Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Since the 1980s, influential participants in the niche over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets have sought to encourage contractual standardization in the industry to mitigate the potential for unforeseen legal interruptions and ensure the enforceability of OTC derivatives contracts. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), a trade association and standard-setter, has spearheaded this effort; resulting in the creation and sustenance of a highly successful transnational private regulatory regime (TPRER). Most notably, ISDA has generated a standardized boilerplate contract for OTC derivatives, known as the ‘ISDA Master Agreement’. However, the TPRER within which the ISDA Master Agreement operates displays some intriguing features and paradoxes. Chief amongst these paradoxes is that, while this TPRER appears at first glance to be highly legalistic and formal, indications are that rates of formal litigation between members of the regulatory regime have traditionally been low relative to the size of the market (the total notional amount of OTC derivatives contracts outstanding at the end of 2011 was estimated at US$648 trillion).
1 For broader discussion of TPRERs, see e.g., Colin Scott, Fabrizio Cafaggi & Linda Senden, The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation, 38 J. of L. & Soc. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
2 Riles, Annelise, Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets 30 (2011) [hereinafter “Riles (2011)”].Google Scholar
3 Bank for International Settlements, OTC Derivatives Statistics as at End-December 2011 (May 2012), available online at: http://www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy1205.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); However, it should also be noted that notional estimates are subject to certain limitations. See also ISDA, OTC Derivatives Market Analysis, Year-End 2011 (June 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/research/studies/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
4 For the purposes of this paper, ‘interpretative interference’ in the context of transnational private regulation (TPR) is considered to arise where private standard-setters (in this case ISDA) are faced with ‘final interpretations of their standards by national courts or other bodies which run counter to their own interpretations, and which could have significant consequences for market practice, but which they do not necessarily have any opportunity to influence'’; this is as elaborated in Julia Black & David Rouch, The Development of the Global Markets as Rule-Makers: Engagement and Legitimacy, L. & Finan'l Mkts. Rev. 218, 225 (2008).Google Scholar
5 Stout, Lynn, Derivatives and the Legal Origin of the 2008 Credit Crisis, 1 Harv. Busi. L. Rev. 301, 304 (2011).Google Scholar
6 Lynch, Timothy, Derivatives: A Twenty First Century Understanding (Indiana University School of Law -Bloomington Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 187, March 2011), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1785634 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
7 Gerding, Eric, Credit Derivatives, Leverage and Financial Regulation's Missing Macroeconomic Dimension, 8 Berk. Bus. L. J. 101, 113-115 (2011).Google Scholar
8 A counterparty is exposed to a particular risk and seeks to shift that risk to another party better placed or willing to bear it. See Kimberly Krawiec, Derivatives, Corporate Hedging and Shareholder Wealth: Motigliani-Miller Forty Years Later, University of Illinois Law Review 1039 (1998); Henry T.C. Hu, Hedging Expectations: “Derivative Reality” and the Law and Finance of the Corporate Objective, 21 J. of Cop'n L. 3 (1995).Google Scholar
9 A counterparty is willing to assume risk and/or seeks to capitalize on superior information regarding price movements without necessarily having direct exposure to the ‘underlying’. See e.g., Albert Kyle, Informed Speculation with Imperfect Competition, 56 Rev. of Econ. Stud. 317 (1989).Google Scholar
10 The exploitation of a ‘gap between the economic substance of a transaction and its legal or regulatory treatment, taking advantage of the legal system's intrinsically limited ability to attach formal labels that track the economics of transactions with sufficient precision', Victor Fleischer, Regulatory Arbitrage, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 227, 229 (2011); Frank Partnoy, Financial Derivatives and the Costs of Regulatory Arbitrage, 22 J. of Cop'n L. 211 (1997).Google Scholar
11 For further discussion see e.g., Frank Partnoy, Infectious Greed: How Deceit and Risk Corrupted the Financial Markets 11-12 (2009).Google Scholar
12 Feder, Norman, Deconstructing Over-the-Counter Derivatives, 3 Col. Bus. L. Rev. 677, 692 (2002).Google Scholar
13 Feder, , supra note 12, at 700.Google Scholar
14 Id. Google Scholar
15 Shadab, Houman, Guilty By Association? Regulating Credit Default Swaps, 4 Entr'l Bus. L. J. 407, 431-432 (2010).Google Scholar
16 For further discussion of CDS, including sovereign CDS in the context of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis, see e.g., Anna Gelpern & Mitu Gulati, CDS Zombies, 13 Eur. Bus. Org'n L. Rev. 347 (2012).Google Scholar
17 See e.g., Jacques, Laurent, Global Derivative Debacles: From Theory to Malpractice (2010); Don Chance, Essays in Derivatives 16-17 (1998).Google Scholar
18 See e.g., Dick Bryan and Michael Rafferty, Financial Derivatives: The New Gold? 10 Competition & Change 265 (2006).Google Scholar
19 See e.g., Mahoney, Paul, The Exchange as Regulator, 83 Vir. L. Rev. 1453 (1997); Stephen Pirrong, The Self-Regulation of Commodity Exchanges: The Case of Market Manipulation, 38 J. of L. and Econ. 141 (1995).Google Scholar
20 On CCPs see e.g., Craig Pirrong, The Economics of Central Clearing: Theory and Practice (ISDA Discussion Papers No. 1, May 2011), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/research/discussion-papers/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Stephen Ceccheti, Jacob Gyntelberg & Marc Hollanders, Central Counterparties for Over-the-Counter Derivatives, Bank for International Settlements Qtl'y Rev. 45, 47 (September 2009); See also Franklin Edwards, The Clearing Association in Futures Markets: Guarantor and Regulator, 3 J. of Fut's Mkts 369 (1983).Google Scholar
21 Romano, Roberta, A Thumbnail Sketch of Derivative Securities and Their Regulation, 55 Mrly'd L. Rev. 1, 16-21 (1996).Google Scholar
22 Board, Financial Stability, International Monetary Fund and Bank for International Settlements, Report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Governors: Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations (7 November 2009), available online at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_091107c.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
23 See e.g., Greenberger, Michael, Overwhelming a Financial Regulatory Black Hole with Legislative Sunlight: Dodd-Frank's Attack on Systemic Economic Destabilization Caused by an Unregulated Multi-Trillion Dollar Derivatives Market, 6 J. of Bus. and Tech. L. 127 (2011).Google Scholar
24 See Bank for International Settlements, Statistics on Exchange Traded Derivatives (September 2012), available online at: http://www.bis.org/statistics/extderiv.htm (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Bank for International Settlements, Semiannual OTC Derivatives Statistics at End-June 2012 (November 2012), available online at: http://www.bis.org/statistics/derstats.htm (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
25 See e.g., Stulz, René, Should We Fear Derivatives?, 18 J. of Econ. Persp. 173, 182 (2004).Google Scholar
26 See e.g., Henry, Hu, Too Complex to Depict? Innovation, “Pure Information”, and the SEC Disclosure Paradigm, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 1601 (2012); Robert Bartlett III, Inefficiencies in the Information Thicket: A Case Study of Derivatives Disclosures During the Financial Crisis 36 J. of Corp'n L. 1 (2010).Google Scholar
27 See e.g., Lynch, Timothy, Gambling By Another Name? The Challenge of Purely Speculative Derivatives (Indiana University Maurer School of Law-Bloomington Legal Research Paper Series No. 188, March 2011), available online at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1788219 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
28 For an overview of key risks in derivatives transactions see e.g., Kimberly Krawiec, More Than Just New “Financial Bingo”: A Risk-Based Approach to Understanding Derivatives, 23 J. of Corp'n L. 1, 17-50 (1997).Google Scholar
29 See e.g., Blizzard, Keith, The Law of Financial Derivatives in Ireland (2011).Google Scholar
30 Hedge funds can be defined as entities which ‘capture private pools of capital for collective investment by sophisticated professional —qualified investors, with no or limited regulatory constraints on what the vehicle invests in, allowing short selling in addition to or instead of classic long only investments, using leverage to finance securities positions and magnify funds’ return to investors, the use of derivatives to take on or hedge out risks, and generally much more active trading than long – only mutual funds', Wouter Eechoud et. al., Future Regulation of Hedge Funds: A Systemic Risk Perspective (2010) 19 Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 269, 274 (2010).Google Scholar
31 Mengle, David, Concentration of OTC Derivatives Among Major Dealers (ISDA: Research Notes No. 4, 2010), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/search?keyword=concentration (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
32 Cameron, Matt, ‘G14 Dealer Group Adds Two Members’, Risk.net (1 December 2011), available online at: http://www.risk.net/risk-magazine/news/2127940/g14-dealer-adds (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
33 For discussion see e.g., Darrell Duffie, Market Making under the Proposed Volcker Rule (Rock Centre for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 106, 16 January 2012), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1990472 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
34 High-Level Expert Group on Reforming the Structure of the EU Banking Sector, Final Report 42 (2 October 2012), available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/bank/docs/high-level_expert_group/report_en.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
35 For recent geographical breakdowns on market size see e.g., The City UK, Derivatives 2012, available online at: http://www.thecityuk.com/research/our-work/reports-list/derivatives-2012/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
36 See e.g., Sapien, Brendan, Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction: From Bucket Shops to Credit Default Swaps, 19 Southern Cal. Intdscp'ry L. J. 411 (2010); Lynn Stout, Why the Law Hates Speculators: Regulation and Private Ordering in the Market for OTC Derivatives, 48 Duke L. J. 701 (1999); Patrick Raines & Charles Leathers, Financial Derivative Instruments and Social Ethics, 13 J. of Bus. Ethics 197 (1994); Thomas Hazen, Rational Investments, Speculation, or Gambling? – Derivative Securities and Financial Futures and their Effect on the Underlying Capital Markets, 86 Northw'n Univ. L. Rev. 987 (1992).Google Scholar
37 See e.g., Hodgson, Raphael, The Birth of the Swap, 65 Fin'l A'lysts J. 1 (2009).Google Scholar
38 For discussion and overview of the Efficient Capital Markets Hypothesis (EMH) see e.g., Eugene Fama, Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, 25 J. of Fin. 383 (1970).Google Scholar
39 c. 60.Google Scholar
40 Section 63 of the Financial Services Act 1986 (UK).Google Scholar
41 c. 8, section 412.Google Scholar
42 For discussion see e.g., Daniel Awrey, The FSA, Integrated Regulation and the Curious Case of OTC Derivatives, 13 University of Penn. J. of Bus. L. 1, 46 (2010).Google Scholar
43 Under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-463, 88 Stat. 1389 (1974) (CFTA)(US).Google Scholar
44 See e.g., Gibson, Wilma, Are Swap Agreements Securities or Futures? The Inadequacies of Applying the Traditional Regulatory Approach to OTC Derivatives Transactions, 24 J. of Corp'n L. 379 (1999).Google Scholar
45 Becker, Brandon & Yoon, Jennifer, Derivative Financial Losses, 21 J. of Corp'n L. 215 (1995).Google Scholar
46 Jorion, Philippe, Big Bets Gone Bad: Derivatives and Bankruptcy in Orange County (1995).Google Scholar
47 Jongho, Kim, Can Risks be Reduced in the Derivatives Market? Lessons from the Deal Structure Analysis of Modern Financial Engineering Debacles, 6 DePaul Bus. and Comm. L. J. 29 (2007).Google Scholar
48 CFTC, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Concept Release (7 May 1998), available online at: http://www.cftc.gov/opa/press98/opamntn.htm (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
49 See e.g., Summers, Lawrence, Testimony Before the US Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry on the CFTC Concept Release (30 July 1998), available online at: http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/rr2616.aspx (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
50 US Department of the Treasury, Joint Statement by Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt (7 May 1998), available online at: http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/rr2426.aspx (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
51 See e.g., Morgan, Glenn, Reforming OTC Markets: The Politics and Economics of Technical Fixes, 13 Eur. Bus. Org'n L. Rev. 391 (2012); US President's Working Group on Financial Markets, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets and the Commodity Exchange Act (November 1999), available online at: [http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/fin-mkts/documents/otcact.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
52 Pub. Law No. 106 – 554, 114 Stat. 2763 (2000) (US).Google Scholar
53 For instance Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Council and of the Parliament on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC [2004] OJ L 145 (MiFID).Google Scholar
54 Garber, Peter, Famous First Bubbles, 4 J. of Econ. Persp's 35 (1990).Google Scholar
55 Partnoy, Frank, Enron and Derivatives: Testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Government Affairs (24 January 2002), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=302332 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
56 See e.g., Stephanie Bodoni et. al., ‘ECB Wins Ruling to Deny Access to Secret Greek Swap Files’, Bloomberg (29 November 2012), available online at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-29/ecb-wins-ruling-to-deny-access-to-secret-greek-swap-files.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
57 For instance, the role of OTC derivatives in the interbank rate setting scandals and mis-selling controversies. See e.g., UK Treasury, The Wheatley Review of LIBOR: Final Report (September 2012), available online at: http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/wheatley_review_libor_finalreport_280912.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); UK FSA, FSA Agrees Settlement with Four Banks Over Interest Rate Hedging Products (29 June 2012), available online at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/library/communication/pr/2012/071.shtml (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
58 See e.g., Langevoort, Donald, Chasing the Greased Pig Down Wall Street: A Gatekeepers Guide to the Psychology, Culture and Ethics of Financial Risk-Taking, 96 Cor. L. Rev. 1209 (2011); Erik Gerding, Code, Crash and Open Source: The Outsourcing of Financial Regulation to Risk Models and the Global Financial Crisis, 84 Wash. L. Rev. 127 (2009); UK FSA, The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (March 2009) [http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/turner_review.pdf]; Raghuram Rajan, Has Financial Development Made the World Riskier? (NBER Working Paper, 2005), available online at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11728.pdf?new_window=1 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
59 Viral Acharya et. al., Guaranteed to Fail: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Debacle of Mortgage Finance (2011); Michael Lewis, The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine (2010); David Faber, And Then the Roof Caved In: How Wall Street's Greed and Stupidity Brought Capitalism to its Knees (2009); Andrew Sorkin, Too-Big-To-Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System – And Themselves (2009); Markus Brunnermeier, Deciphering the Liquidity and Credit Crunch 2007-2008, 23 J. of Econ. Persp's 77 (2009); Gillian Tett, Fool's Gold: How Unrestrained Greed Corrupted a Dream, Shattered Global Markets and Unleashed a catastrophe (2009).Google Scholar
60 See e.g., Gorton, Gary, Slapped in the Face by the Invisible Hand: Banking and the Panic of 2007 (Yale University and National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, May 2009) 8, available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1401882 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
61 For discussion of some dynamics of human risk taking in derivatives markets see e.g., John Coates and Joe Herbert, Endogenous Steroids and Financial Risk Taking on a London Trading Floor, 105 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 6167 (2008). See also, Andrew Lo and Dmitry Repin, The Psychophysiology of Real-Time Financial Risk Processing, 14 J. of Cog. Neurosc. 323 (2002).Google Scholar
62 William Sjostrum Jnr., The AIG Bailout, 66 W. & L. L. Rev. 943 (2009); UK FSA, The Failure of the Royal Bank of Scotland (December 2011), available online at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/static/pubs/other/rbs.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
63 See e.g., Mody, Ashoka & Sandri, Damiano, The Eurozone Crisis: How Banks and Sovereigns Came to be Joined at the Hip (International Monetary Fund Working Paper 11/269, 2011), available online at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp11269.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
64 G20, Leaders’ Statement: The Pittsburgh Summit (24-25 September 2009), available online at: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2009/2009communique0925.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
65 Financial Stability Board, OTC Derivatives Market Reform: Fourth Progress Report on Implementation (31 October 2012), available online at: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121031a.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); CFTC and SEC, Joint Report on International Swap Regulation (31 January 2012), available online at: http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2012/sec-cftc-intlswapreg.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
66 See e.g., Johnson, Christian, Regulatory Arbitrage, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and Dodd-Frank: The Implications of Global US OTC Derivative Regulation (University of Utah College of Law Working Paper, 30 October 2012), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2169401 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
67 For further discussion on this, see Morgan, supra note 51.Google Scholar
68 In re Lehman Brothers Inc., US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 08-13555.Google Scholar
