Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:52:25.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Sense of Déjà Vu? The FCC's Preliminary European Stability Mechanism Verdict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Susanne K. Schmidt

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the summer of 2012, the pending verdict of the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) was a topic of much speculation not only in Germany and in the European Union (EU), but also on the international level. Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was quoted as threatening to leave a meeting, were she to hear again “Bundesverfassungsgericht.” That decisions of a German non-majoritarian institution have such transnational repercussions while being guided by German laws and national considerations is nothing new. The Bundesbank's D-Mark rule was comparable and effectively pushed the introduction of the euro along. But also previous landmark rulings of the FCC on European integration raised cross-border attention, given that the Constitutional Court has the final say on German politics, and the biggest member state and economy of the EU can hardly be ignored. Moreover, being one of the most powerful constitutional courts in Europe, and certainly the one whose judgments receive most attention, rulings of the FCC are not only often cited but may also serve as a role model for other constitutional courts. Protest coming from this angle may therefore multiply.

Type
Special Section: The ESM Before the Courts
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 1: Special section - The ESM Before the Courts , 01 January 2013 , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Medick, Veit & Wittrock, Philipp, Karlsruhe lässt Kanzlerin zappeln, Der Spiegel, July 16, 2012, available at http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/esm-und-fiskalpakt-bundesverfassungsgericht-laesst-sich-mit-euro-urteil-zeit-a-844573.html.Google Scholar

2 Joerges, Christian, 'Deliberative Political Processes’ Revisited: What Have We Learnt About the Legitimacy of Supranational Decision-Making, 44 J. Common Mkt. Studs. 779–802 (2006) (arguing that the CJEU can compensate for forcing member states to consider the effects of their policies on other member states).Google Scholar

3 Keohane, Robert O., Reciprocity in International Relations, 40 Int'l Org. 1, 4f (1986).Google Scholar

4 See Rehder, Britta, What is Political About Jurisprudence? Courts, Politics and Political Science in Europe and the United States (Max Planck Inst. for the Study of Societies, Discussion Paper No. 07/5, 2006).Google Scholar

5 See Hönnige, Christoph & Gschwend, Thomas, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im politischen System der BRD—ein unbekanntes Wesen?, 51 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 507, 507–30 (2010).Google Scholar

6 See Alter, Karen, The European Court's Political Power: Selected Essays (2009); Alec Stone Sweet, The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance, 5 Living Revs. Eur. Governance 1, 1–50 (2010).Google Scholar

7 Sweet, Alec Stone, Judicialization and the Construction of Governance, 31 Comp. Pol. Studs. 147, 147–184 (1999).Google Scholar

8 See Vanberg, Georg, Establishing and Maintaining Judicial Independence, The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics 99–119 (2008); Ulrich Sieberer, Strategische Zurückhaltung von Verfassungsgerichten: Gewaltenteilungsvorstellungen und die Grenzen der Justizialisierung, 16 Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 1299, 1299–1323 (2006).Google Scholar

9 See Steinsdorff, Silvia von, Verfassungsgerichte als Demokratie-Versicherung? Ursachen und Grenzen der wachsenden Bedeutung juristischer Politikkontrolle, in Analyse Demokratischer Regierungssysteme, 479, 479–98 (Klemens H. Schrenk & Markus Soldner eds., 2010).Google Scholar

10 See Garrett, Geoffrey, The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union, 49 Int'l Org. 171, 171–181 (1995).Google Scholar

11 See Dyevre, Arthur, Unifying the Field of Comparative Judicial Politics: Towards a General Theory of Judicial Behaviour, 2 Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 297, 301, 311 (2010).Google Scholar

12 Kelemen, R. Daniel, The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU, 34 Comp. Pol. Studs. 622, 622 (2001).Google Scholar

13 See Kranenpohl, Uwe, Die Bedeutung von Interpretationsmethoden und Dogmatik in der Entscheidungspraxis des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, 48 Der Staat 387, 398 (2009).Google Scholar

14 See Sweet, Alec Stone, Rights Adjudication and Constitutional Pluralism in Germany and Europe, 19 J. Eur. Pub. Pol'y 92, 92 (2012).Google Scholar

15 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvL 52/71, May 29, 1974, 37 BVerfGE 271 (Ger.).Google Scholar

16 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 197/83, Oct. 22, 1986, 73 BVerfGE 339 (Ger.).Google Scholar

17 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2134/92, Oct. 12, 1993, 89 BVerfGE 155 (Ger.).Google Scholar

18 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2236/04, July 18, 2005, 113 BVerfGE 273 (Ger.).Google Scholar

19 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Jun. 30, 2009, 123 BVerfGE 267 (Ger.).Google Scholar

20 See Scharpf, Fritz W., The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity, 40 J. Common Mkt. Studs. 645, 645 (2002); Susanne K. Schmidt, Law-Making in the Shadow of Judicial Politics, in The “Community Method“: Obstinate or Obsolete? 43, 43 (Renaud Dehousse ed., 2011); Philipp Genschel & Markus Jachtenfuchs, How the European Union Constrains the State: Multilevel Governance of Taxation, 50 Eur. J. Pol. Res. 293, 293 (2011).Google Scholar

21 See Höpner, Martin et al., Kampf um Souveränität? Eine Kontroverse zur europäischen Integration nach dem Lissabon-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, 51 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 323, 347 (2012). Recently, the Czech constitutional court has declared a CJEU judgment ultra vires, motivated by an internal judicial conflict. See Jan Komárek, Czech Constitutional Court Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires; Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, 8 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 323, 323 (2012).Google Scholar

22 See Das Lissabon-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgericht: Auswege aus dem drohenden Justizkonflikt, Europa-Union Berlin, available at http://berlin.europa-union.de/fileadmin/files_eud/Appell_Vorlagepflicht_BVerfG.pdf.Google Scholar

23 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2661/06, July 6, 2010, 126 BVerfGE 286 (Ger.).Google Scholar

24 See Case C-144/04, Mangold v. Helm, 2005 E.C.R. I-9981.Google Scholar

25 It would have been difficult for the FCC to follow a more restrictive line on fundamental rights than the CJEU. See Stone Sweet, supra note 14, at 102.Google Scholar

26 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 2661/06, July 6, 2010, 126 BVerfGE 286 (Ger.).Google Scholar

27 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 50/98 (Ger.).Google Scholar

28 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 987/10, May 7, 2010, 125 BVerfGE 385 (Ger.).Google Scholar

29 See Temporary Injunction to Prevent Giving of Guarantee for Loans to Greece is Not Issued, Bundesverfassungsgericht, available at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/en/press/bvg10-030en.html [hereinafter Temporary Injunction].Google Scholar

30 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 1099/10, Jun. 9, 2010, 126 BVerfGE 158 (Ger.).Google Scholar

31 See Temporary Injunction, supra note 29.Google Scholar

32 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvR 987/10, May 7, 2010, 125 BVerfGE 385 (Ger.); see also Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, Parliaments—Fig Leaf or Heartbeat of Democracy? German Federal Constitutional Court Judgment of 7 September 2011, Euro Rescue Package, 8 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 304, 304 (2012); Sebastian Recker, Casenote—Euro Rescue Package Case: The German Federal Constitutional Court Protects the Principle of Parliamentary Budget, 12 German L.J. 2071, 2071 (2011).Google Scholar

33 Constitutional Complaints Lodged Against Aid Measures for Greece and Against the Euro Rescue Package Unsuccessful—No Violation of the Bundestag's Budget Autonomy, Bundesverfassungsgericht, available at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg11-055en.html [hereinafter Constitutional Complaints].Google Scholar

34 See id. Google Scholar

35 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvE 8/11, Feb. 28, 2012 (Ger.).Google Scholar

36 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvE 4/11, Jun. 19, 2012 (Ger.).Google Scholar

37 See Successful Application in Organstreit proceedings Regarding the ‘ESM/Euro Plus Pact,’ Bundesverfassungsgericht, available at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/en/press/bvg12-042en.html [hereinafter Successful Application].Google Scholar

38 See id. Google Scholar

39 Only “extracts” of the ruling are translated, which also have a different numbering than the German version. See Extracts from the Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 12 September 2012, Bundesverfassungsgericht, available at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/en/decisions/rs20120912_2bvr139012en.html [hereinafter Extracts from the Decision].Google Scholar

40 See id. at no. 163.Google Scholar

41 See id. at no. 165.Google Scholar

42 See Karlsruhe billigt ESM und stellt Bedingungen, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Sept. 13, 2012.Google Scholar

43 See Extracts from the Decision, supra note 39, at no. 220.Google Scholar

44 See id. at no. 198.Google Scholar

45 See id. at no. 210.Google Scholar

46 See id. at no. 228.Google Scholar

47 See id. at no. 245.Google Scholar

48 See Hertling, James, German Judges Reject Monti Bid for Rescue-Fund Bank License, Bloomberg, Sept. 12, 2012, available at http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-12/german-judges-reject-monti-bid-for-rescue-fund-bank-license.Google Scholar

49 See Steinbeis, Max, ESM/Fiskalpakt in Karlsruhe, Teil 2: Parlamentarier und ihre Verantwortung, (2012), available at http://verfassungsblog.de/esmfiskalpakt-karlsruhe-teil-2-parlamentarier-und-ihre-verantwortung/.Google Scholar

50 See Ferdinand Knauß & Rahmann, Tim, Der Glaubenskrieg der Ökonomen, Wirtschaftswoche (2012), available at http://www.wiwo.de/politik/konjunktur/professorenstreit-der-glaubenskrieg-der-oekonomen/6872348.html.Google Scholar

51 See Anke, Hassel & Schelkle, Waltraud, Hier spricht man deutsch, Berliner Republik (2011), available at http://www.b-republik.de/archiv/hier-spricht-man-deutsch; Inside the Winter 2012 EUSA Review, European Union Studies Association, available at http://www.eustudies.org/files/eusa_review/winter_12final.pdf.Google Scholar

52 See Wishart, Ian, ECB Unveils Bond-Buying Plan, EuropeanVoice.com, available at http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2012/september/ecb-unveils-bond-buying-plan-/75090.aspx.Google Scholar

53 See Case C-370/12, Pringle v. Ireland, 2012.Google Scholar

54 See ESM, German Constitutional Court, Passing the Hat onto Ireland, NewEurope, available at http://www.neurope.eu/article/esm-german-constitutional-court-passing-hat-ireland.Google Scholar

55 See Constitutional Judgement 3–4-1-6-12, Supreme Court: Republic of Estonia, available at http://www.riigikohus.ee/?id=1347; Decision No. 2012–653 DC of 9 August 2012, Conseil Constitutionnel, available at http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/english/case-law/decision/decision-no-2012-653-dc-of-9-august-2012.115501.html.Google Scholar

56 See Halberstam, Daniel & Möllers, Christoph, The German Constitutional Court Says “Ja zu Deutschland!”, 10 German L.J. 1241, 1241 (2009); Höpner, supra note 21; Robert C. Van Ooyen, Eine “europafeindliche” Kontinuität? Zum Politikverständnis der Lissabon-Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, 4 Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 26, 26 (2009).Google Scholar

57 Höpner, Martin & Rödl, Florian, Illegitim und rechtswidrig: Das neue makroökonomische Regime im Euroraum, 92 Wirtschaftsdienst 219, 219 (2012); Fritz W. Scharpf, Legitimacy Intermediation in the Multilevel European Polity and its Collapse in the Euro Crisis (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Discussion Paper No. 12/6, 2012).Google Scholar

58 See Scharpf, , supra note 57, at 30.Google Scholar

59 See Majone, Giandomenico, Europe's ‘Democratic Deficit': The Question of Standards, 4 European Law Journal 5, 5 (1998).Google Scholar

60 See Scharpf, Fritz W., Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity, 1 Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 173, 173 (2009).Google Scholar

61 See id. at 180. Google Scholar

62 See Scharpf, , supra note 20, at 25.Google Scholar

63 See Majone, Giandomenico, Has Integration Gone Too Far—or Not Far Enough? Rethinking the Union of Europe After the Crisis of Monetary Union (2012) (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

64 See Kabinett soll Vorbehaltserklärung zum ESM erhalten, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Sept. 21, 2012.Google Scholar

65 See Streit über richtigen Kurs in der Euro-Krise, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Aug. 6, 2012.Google Scholar

66 See Sabel, Charles F. & Zeitlin, Jonathan, Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union, 14 Eur. L. J. 271, 271 (2008).Google Scholar

67 See Amartya, Sen, The Idea of Justice (2009).Google Scholar

68 The Myth of the Periphery, The Economist, Mar. 25, 2012, available at http://www.economist.com/node/15769602.Google Scholar

69 See Enderlein, Henrik, Laura Müller & Christoph Trebesch, Democracies Default Differently: Regime Type and Debt Crisis Resolution (unpublished manuscript), available at http://www.sfb-governance.de/teilprojekte/projekte_phase_1/projektbereich_d/d4/DDD_Enderlein_et_al.pdf?1277900047.Google Scholar

70 See Obinger, Herbert, Die Finanzkrise und die Zukunft des Wohlfahrtsstaates, 40 Leviathan 441, 441 (2012).Google Scholar

71 See Streeck, Wolfgang & Mertens, Daniel, Fiscal Austerity and Public Investment: Is the Possible the Enemy of the Necessary? (Max Planck Inst. for the Study of Societies, Discussion Paper No. 11/12, 2011).Google Scholar

72 See Ungern-Sternberg, von, supra note 32, at 311.Google Scholar

73 See Fligstein, Neil, Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe (2009).Google Scholar

74 Keohane, , supra note 3, at 20.Google Scholar