Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:58:50.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transnational Governance Models: Codes of Conduct, and Monitoring Agencies as Tools to Increase Workers' Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Vanisha Sukdeo

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper critically explores how to implement changes to corporate behavior in regard to labor-related issues through codes of conduct (“code” or “codes”) that would strengthen the rights of workers. The corporation essentially allows for its own reformation from within. There are many ways the link between corporate governance or corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) and workers' rights can be explored. The term CSR is used to differentiate from the alternate shareholder primacy model of a corporation existing solely for its shareholders and to increase profit. It stands for the idea that corporations have duties to other stakeholders beyond shareholders. Those stakeholders include, but are not limited to, employees and those who produce goods and provide services, environmental agencies, and government. Codes are a soft law mechanism that may be used to create a voluntary standard or set of rules to which corporations are bound. While this may be viewed as rather insubstantial compared to legislation, codes have value in terms of allowing the two (or more) parties that are bound by the code to have direct input in drafting the code. While the inherent imbalance of power involved in the dynamics of the employment relationship between management and workers must be acknowledged and must have an impact on the creation of the code, it does allow for involvement at a level which legislation does not. Part two of this paper examines governance models, Part three discusses codes of conduct as a private regulatory framework, and Part four shows how monitoring agencies are used to ensure compliance with codes.

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 13 , Issue 12: 5Th CLPE Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy Network: Transnational Private Regulatory Governance: Regimes, Dialogue, Constitutionalization , 01 December 2012 , pp. 1559 - 1570
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Sometimes those who produce goods and services for a certain company may not be “employees” of that company but still have rights and obligations that flow from such a relationship even though it may not be termed an “employment relationship.”Google Scholar

2 Charles Sabel, Dara O'Rourke & Fung, Archon, Ratcheting Labor Standards: Regulation for Continuous Improvement in the Global Workplace 25, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=253833 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

3 Compa, Lance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Workers’ Rights 4, available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/183/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

4 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

5 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

6 Id. Google Scholar

7 Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-44.Google Scholar

8 Barrientos, Stephanie, Mapping Codes Through the Value Chain: from Researcher to Detective, in CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND LABOUR RIGHTS: CODES OF CONDUCT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 67 (Rhys Jenkins, Ruth Pearson and Gill Seyfang eds., 2002).Google Scholar

9 Arthurs, Harry, Profit, Power and Law in the Global Economy, in ETHICS CODES, CORPORATIONS, AND THE CHALLENGE OF GLOBALIZATION, 55 (Wesley Cragg ed., 2003).Google Scholar

10 Id. at 58.Google Scholar

11 Wood, Stepan, Codes: Problematizations, Authorizations and the Public/Private Divide, in ETHICS CODES, CORPORATIONS, AND THE CHALLENGE OF GLOBALIZATION, 247 (Wesley Cragg ed., 2003).Google Scholar

12 Jenkins, Rhys, The Political Economy of Codes of Conduct, in CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND LABOUR RIGHTS: CODES OF CONDUCT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY 28 (Rhys Jenkins, Ruth Pearson & Gill Seyfang eds., 2002).Google Scholar

13 Sabel, O'Rourke & Fung, , supra note 2.Google Scholar

14 Jenkins, , supra note 12, at 15.Google Scholar

15 I hope to explore the intersection of guilt and ethical consumption in later work, as it is important to note that once consumers are better informed they may feel guilty purchasing products that do not meet ethical standards of production.Google Scholar

16 Sabel, O'Rourke & Fung, supra note 2, at 1.Google Scholar

17 Id. at 35.Google Scholar

18 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

20 Murray, Jill, Labour Rights/Corporate Responsibilities: the Role of ILO Labour Standards, in CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY AND LABOUR RIGHTS: CODES OF CONDUCT IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 33 (Rhys Jenkins, Ruth Pearson and Gill Seyfang, eds., 2002).Google Scholar

21 Queen's University Code of Conduct, available at: http://www.queensu.ca/studentaffairs/trademarklicensing/codeofconduct.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

22 WRC, Affiliate schools, available at: http://www.workersrights.org/about/as.asp (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

23 FLA, Affiliate schools, available at: http://www.fairlabor.org/fla/go.asp?u=/pub/mp&Page=CollegesUniversities (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

24 Queen's University Code of Conduct, supra note 21.Google Scholar

25 Sabel, O'Rourke & Fung, , supra note 2, at 22.Google Scholar

26 SETHI, S. PRAKASH ed., GLOBALIZATION AND SELF-REGULATION: THE CRUCIAL ROLE THAT CORPORATE CODES OF CONDUCT PLAY IN GLOBAL BUSINESS, 13 (2011): “There must be an independent external monitoring and compliance verification system to engender public trust and credibility in the industry's claims of performance. Performance with code compliance on the part of member companies or groups must be subjected to independent external monitoring and compliance verification. It is in this area that companies and industries offer the most resistance. It is argued that external monitoring would create an environment of distrust and policing.”Google Scholar

27 WRC, ‘Mission’, available at: http://www.workersrights.org/about/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

28 Sabel, O'Rourke & Fung, , supra note 2, at 24.Google Scholar

29 Id. at 23.Google Scholar

30 Jenkins, , supra note 12, at27.Google Scholar

31 Id. at 28.Google Scholar

32 FLA, ‘About Us’, available at: http://www.fairlabor.org/fla/go.asp?u=/pub/mp&Page=About_Menu (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar

33 Sabel, O'Rourke & Fung, , supra note 2, at 23.Google Scholar

34 Jenkins, supra note 12, at 26.Google Scholar

35 SETHI, supra note 26, at 11.Google Scholar