69 See e.g., Reinhart, Vincent, A Year of Living Dangerously: The Management of the Financial Crisis in 2008, 25 J. of Econ. Persp's 71 (2011).Google Scholar
70 For discussion see e.g., Satyajit Das, In the Matter of Lehman Brothers, 59 Wilmott 20 (2012).Google Scholar
71 See Coleton, Adrienne, Banking Insolvency Regimes and Cross-Border Banks — Complexities and Conflicts: Is the Current European Insolvency Framework Efficient and Robust Enough to Effectively Resolve Cross-Border Banks, Can There Be a One Size Fits All Solution?, 27 J. of Int'l Bank'g L. and Reg. 63 (2012); Barbara Attinger, Crisis Management and Bank Resolution Quo Vadis, Europe? (ECB Legal Working Paper Series, December 2011), available online at: http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scplps/ecblwp13.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
72 Black and Rouch, supra note 4.Google Scholar
73 Flanagan, Sean, The Rise of a Trade Association: Group Interactions within the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, 6 Harv. Neg. L. Rev. 211, 235 (2001); Jeffrey Golden, Setting Standards in the Evolution of Swap Documentation, 13 Int'l Fin.'l L. Rev. 18 (1994).Google Scholar
74 For further discussion of ISDA see e.g., Heather McKeen-Edwards and Tony Porter, Transnational financial Associations and the Governance of Global Finance: Assembling Power and Wealth (2012, forthcoming); Glenn Morgan, Power and Legitimacy in Financial Markets: Credit Default Swaps in the Current Crisis, 8 Socio-Economic Rev. 17 (2010).Google Scholar
75 Harding, Paul, Mastering the ISDA Master Agreements (1992 and 2002) (2010).Google Scholar
76 Partnoy, , supra note 11, at 293, noting that ‘[a]nyone who imagined that members of Congress, or their staffs, drafted laws regarding derivatives would have been surprised to peek inside the offices of the House Agriculture Committee during the time Congress was considering the CFMA. Instead of seeing members of Congress at work, you would have seen Mark Brickell, the lobbyist from ISDA, writing important pieces of the legislation'’.Google Scholar
77 On a similar theme in the context of collective action clauses (CACs), see Anna Gelpern & Mitu Gulati, Public Symbol in Private Contract: A Case Study, 84 Wash. Univ. L. Rev. 1627 (2006); More broadly, see e.g., Mark Suchman, The Contract as Social Artefact, 37 l. and Soc. Rev. 91 (2003).Google Scholar
78 Pickel, Robert, Testimony Before the United States Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry (Washington D.C.: 14th October 2008) (on file with author).Google Scholar
79 ISDA, Members List (20 August 2012), available online at: http://www.isda.org/membership/institutionallist.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
80 ISDA, Primary Members List (20 August 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/about-isda/ioin-isda/primary-members (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
81 ISDA, Subscriber Members List (20 August 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/about-isda/ioin-isda/subscriber-members (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
82 ISDA, Associate Members List (20 August 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/about-isda/ioin-isda/associate-members (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
83 Litan, Robert, The Derivatives Dealers’ Club and Derivatives Markets Reform: A Guide for Policy Makers, Citizens and Other Interested Parties (Initiative on Business and Public Policy, Brookings 7 April 2010) (on file with author).Google Scholar
84 ISDA, Board of Directors, available online at: http://www2.isda.org/about-isda/board-of-directors/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
85 On producer influence in TPR see e.g., Daniel Mügge, Private-Public Puzzles: Inter-firm Competition and Transnational Private Regulation, 11 New Polt'l Econ. 177 (2006).Google Scholar
86 On compression see e.g., Nicholas Vause, Counterparty Risk and Contract Volumes in the Credit Default Swap Market, Bank for Int'l Sttl'ts Qt'ly Rev. 59, 63 (December 2010).Google Scholar
87 Federal Reserve Bank of New York, OTC Derivatives Supervisors Group, available online at: http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/otc_derivatives_supervisors_group.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
88 See e.g., ISDA, Supporting G20 Objectives, available online at: http://www2.isda.org/G20objectives (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
89 Choi, Stephen & Gulati, Mitu, Contract as Statute, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1129, 1139-1140 (2006).Google Scholar
90 ISDA Master Agreement 2002 Users Guide (on file with author).Google Scholar
91 Choi, & Gulati, , supra note 89, at 1140.Google Scholar
92 ISDA, ISDA Margin Survey 2012 (1 May 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/research/surveys/margin-surveys/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
93 See e.g., Johnson, Christian, A Guide to Using and Negotiating OTC Derivatives Documentation (2005).Google Scholar
94 ISDA, Auction Hardwiring, available online at: http://www.isda.org/companies/auctionhardwiring/auctionhardwiring.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
95 ISDA, Small Bang Protocol, available online at: http://www.isda.org/smallbang/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
96 See e.g. ISDA, The ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees (June 2012), available online at: http://dc.isda.org/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
97 See e.g., ISDA, Proposal to UNIDROIT for a Netting Convention (London: 15th March 2008), available online at: https://www.isdadocs.org/speeches/pdf/Unidroit-NetConv-Mar.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
98 See e.g., Biggins, John & Scott, Colin, Public-Private Relations in a Transnational Private Regulatory Regime: ISDA, the State and OTC Derivatives Market Reform, 13 Eur. Bus. Org'n L. Rev. 309 (2012).Google Scholar
99 See e.g., Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Report and Recommendations of the Cross-Border Bank Resolution Group (March 2010), available online at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs169.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012); United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNICTRAL), Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law (New York, 2005), available online at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/insolven/05-80722_Ebook.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
100 For discussion of this interaction between ISDA and nation states, see Biggins & Scott, supra note 98.Google Scholar
101 See e.g., Duffie, Darrell & David Skeel Jnr., A Dialogue on the Costs and Benefits of Automatic Stays for Derivatives and Repurchase Agreements (Stanford University Working Paper No. 108, 1 March 2012), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1982095 (last accessed: 1 December 2012); Mark Roe, The Derivatives Market's Payment Priorities as Financial Crisis Accelerator, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 539 (2011); Stephen Lubben, Repeal the Safe Harbours, 18 Am. Bnkr'y Inst. L. Rev. 319 (2010).Google Scholar
102 Biggins, & Scott, , supra note 98.Google Scholar
103 ISDA, Opinions, available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/legal-and-documentation/opinions (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
104 Id. Google Scholar
105 Riles (2011), supra note 2, at 41.Google Scholar
106 Id. at 56.Google Scholar
107 Riles, Annelise, The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State, 56 Amer. J. of Comp. L. 605, 612 (2008).Google Scholar
108 Such as Lisa Bernstein, Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry, 21 J. of Leg. Stud. 115 (1992); Robert. Ellickson, Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbours in Shasta County, 38 Stan. L. Rev. 624 (1986).Google Scholar
109 Riles (2011), supra note 2, at 56-57.Google Scholar
110 Id. at 4.Google Scholar
111 Casey, Donal & Scott, Colin, The Crystallization of Regulatory Norms, 38 J. of Law & Soc. 76, 81 (2011).Google Scholar
112 Riles (2011), supra note 2, at 57.Google Scholar
113 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., et al. v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, 10-ap-03266, US Bankruptcy Court (SDNY, Manhattan).Google Scholar
114 ISDA, available online at: 2009 ISDA Collateral Dispute Resolution Procedure (September 30, 2009) available online at: http://www.isda.org/c_and_a/pdf/ISDA-Collateral-Committee-Dispute-Resolution-Proposal-Briefing.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
115 Riles (2011), supra note 2, at 62.Google Scholar
116 ISDA, Users Guide to the 2002 Master Agreement (on file with author).Google Scholar
117 As have others. See e.g., Ralf Michaels, The Re-state-ment of Non-State Law: The State, Choice of Law and the Challenge of Global Legal Pluralism, 51 Wayne L. Rev. 1209 (2005).Google Scholar
118 See e.g., Teubner, Gunther, “Global Bukowina”: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in Global Law Without a State (Gunther Teubner ed., 1997).Google Scholar
119 Robert, Wai, The Interlegality of Transnational Private Law, 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 107, 114 (2008) [hereinafter “Wai (2008)”].Google Scholar
120 Robert, Wai, Transnational Liftoff and Juridical Touchdown: The Regulatory Function of Private International Law in an Era of Globalization, 40 Col. J. of Transn'l L. 209, 265 (2002).Google Scholar
121 Wai (2008), supra note 119, at 116.Google Scholar
122 Robert, Wai, Transnational Private Law and Private Ordering in a Contested Global Society, 46 Harv. Int'l L. J. 471, 483 (2005).Google Scholar
123 Scott, Colin, Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design, Public Law 283 (2001).Google Scholar
124 See e.g., Michaels, Ralf, The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State, 14 Ind'a. J. of Glob. Leg. Stud. 447 (2007).Google Scholar
125 Wai (2008), supra note 119, at 122-123.Google Scholar
126 For further discussion see e.g., Philipp Paech, The Need for an International Instrument on the Enforceability of Close-Out Netting in General and in the Context of Bank Resolution (Preliminary Draft Report, UNIDRIOT Study Group on Principles and Rules on the Netting of Financial Instruments, March 2011), available online at: http://www.unidroit.org/english/documents/2011/study78c/s-78c-02-e.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
127 On a similar theme, see e.g., Jonathan Ross, The Case for P.R.I.M.E. Finance: P.R.I.M.E. Finance Cases, 7 Cap. MKT's L. J. 221 (2012).Google Scholar
128 Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council & Ors [1992] 2 AC 1. For discussion see e.g., Andrew Tickle, Creative Finance and the Local State: The Hammersmith and Fulham Swaps Affair, 17 Pol. Geog. 865 (1998).Google Scholar
129 In particular section 111(1) of the UK Local Government Act 1972 which stipulated that ‘a local authority shall have power to do anything (whether or not involving the expenditure, borrowing or lending of money or the acquisition or disposal of any property or rights) which is calculated to facilitate, or is conducive or incidental to, the discharge of any of their functions'’.Google Scholar
130 Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council & Ors [1992] 2 AC 1, 36.Google Scholar
131 Ibid., 37, per Lord Templeman.Google Scholar
132 See e.g., Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council & Ors [1998] 3 WLR 1095; Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] AC 669; Morgan Grenfell v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [1995] 1 All ER 1.Google Scholar
133 Hudson, Alastair, Dealing with Derivatives (on file with author).Google Scholar
134 Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y. 375 F.3d 168, 182 (2nd Cir. 2004); Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y., No 02 Civ.1312 (LMM)(GWG), 2003 WL 21305355 (S.D.N.Y. June 5th, 2003); Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y., No. 02 Civ.1312(LMM), 2002 WL 31426310 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2002) [hereinafter litigation].Google Scholar
135 See e.g., Gelpern, Anna, After Argentina, 2005-PB05-2 Institute for International Economics Working Paper (2005), available online at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=880794 (last accessed: 1 December 2012). On the dynamics of sovereign debt restructurings more broadly, see Udaibir Das, Michael Papaioannou & Christoph Trebesch, Sovereign Debt Restructurings 1950-2010: Literature Survey, Data and Stylized Facts (IMF Working Paper 12/203, August 2012), available online at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12203.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
136 For further discussion, see Gelpern & Gulati, supra note 16.Google Scholar
137 See list of litigation cases, supra note 134.Google Scholar
138 Warnot, James & Williamson, Justin, ISDA Definitions Unclear, Says U.S Court, 23 Int'l Fin'l L. Rev. 27 (2004).Google Scholar
139 For discussion, see e.g., Hemel, Daniel, Empty Creditors and Debt Exchanges, 27 Yale J. on Reg. 159, 162 (2011); Jongho Kim, From Vanilla Swaps to Exotic Credit Derivatives: How to Approach the Interpretation of Credit Events, 13 Fordham J. of Corp. & Fin'l L. 705 (2008).Google Scholar
140 See e.g., Clarke, Blanaid, Where Was the Market for Corporate Control When We Needed It?, in Corporate Governance and the Global Financial Crisis: International Perspectives, (William Sun, Jim Stewart & David Pollard eds., 2011); Henry Hu & Bernard Black, Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extensions, 156 Univ. of Penn. L. Rev. 625 (2008); Shaun Martin & Frank Partnoy, Encumbered Shares, 3 Univ. of Ill. L. Rev. 775 (2005).Google Scholar
141 CSX Corporation v the Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP & Others (08 Civ. 2764 (LAK) (SDNY, 11 June 2008)).Google Scholar
142 ISDA, Amicus Briefs, available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/legal-and-documentation/amicus-briefs (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
143 For discussion, see e.g., Daniel Bertaccini, To Disclose or Not to Disclose? CSX Corp., Total Return Swaps, and Their Implications for Schedule 13D Filing Purposes, 31 Card. L. Rev. 267 (2009); Brian Sullivan, CSX Corp. v Children's Investment Fund Management and the Need for SEC Expansion of Beneficial Ownership, 87 North Car. L‥ Rev. 1300 (2009).Google Scholar
144 For further discussion in a similar vein see e.g., Frank Partnoy, ISDA, NASD, CFMA and SDNY: The Four Horsemen of Derivatives Regulation? (Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2002).Google Scholar
145 Henderson, S.K., Credit Derivatives and Operational Risk, or Why a Credit Default Swap is Not Like a Bond, 1 L. and Fin'l Mkts Rev. 31 (2007).Google Scholar
146 See Humer, Caroline, Lehman Emerges from 3.5 Year Bankruptcy, Reuters (6 March 2012), available online at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/06/us-lehman-idUSTRE8250WY20120306 (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
147 Sandler, Linda, JPMorgan Wins Narrowing of $8.6 Billion Lehman Lawsuit, Bloomberg (20 April 2012), available online at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-19/jpmorgan-wins-narrowing-of-8-6-billion-lehman-lawsuit-1-.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
148 ISDA, Amicus Brief in Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2 February 2011), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/legal-and-documentation/amicus-briefs/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
149 ISDA, ISDA Welcomes the English Court of Appeal's Decision to Uphold ISDA Master Agreement in LBIE Judgement (3 April 2012), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/news/isda-welcomes-the-english-court-of-appeals-decision-to-uphold-isda-master-agreement-in-lbie-iudgment (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
150 See e.g., Sandler, Linda, JPMorgan Sued by Lehman Over $2.2 Billion Derivatives Claims, Bloomberg (17 September 2012), available online at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-17/jpmorgan-sued-by-lehman-over-2-2-billion-derivatives-claims-1-.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
151 Partnoy, Frank, Second-Order Benefits from Standards, 48 Bost. Coll. L. Rev. 169, 187 (2007).Google Scholar
152 Gelpern, Anna, Commentary: Public Promises and Organizational Agendas, 51 Ariz. L. Rev. 57 (2009).Google Scholar
153 Gelpern, , supra note 152.Google Scholar
154 Black, & Rouch, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
155 Id. Google Scholar
156 Suchman, Mark, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, 20 Acad. of Mngm't Rev. 571 (1995).Google Scholar
157 Cashore, Benjamin, Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule Making Authority, 15 Governance 503, 511-512 (2002).Google Scholar
158 Cashore, , supra note 157, at 512.Google Scholar
159 On a similar theme see e.g., Isabelle Huault & Hélène Rainelli-Le Montagner, Market Shaping as an Answer to Ambiguities: The Case of Credit Derivatives, 30 Org'n Stud. 549 (2009).Google Scholar
160 Black, Julia, Enrolling Actors in Regulatory Processes: Examples from UK Financial Services Regulation, Pub. L. 62 (2003).Google Scholar
161 ISDA, The Use of Arbitration under the ISDA Master Agreement: Feedback and Policy Options (10 November 2011), available online at: http://www2.isda.org/search?keyword=arbitration (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
162 Particularly in Gelpern & Gulati, supra note 16.Google Scholar
163 P.R.I.M.E. Finance, About Us, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/about-us (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
164 P.R.I.M.E. Finance, Press Coverage, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/news-blog/press-coverage (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
165 World Legal Forum, Call for the Establishment of an International Dispute Resolution Facility for the Financial Markets in the Hague (25 October 2010), available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/images/WLF_20101025_Press_Financial_Roundtable.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
166 P.R.I.M.E. Finance, About PRIME Finance Arbitration Rules, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/arbitration (last accessed: 1 December 2012); P.R.I.M.E. Finance, About PRIME Finance Mediation Rules, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/mediation.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
167 P.R.I.M.E. Finance, Dispute Resolution Experts, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/expert-list (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
168 For a good overview of existing literature on PRIME Finance, see P.R.I.M.E. Finance, Press Coverage, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/news-blog/press-coverage.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
169 P.R.I.M.E. Finance, Finance Experts, available online at: http://www.primefinancedisputes.org/index.php/expert-list/financial-experts.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
170 Black, & Rouch, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
171 Wai (2008), supra note 119.Google Scholar
172 Black, & Rouch, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
173 ISDA, Eurozone Contingency Planning, available online at: http://www2.isda.org/functional-areas/legal-and-documentation/eurozone-contingency-planning/ (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar