Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:02:17.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An embedding for π2 of a subcomplex of a finite contractible two-complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

William A. Bogley
William A. Bogley
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A longstanding open question in low dimensional topology was raised by J. H. C. Whitehead in 1941 [9]: “Is any subcomplex of an aspherical, two-dimensional complex itself aspherical?” The asphericity of classical knot complements [7] provides evidence that the answer to Whitehead's question might be “yes”. Indeed, each classical knot complement has the homotopy type of a two-complex which can be embedded in a finite contractible two-complex. This property is shared by a large class of four-manifolds; these are the ribbon disc complements, whose asphericity has been conjectured, and even claimed, but never proven. (See [4] for a discussion.) It is reasonable and convenient to formulate the following.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 365 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Bourbaki, N., Lie groups and Lie algebras, Chapters 1–3 (Springer-Verlag, 1989).Google Scholar
2.Cockroft, W. H., On two-dimensional aspherical complexes, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gutierrez, M. and Ratcliffe, J., On the second homotopy group, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 32 (1981), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Howie, J., On the asphericity of ribbon disc complements, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 289 (1985), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lyndon, R. C., Cohomology theory of groups with a single defining relation, Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 650–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Magnus, W., Über Beziehungen zwischen höheren Kommutatoren, J. Reine Angew. Math. 177 (1937), 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Papakyriakopoulos, C. D., On Dehn's lemma and the asphericity of knots, Ann. of Math. (2) 66 (1957), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Stallings, J., Homology and central series of groups, J. Algebra 2 (1965), 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Whitehead, J. H. C., On adding relations to homotopy groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 42 (1941), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Witt, E., Treue Darstellung Liescher Ringe, J. Reine Angew. Math. 177 (1937), 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar