Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:00:36.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“In the Glass Darkly”: Legacies of Nazi and Fascist Law in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Mayo Moran

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special issue - European Integration in the Shadow of Europe's Darker Pasts: The “Darker Legacies of Law in Europe” revisited , 01 February 2006 , pp. 205 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Augustìn José Menéndez, From Republicanism to Fascist Ideology under the Early Franquismo, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 337, 360 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

2 Stolleis, Michael, Prologue: Reluctance to Glance in the Mirror. The Changing Face of German Jurisprudence after 1933 and post-1945, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 1, 16 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

3 Brunner v. European Union Treaty, 75 COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW (1994).Google Scholar

4 Weiler, Joseph, Does Europe Need a Constitution?: Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision, 1 European Law Journal 219 (1995).Google Scholar

5 McCormick, John P, Carl Schmitt's Europe: Cultural, Imperial and Spatial, Proposals for European Integration, 1923-1955, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 133, 141 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003), quoting Jurgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (C. Cronin & P. de Greiff eds., 1998); Jurgen Habermas, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, (Max Pensky ed., 2001).Google Scholar

6 Phillip Pettit, A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency (2001).Google Scholar

7 Joerges, Christian, Europe as Großraum? Shifting Legal Conceptualizations of the Integration Project, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 167, 187 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

8 Walker, Neil, From Großraum to Condominium – A Comment, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 193, 200 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

9 Mack v. Canada A.G. 6 O.R. (3d) 2002, 737 (Ont. C.A.)Google Scholar

10 This invocation of democracy was despite the evidence before the Court of Appeal that the franchise at the time of the relevant laws was severely restricted on race and gender lines and, in particular, excluded Chinese-Canadian citizens from the right to vote. Appellant's Factum, Ontario Court of Appeal, at para. 108-9, citing Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, History of the Vote, and Cummingham v. Tomey Homma A.C. 1903, 151 (P.C.), available at http://www.utoronto.ca/documents/conferences/reparations_mack-appellantsfactum.pdf.Google Scholar

11 Lustgarten, Laurence, 'A Distorted Image of Ourselves': Nazism, ‘Liberal’ Societies and the Qualities of Difference, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 113, 113 (Christian Joerges, Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

12 Curran, Vivian Grosswald, Formalism and Anti-Formalism in French and German Judicial Methodology, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 205, 205 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

13 Curran, Vivian Grosswald, Formalism and Anti-Formalism in French and German Judicial Methodology, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 205, 205 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

14 Mahlmann, Matthias, Judicial Methodology and Fascist and Nazi Law, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 229, 232 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

15 Mahlmann, Matthias, Judicial Methodology and Fascist and Nazi Law, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 229, 232 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

16 Whitman, James Q, On Nazi ‘Honour’ and the New European ‘Dignity’, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe 243, 258 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

17 Whitman, James Q, On Nazi ‘Honour’ and the New European ‘Dignity’, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 265 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

18 Whitman, James Q, On Nazi ‘Honour’ and the New European ‘Dignity’, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 266 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

19 Neuman, Gerald L., On Fascist Honour and Human Dignity: A Sceptical Response, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 267, (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

20 Neuman, Gerald L., On Fascist Honour and Human Dignity: A Sceptical Response, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 268 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

21 Neuman, Gerald L., On Fascist Honour and Human Dignity: A Sceptical Response, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe, 269 (Christian Joerges/Navraj Singh Galeigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar