra Appl. 460 (2014), 17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\mathcal{O}$
for the Schrödinger algebra. Linear Algebra Appl. 460 (2014), 17–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarGan, W. L. and Khare, A., Quantized symplectic oscillator algebras of rank one, J. Algebra 310(2) (2007), 671–707.Google Scholar
Humphreys, J., Representations of semisimple Lie algebras in the BGG category
$\mathcal{O}$
. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 94 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$\mathcal{O}$
. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 94 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarJantzen, J. C., Lectures in quantum groups, Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lü, R., Mazorchuk, V. and Zhao, K., On simple modules over conformal Galilei algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218 (2014), 1885–1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makedonskii, E., On wild and tame finite dimensional Lie Algebras. Functional Analysis and Its Applications 47(4) (2013), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazorchuk, V.. Lectures on
$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$
-modules (Imperial College Press, London, 2010).Google Scholar
$\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$
-modules (Imperial College Press, London, 2010).Google ScholarTikaradze, A. and Khare, A., Center and representations of infinitesimal Hecke algebras of
$sl_2$
, Comm.
Algebra 38(2) (2010), 405–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
$sl_2$
, Comm.
Algebra 38(2) (2010), 405–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPerroud, M.. Projective representations of the Schrödinger group. Helv. Phys. Acta 50(2) (1977), 233–252.Google Scholar