Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:33:29.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persuasive Authority Beyond the State: A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility Norms as Legal Reasons Within Positive Legal Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Michael Torrance

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The practice of law has been challenged by the promulgation of transnational norms associated with “corporate social responsibility” (“CSR”), arising beyond the State, with little or no connection to traditional sources of positive law. These phenomena, which we will refer to as “transnational CSR norms,” are increasingly important guides to behaviour for corporate actors, despite the fact that adherence to such norms is not “required” by positive legal systems. Perhaps for this reason, transnational CSR norms are typically poorly understood and possibly underutilized in the practice of law. The purpose of this paper will be to determine, by recourse to legal theory, whether, and if so how, transnational CSR norms may be related to positive legal systems, and therefore to the practice of law. In so doing, we will seek to develop a theoretical understanding of the role transnational CSR norms can, do, and ought to play within processes of legal reasoning, particularly from the theoretical starting points offered by analytical/ positivist, and discursive theories of law.

Type
Articles
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 8 , 01 August 2011 , pp. 1573 - 1636
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Including but not limited to international standards of environmental performance, human rights, health and safety, employment/labour relations, and community and aboriginal relations, created and implemented by private actors without the direct involvement of the State. This definition will be elaborated upon below.Google Scholar

2 Remi Clavet, Governance, International Law & Corporate Social Responsibility, in International Institute for Labour Studies 1 (2008).Google Scholar

3 Id. Google Scholar

4 Id. Google Scholar

5 Duplessis, Isabelle, Soft International Labour Law: The Preferred Method of Regulation in a Decentralized Society, in Governance, International Law & Corporate Social Responsibility 7, 12 (2008).Google Scholar

6 Id. at 27.Google Scholar

7 Keith Culver & Michael Giudice, Legality's Borders xvi (2010).Google Scholar

8 Id. at xx.Google Scholar

9 Id. at xxiv.Google Scholar

10 Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms 150-154 (1999); Culver, & Giudice, , supra note 7, at xxx.Google Scholar

11 Joseph Raz, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System 212 (1970) [hereinafter Raz, Concept].Google Scholar

12 Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law 63, 153 (1979) [hereinafter Raz, Authority].Google Scholar

13 Id. at 99.Google Scholar

14 Id. at 153.Google Scholar

15 Id. at 63.Google Scholar

16 Id. at 148.Google Scholar

17 Meidinger, Errol, Multi-Interest Self Governance through Global Product Certification Programmes, in Responsible Business: Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions (Olaf Dilling et al. eds., 2008).Google Scholar

18 Porter, Tony & Ronit, Karston, Self-Regulation as Policy Process: The Multiple and Criss-Crossing Stages of Private Rule-Making, 39 Pol'y Sci. 41–72 (2006).Google Scholar

19 Olaf Dilling, Herberg, Martin & Winter, Gerd, Private Accountability in a Globalising World, in Responsible Business: Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions 4 (Olaf Dilling et al. eds., 2008) [hereinafter Dilling et al., Private Accountability].Google Scholar

20 Culver, & Giudice, , supra note 7.Google Scholar

21 Michael Kerr, Richard Janda & Chip Pitts, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Legal Analysis (2009); Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 3.Google Scholar

22 Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 2.Google Scholar

23 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

24 Id. Google Scholar

25 Clavet, supra note 2.Google Scholar

26 Private Accountability, supra note 19.Google Scholar

27 Id. Google Scholar

28 Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer, Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework, 66 J. Bus. Ethics 71 (2006).Google Scholar

29 Porter, & Ronit, , supra note 18.Google Scholar

30 Black, Julia, The Development of the Global Markets as Rule-Makers: Engagement and Legitimacy, in Law and Financial Markets Review 218 (2008) [hereinafter Black, Development].Google Scholar

31 Id. at 218.Google Scholar

32 Palazzo & Scherer, supra note 28.Google Scholar

33 Black, Development, supra note 30, at 225.Google Scholar

34 Black, Julia, Legitimacy and the Competition for Regulatory Share, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Thesis no. 6/2009, 2 [hereinafter Legitimacy].Google Scholar

35 Id. at 19.Google Scholar

36 Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 5.Google Scholar

37 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

38 Id. Google Scholar

39 Peer Zumbansen, The Evolution of the Corporation: Organization, Finance, Knowledge and Corporate Social Responsibility, 5 CLPE Research Thesis 1, no. 6/2009.Google Scholar

40 Id. Google Scholar

41 Scott, Colin, Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State, in The Politics of Regulation 145 (Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur eds., 2003) [hereinafter Scott, Regulation].Google Scholar

42 Kerr, Janda & Pitts, supra note 21; Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19.Google Scholar

43 Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 3.Google Scholar

44 Scott, Colin, Reflexive Governance, Meta-Regulation and Corporate Social Responsibility: the “Heineken Effect,” in Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility 182 (Nina Boeger et al. eds., 2008) [hereinafter Scott, Reflexive Governance]; Kerr, Janda & Pitts, supra note 21.Google Scholar

45 Reflexive Governance, supra note 44, at 181; Parker, Christine E., Meta-Regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility, in The New Corporate Accountability and the Law (Doreen McBarnet, Aurora Voiculescu & Tom Campbell eds., forthcoming).Google Scholar

46 Zumbansen, Peer, Transnational Law, in Encyclopedia of Comparative Law 738–54 (Jan Smits ed., 2006).Google Scholar

47 Id. Google Scholar

48 Id. Google Scholar

49 Scott, Regulation, supra note 41.Google Scholar

50 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 42.Google Scholar

51 Id. at 43.Google Scholar

52 Kahler, Miles & Lake, David A., Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, 37 Pol. Sci. & Pol. 409–14 (2004).Google Scholar

53 Arendt, Hannah, What is Authority?, in The Portable Hannah Arendt (2000); Bruce Lincoln, Authority: Construction and Corrosion (1994).Google Scholar

54 Lincoln, supra note 53, at 4.Google Scholar

55 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

56 Id. at 1, 11.Google Scholar

57 Sinclair, Timothy J., The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness 63 (2005).Google Scholar

58 Id. at 65.Google Scholar

59 Id. at 85.Google Scholar

60 Id. at 66.Google Scholar

61 Id. Google Scholar

62 Hallstrom, Kristina Tamm, Organizing International Standardization: ISO and the IASC in Quest of Authority 34 (2004).Google Scholar

63 Id. Google Scholar

64 Id. at 35.Google Scholar

65 Scott, Regulation, supra note 41.Google Scholar

66 Sinclair, supra note 57, at 67.Google Scholar

67 Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1155, 1178 (2007).Google Scholar

68 Berman, Paul Schiff, A Pluralist Approach to International Law, 32 Yale J. Int'l L. 301, 327 (2007).Google Scholar

69 Hallstrom, supra note 62.Google Scholar

70 Maximillan Weber, Theory of Social and Economic Organization (A. R. Anderson & Talcott Parsons trans., 1947).Google Scholar

71 Hallstrom, supra note 62, at 37.Google Scholar

72 Id. Google Scholar

73 Id. Google Scholar

74 John Boli and George M. Thomas, Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875, 273 (1999).Google Scholar

75 Id. at 279.Google Scholar

76 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 63, 153.Google Scholar

77 Id. Google Scholar

78 Id. at 88.Google Scholar

79 Id. at 107.Google Scholar

80 Id. Google Scholar

81 Id. at 89.Google Scholar

82 Id. at 113.Google Scholar

83 Id. at 114.Google Scholar

84 Id. at 93.Google Scholar

85 Id. at 97.Google Scholar

86 Id. at 112.Google Scholar

87 Id. Google Scholar

88 Id. at 89.Google Scholar

89 Id. at 112.Google Scholar

90 Id. Google Scholar

91 Id. at 108.Google Scholar

92 Id. at 110.Google Scholar

93 Id. Google Scholar

94 Id. at 51.Google Scholar

95 Id. at 144.Google Scholar

96 Id. at 62.Google Scholar

97 Id. Google Scholar

98 Id. at 14.Google Scholar

99 Id. at 17.Google Scholar

100 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

101 Id. Google Scholar

102 Id. at 22.Google Scholar

103 Id. at 51.Google Scholar

104 Id. at 204.Google Scholar

105 Id. at 219.Google Scholar

106 Id. at 52.Google Scholar

107 Id. at 63.Google Scholar

108 Id. at 147.Google Scholar

109 Id. at 48.Google Scholar

110 Id. at 42.Google Scholar

111 Id. at 48.Google Scholar

112 Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44; Scott, Regulation, supra note 41.Google Scholar

113 Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44; Scott, Regulation, supra note 41.Google Scholar

114 Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44; Scott, Regulation, supra note 41;.Google Scholar

115 Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 4.Google Scholar

116 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

117 IFC Sustainability – Environmental and Social Standards, International Finance Corporation, http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/Content/EnvSocStandards (last visited 17 Aug. 2011)Google Scholar

118 International Organization for Standardization, http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

119 Forest Stewardship Council, http://www.fsc.org/ (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

120 Meidinger, Errol E., Environmental Certification Programs and U.S. Environmental Law: Closer than You May Think, 31 Envt'l L. Rep. 10,162, 10,165, 10,167 (2001) [hereinafter Meidinger, Environmental].Google Scholar

121 Id. at 10,166.Google Scholar

122 Id. Google Scholar

123 See sources cited supra note 45.Google Scholar

124 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 149.Google Scholar

125 Id. at 150.Google Scholar

126 Id. Google Scholar

127 Id. Google Scholar

128 Id. at 101.Google Scholar

129 Id. Google Scholar

130 Id. Google Scholar

131 Id. at 119.Google Scholar

132 Id. Google Scholar

133 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,167.Google Scholar

134 Standards Council of Canada, Key Considerations in the Development and Use of Standards in Legislative Instruments: Understanding the Partnership of the Regulatory and Voluntary Standards Systems 3 § 3.3 (2006); see Stepan Wood & Lynn Johannson, Six Principles for Integrating Non-Governmental Environmental Standards into Smart Regulation, 46 Osgoode Hall L.J. 345, 364 (2008).Google Scholar

135 Wood, & Johannson, , supra note 134, at 371.Google Scholar

136 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,170.Google Scholar

137 Technical Barriers to Trade, WTO Legal Texts (1994), http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/legal_e.htm (last visited 17 Aug. 2011); Stepan Wood, Green Revolution or Greenwash? Voluntary Environmental Standards, Public Law, and Private Authority in Canada, in New Perspectives on the Public-Private Divide 131 (Law Commission of Canada ed., 2003).Google Scholar

138 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,169.Google Scholar

139 Such as the United States National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 3701 (1996) (requiring the agencies it governs to utilize voluntary standards unless doing so would be “inconsistent with law or otherwise impractical”); see Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,170.Google Scholar

140 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,170.Google Scholar

141 Id. at 10,166.Google Scholar

142 Id. at 10,175; Wood, supra note 137, at 133.Google Scholar

143 Terms and conditions governing the appointment of a special adviser to the Minister of International Trade, to be known as the Extractive Sector Corporate Social Responsibility Counsellor, who may be appointed by the Governor in Council under the Public Service Employment Act, P.C. 2009–0422 ¶ 127.1(1)(c) (2009).Google Scholar

144 IFC Sustainability—Environmental and Social Standards, International Finance Corporation, http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/Content/EnvSocStandards (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

145 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, http://www.voluntaryprinciples.org/principles/index.php (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

146 Reporting Framework, Global Reporting Initiative, http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/ (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

147 CSR Counsellor Mandate, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (21 Apr. 2011), http://www.international.gc.ca/csr_counsellor-conseiller_rse/mandate-mandat.aspx?menu_id=57&menu=L.Google Scholar

148 Id. Google Scholar

149 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,168.Google Scholar

150 Wood, supra note 137, at 52.Google Scholar

151 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,171.Google Scholar

152 Id. at 10,172.Google Scholar

153 Webb, Kernaghan & Morrison, Andrew, The Law and Voluntary Codes: Examining the ‘Tangled Web,’ in Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation 125 (Kernaghan Webb ed., 2004); Wood, supra note 137, at 135.Google Scholar

154 Meidinger, Environmental, supra note 120, at 10,171.Google Scholar

155 107 P.L. 204, 116 Stat. 745, 15 U.S.C.S. § 7201 (2010).Google Scholar

156 Webb, & Morrison, , supra note 153, at 147.Google Scholar

157 Parker, supra note 45.Google Scholar

158 Id. at 178.Google Scholar

159 Id. at 182.Google Scholar

160 Id. at 139.Google Scholar

161 Duplessis, supra note 5, at 27.Google Scholar

162 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 49.Google Scholar

163 Id. at 50.Google Scholar

164 Id. at 70, 71.Google Scholar

165 Teubner, Gunther, The King's Many Bodies: The Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy, 31 Law & Soc'y Rev. 763, 768 (1997).Google Scholar

166 Parker, supra note 45; Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44, at 176.Google Scholar

167 Parker, supra note 45; Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44, at 176.Google Scholar

168 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 115.Google Scholar

169 Id. at 120.Google Scholar

170 Id. at 97.Google Scholar

171 Culver, & Giudice, , supra note 7, at 61.Google Scholar

172 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 51.Google Scholar

173 Id. at 62, 80.Google Scholar

174 Id. at 59.Google Scholar

175 Id. at 97.Google Scholar

176 Culver, & Giudice, , supra note 7, at 64.Google Scholar

177 Id. at 65.Google Scholar

178 Teubner, supra note 165.Google Scholar

179 Similar conclusions were drawn in Culver & Giudice, supra note 7, at 115.Google Scholar

180 Id. at 146.Google Scholar

181 Theodor Viehweg, Topics and Law 19 (Peter Lang ed., W. Cole Durham, Jr. trans., 5th ed. 1993).Google Scholar

182 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

183 Friedrich V. Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, And Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs 219 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

184 Id. at 38.Google Scholar

185 Id. at 42.Google Scholar

186 Id. at 247.Google Scholar

187 Id. Google Scholar

188 Id. at 186.Google Scholar

189 Id. at 33.Google Scholar

190 Id. at 34.Google Scholar

191 Id. at 34.Google Scholar

192 Id. at 33.Google Scholar

193 A similar sociological premise was adopted in Dilling et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19, at 1.Google Scholar

194 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 24.Google Scholar

195 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

196 Id. at 25.Google Scholar

197 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

198 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

199 Id. at 181; Chaim Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation 8 (1969).Google Scholar

200 Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 55.Google Scholar

201 Id. at 55.Google Scholar

202 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 181.Google Scholar

203 Chaim Perelman, Justice, Law, and Argument: Essays on Moral and Legal Reasoning 77 (1980).Google Scholar

204 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 181.Google Scholar

205 Id. Google Scholar

206 Id. at 36, 181.Google Scholar

207 Id. at 36.Google Scholar

208 Perelman, supra note 203.Google Scholar

209 Viehweg, supra note 181, at 65.Google Scholar

210 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 53.Google Scholar

211 Viehweg, supra note 181, at 102–07.Google Scholar

212 Perelman, supra note 203, at 160; Wordnet, Princeton, http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=praxis (last visited 17 Aug. 2011).Google Scholar

213 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 200, at 58.Google Scholar

214 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 32; Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 310.Google Scholar

215 Perelman, supra note 203, at 122.Google Scholar

216 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 45.Google Scholar

217 Id. at 61.Google Scholar

218 Perelman, supra note 203, at 130.Google Scholar

219 Id. at 122.Google Scholar

220 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 213.Google Scholar

221 Id. at 205.Google Scholar

222 Id. at 35.Google Scholar

223 Id. at 213.Google Scholar

224 Id. at 36.Google Scholar

225 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 62.Google Scholar

226 Viehweg, supra note 181, at 27; id. at 38.Google Scholar

227 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 37–38.Google Scholar

228 Viehweg, supra note 181, at 41.Google Scholar

229 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 205, 208.Google Scholar

230 Perelman, supra note 203, at 120.Google Scholar

231 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 212.Google Scholar

232 Id. at 183.Google Scholar

233 Perelman, supra note 203, at 128, 129.Google Scholar

234 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 228.Google Scholar

235 Perelman, supra note 203, at 122.Google Scholar

236 Id. Google Scholar

237 Id. at 120.Google Scholar

238 Id. Google Scholar

239 Id. at 123.Google Scholar

240 Id. at 132.Google Scholar

241 Id. at 139.Google Scholar

242 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 210.Google Scholar

243 Id. at 209.Google Scholar

244 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 4.Google Scholar

245 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 204.Google Scholar

246 Levit, Janet Koven, Bottom-Up International Lawmaking: Reflections on the New Haven School of International Law, 32 Yale J. Int'l. L. 393, 415 (2007).Google Scholar

247 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 193.Google Scholar

248 Id. at 186.Google Scholar

249 Id. at 40.Google Scholar

250 Id. at 40.Google Scholar

251 Kratochwil, supra note 183, at 40; Perelman, supra note 203, at 129.Google Scholar

252 Viehweg, supra note 181, at 41.Google Scholar

253 Id. Google Scholar

254 Scott, supra note 41; Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44.Google Scholar

255 Private Accountability, supra note 19; Kerr, Janda & Pitts, supra note 21.Google Scholar

256 Scott, Reflexive Governance, supra note 44; Scott, Regulation, supra note 41.Google Scholar

257 Perelman, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, supra note 199, at 309.Google Scholar

258 Raz, Authority, supra note 12, at 43.Google Scholar

259 Lincoln, supra note 53.Google Scholar

260 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

261 Id. Google Scholar

262 Sinclair, supra note 57, at 63.Google Scholar

263 Id. at 66.Google Scholar

264 Id. Google Scholar

265 Hallstrom, supra note 62, at 35.Google Scholar

266 Palazzo, & Scherer, , supra note 28.Google Scholar

267 Id. Google Scholar

268 Black, supra note 30, at 225.Google Scholar

269 Weber, supra note 70.Google Scholar

270 Dilling, et al., Private Accountability, supra note 19.Google Scholar

271 Zumbansen, supra note 39.Google Scholar