Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:44:06.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EU Law, Politics, and the Social Question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Floris de Witte

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This contribution analyzes how the process of European integration has affected the capacity of citizens to collectively decide on the “social question,” that is, on the distribution of resources and life chances between individuals in a society. It starts by highlighting the pivotal role of “the political” in any answer to such question (B); generally traces the demise of this role under the pressures of globalization, legal integration, and the sovereign debt crisis (C); and suggests that law has been an important instrument for the lifting of the social question outside the scope of political contestation. This contribution then briefly catalogues different alternatives that can serve to reappropriate the social question within the realm of politics, argues that our priority should lie in the formation of a transnational public sphere, and suggests that EU law can, in several ways, contribute towards, if not fully deliver, a return of authorship and ownership about how societies function to the citizen (D).

Type
Special Issue - Regeneration Europe
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 5: Special issue - Regeneration Europe , 01 May 2013 , pp. 581 - 611
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Hartmann, Moritz & Witte, Floris de, Ending the Honeymoon (in this issue), and also regenerationeurope.euGoogle Scholar

2 See Foucault, Michel, The Birth of Bio-politics: Lectures at the College of France (2010) (discussing the inversion in the relationship between economy and politics).Google Scholar

3 See Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union art. 2–3, Mar. 3, 2010, 2010 O.J. (C 83) 17 [hereinafter TEU post-Lisbon].Google Scholar

4 Somek, Alexander, The Social Question in a Transnational Context, in LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series 5 (2011).Google Scholar

5 Streeck, Wolfgang, Taking Capitalism Seriously: Towards an Institutionalist Approach to Contemporary Political Economy, 9 Socio-Econ. Rev. 137 (2011).Google Scholar

6 Scharpf, Fritz, Legitimacy in the Multi-Level European Polity, in The Twilight of Constitutionalism? 89 (Martin Loughlin & Petra Dobner eds., 2010).Google Scholar

7 Somek, , supra note 4, at 26.Google Scholar

8 See also Somek, Alexander, What Is Political Union? (in this issue).Google Scholar

9 Mazower, Mark, What Remains: On the European Union, 147 The Nation 2 (2012).Google Scholar

10 Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation 136–140 (2002).Google Scholar

11 Streeck, , supra note 5, at 138.Google Scholar

12 Sassen, Saskia, Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (2006).Google Scholar

13 Streeck, Wolfgang, The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism, 71 New Left Rev. 5, 10 (2011).Google Scholar

14 Unger, Roberto, The Left Alternative 31 (2009).Google Scholar

15 Streeck, , supra note 13, at 7.Google Scholar

16 Habermas, Jürgen, The Crisis of the European Union 103 (2012).Google Scholar

17 See Somek, , supra note 4, at 17. (noting, somewhat more cynically, stable access to “games, porn and drugs” which the underclass may use in order to numb their misery).Google Scholar

18 See also Moravcsik, Andrew & Sangiovanni, Andrea, On Democracy and “Public Interest” in the European Union, in Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie: Innovationen und Blockaden 122, 130 (Wolfgang Streeck & Renate Mayntz eds., 2003).Google Scholar

19 E.g., Greece and the Euro: Papandreou's People, Economist, Nov. 5, 2011, http://www.economist.com/node/21536667.Google Scholar

20 Halberstam, Michael, Totalitarianism and the Modern Conception of Politics 17 (1999).Google Scholar

21 Pierson, Paul, Coping with Permanent Austerity, 43 Revue française de sociologie 369, 370 (2002).Google Scholar

22 See, e.g., Glyn, Andrew, Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization and Welfare (2007).Google Scholar

23 E.g., Fontanella-Khan, James & Giles, Chris, Britain challenges EU over Tobin-tax, Fin. Times, Apr. 19, 2013, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/08322fa0-a913-11e2-a096-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2T7fr8Hxr.Google Scholar

24 Consider, alternatively, the case of Bernard Arnault. Arnault, France's richest man, who, upon the announcement of the Hollande government that citizens earning more than €1 million/year would be (temporarily) taxed up to 75%, decided to apply for Belgian citizenship, which would exempt him from the tax and bring millions to the Belgian treasury. The ease of regulatory mobility, including tax regimes and company structures, allows individuals to pick a regime most favorable, not only withdrawing their resources from their home state, but also creating a strong regulatory pull in favor of capital in both France and Belgium. The more “anti-capital” a social answer, the stronger this pull becomes.Google Scholar

25 Francesco Parisi, Norbert Schulz & Klick, Jonathan, Two Dimensions of Regulatory Competition, 26 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 55, 56 (2006).Google Scholar

26 Id. Google Scholar

27 Habermas, Jürgen, The Crisis of the European Union in the Light of a Constitutionalization of International Law, 23 Eur. J. of Int'l L. 335, 338 (2012); David Held & Anthony McGrew, The Global Transformation Reader (2000).Google Scholar

28 See Nicol, Danny, The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism 47–127 (2010).Google Scholar

29 Unger, , supra note 14, at 133.Google Scholar

30 Maduro, Miguel Poiares, A New Governance for the European Union and the Euro: Democracy and Justice 14 (2012); Dani Rodrik, The Globalisation Paradox—Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (2011).Google Scholar

31 Saydé, Alexandre, One Law, Two Competitions: An Enquiry into the Contradictions of Free Movement Law, 13 Cambridge Y.B. Eur. Legal Stud. 365, 370 (2011).Google Scholar

32 Scharpf, Fritz, The Asymmetry of European Integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘Social Market Economy,’ 8 Socio-econ. Rev. 211, 217 (2010).Google Scholar

33 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG - Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 2 BvE 2/08, June 30, 2009 [hereinafter Lisbon ruling] (noting all the different ways in which it does not).Google Scholar

34 Scharpf, Fritz, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic 43–83 (1999).Google Scholar

35 See Case C-438/05, Int'l Transp. Workers’ Fed'n v. Viking Line ABP, 2007 E.C.R. I-10779; Case C-173/09, Elchinov Georgi Ivanov Elchinov v. Natsionalna zdravnoosiguritelna kasa, 2010 E.C.R. I-08889; Case C-73/08, Bressol et al v. Gouvernement de la Communauté française, 2010 E.C.R. I-2735.Google Scholar

36 See Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect, 107 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1 (2012).Google Scholar

37 Dawson, Mark & Witte, Floris de, Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-crisis, 76 Mod. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2013).Google Scholar

38 Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission and Greece on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality (Mar. 14, 2012), available at http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-your-country/ellada/index_en.htm.Google Scholar

39 Barry, Brian, What did we learn?, in Cultural diversity versus economic solidarity 357, 361 (Van Parijs ed., 2004).Google Scholar

40 Id. Google Scholar

41 See also Habermas, , supra note 16, at 4.Google Scholar

42 Dawson, & Witte, de, supra note 37.Google Scholar

43 Id. Google Scholar

44 Currently, , 23/27 Member States are under supervision under the excessive deficit procedure and 12/17 Eurozone states under the macro-economic imbalance procedure. See European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs, Excessive Deficit Procedure, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/index_en.htm (last visited May 12, 2013); see also European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs, Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/macroeconomic_imbalance_procedure/index_en.htm (last visited May 12, 2013).Google Scholar

45 Focus on Growth, Economist, Mar. 23, 2013, http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21574028-imf-delivers-unexpected-message-dutch-focus-growth.Google Scholar

46 Streeck, , supra note 13, at 26.Google Scholar

47 Simons, Stefon, Tough Words: Merkel and Sarkozy halt payments to Athens, Der Spiegel, Nov. 3, 2011, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/tough-words-merkel-and-sarkozy-halt-payments-to-athens-a-795638.html.Google Scholar

48 Ainger, Katharine, The Spanish public won't accept a financial coup d'etat, Guardian, Sept. 25, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/25/spain-public-financial-coup.Google Scholar

49 Dawson, & Witte, de, supra note 37.Google Scholar

50 Clearly, , Member States with a more solid economic surplus (e.g. Norway) may more easily withstand the economic pressures of globalization and the sovereign debt crisis. See Unger, supra note 14, at 37. Such economic buffers, however, appear to require the mobilization of national resources, including both savings and financial surpluses; mobilization which has become increasingly difficult since the crisis. Id. Google Scholar

51 Brunkhorst, Hauke, Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community 3 (2005).Google Scholar

52 Jiri Přibáň, The Self-Referential European Polity, its Legal Context and Systemic Differentiation: Theoretical Reflections on the Emergence of the EU's Political and Legal Autopoiesis, 15 Eur. L.J. 442, 442–461 (2009).Google Scholar

53 Id.; see also Sangiovanni, Andrea, Justice and the Priority of Politics over Morality, 16 J. of Pol. Phil. 137, 137–164 (2008).Google Scholar

54 Amartya, Sen, The Idea of Justice 227 (2009). See also James Griffin, On Human Rights 167 (2008).Google Scholar

55 See Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action II 178 (1987); see also Halberstam, supra note 20, at 17.Google Scholar

56 Hayek, Friedrich von, The Constitution of Liberty 184–85 (1978).Google Scholar

57 See Somek, , supra note 4, 10–12.Google Scholar

58 Nicol, , supra note 28.Google Scholar

59 See also Dale, Gareth & El-Enany, Nadine, The Limits of Social Europe: EU Law and the Ordoliberal Agenda (in this issue).Google Scholar

60 See Streeck, Wolfgang, Markets and Peoples, 73 New Left Rev. 63, 64 (2012).Google Scholar

61 Streeck, , supra note 60, at 65.Google Scholar

62 See Streeck, , supra note 13, at 22.Google Scholar

63 See Chalmers, Damian, The European Redistributive State and a European Law of Struggle, 18 Eur. L.J. 667, 667 (2012).Google Scholar

64 Consider the German Pirate Party, the Italian Party led by comedian Beppe Grillo, or the participation of Vladimir Franz in the Czech presidential election.Google Scholar

65 On the importance of the illusion of change in political agency, see Lea, Ypi, Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency 131 (2011).Google Scholar

66 Streeck, , supra note 13, at 26.Google Scholar

67 Unger, , supra note 14, at 39.Google Scholar

68 Habermas, , supra note 16, at 10. See also Streeck, supra note 13, at 26.Google Scholar

69 Ypi, , supra note 65, at 131.Google Scholar

70 Scharpf, , supra note 6, at 105.Google Scholar

71 See also Wilkinson, Michael, The Specter of Authoritarian Liberalism: Reflections on the Constitutional Crisis of the European Union (in this issue).Google Scholar

72 Ypi, , supra note 65, at 107.Google Scholar

73 Bradford, , supra note 36.Google Scholar

74 See Witte, Floris de, Transnational Solidarity and the Mediation of Conflicts of Justice in Europe, 18 Eur. L.J. 694, 694 (2012).Google Scholar

75 Haas, Ernst, The Uniting of Europe 16 (1958).Google Scholar

76 Favell, Adrian, Eurostars and Eurocities (2008).Google Scholar

77 Habermas, , supra note 16.Google Scholar

78 Id. Google Scholar

79 Witte, De, supra note 74, at 702.Google Scholar

80 The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention 38 (Ruud Koopmans & Paul Statham eds., 2010).Google Scholar

81 Habermas, , supra note 16, at 46.Google Scholar

82 See European Commission, Culture, Our Programmes and Actions, http://ec.europa.eu/culture/our-programmes-and-actions/ (detailing a list of current EU cultural programs) (last visited May 12, 2013).Google Scholar

83 Dougan, Michael, What Are We to Make of the Citizens’ Initiative?, 48 Common Mkt L. Rev. 1807, 1807–1848 (2011).Google Scholar

84 Chalmers makes a convincing case for the need to create a public law of struggle. See Chalmers, supra note 63.Google Scholar

85 Lisbon ruling, supra note 33, ¶ 251.Google Scholar

86 See also Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 218 (2010).Google Scholar

87 Final Report of the Future of Europe Group (Sept. 17, 2012) [hereinafter Final Report], available at http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/626338/publicationFile/171843/120918-Abschlussbericht-Zukunftsgruppe.pdf.Google Scholar

88 Verhofstadt, Guy & Cohn-Bendit, Daniel, For Europe!: Manifesto for a Post-National Revolution in Europe (2012).Google Scholar

89 Rompuy, Herman Van, Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union: Report by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy (Dec. 5, 2012), available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/focuson/crisis/documents/131201_en.pdf.Google Scholar

90 Case C-438/05, Int'l Transp. Workers’ Fed'n v. Viking Line ABP, 2007 E.C.R. I-10779.Google Scholar

91 Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v. Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, 2007 E.C.R. I-11767.Google Scholar

92 See, e.g., Zahn, Rebecca, The Viking and Laval cases in the Context of European Enlargement, 3 Web J. of Current Legal Issues (2008), available at http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2008/issue3/zahn3.html.Google Scholar

93 Jan-Werner Müller, Beyond Militant Democracy?, 73 New Left Rev. 44 (2012).Google Scholar

94 Id. Google Scholar

95 See also Somek, supra 8.Google Scholar

96 Final Report, supra note 87, at 3–4.Google Scholar

97 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

98 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

99 Id. at 7.Google Scholar

100 Müller, supra note 93, at 47.Google Scholar

101 See Charlemagne, The Euro Crisis: A Delicate Proposal, Economist, June 26, 2012, http://www.economist.com/blogs/charlemagne/2012/06/euro-crisis (last visited May 7, 2013).Google Scholar

102 Van Rompuy, supra note 89, at 3.Google Scholar

103 Id. Google Scholar

104 Id. Google Scholar

105 Id. Google Scholar

106 Id. Google Scholar

107 Id. Google Scholar

108 European Council: The President, Interim Report: Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union, (Oct. 12, 2012), available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/132809.pdf.Google Scholar

109 Communication from the Commission: A Blueprint for a Deep and Genuine Economic and Monetary Union: Launching a European Debate, COM (2012) 777 final (Nov. 28, 2012), available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0777:FIN:EN:PDF.Google Scholar

110 Maduro, , supra note 30.Google Scholar

111 Id. at 18.Google Scholar

112 Cf. Graeme Wearden, Europe's Day of Anti-Austerity Strikes and Protests Turn Violent: As It Happened, The Guardian, Nov. 14, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/nov/14/eurozone-crisis-general-strikes-protest-day-of-action (describing the European day of Action and Solidarity against Austerity, held on 14th November 2012, where workers were on strike in most EU Member States).Google Scholar

113 Maduro, , supra note 30. (appearing to assume that such choices are self-evident).Google Scholar

114 Verhofstadt, & Cohn-Bendit, supra note 88.Google Scholar

115 Id. at 17.Google Scholar

116 Id. at ch. 1.Google Scholar

117 Id. at ch. 3; but see Anthony Beevor, Europe's Long Shadow: Will a Continent Turn its Back on Democracy?, Prospect, Nov. 3, 2012, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/eurozone-democracy-antony-beevor/.Google Scholar

118 Verhofstadt, & Cohn-Bendit, supra note 88, at 17.Google Scholar

119 Id. at 69.Google Scholar

120 Id. at 60.Google Scholar

121 Bellamy, Richard, The Liberty of the Post-Moderns? Market and Civic Freedom Within the EU 17–18 (LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series No. 1/2009, 2009), available at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/europeaninstitute/leqs/leqspaper1.pdf.Google Scholar

122 Scharpf, Fritz, Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity, 1 Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 173, 173–204 (2009).Google Scholar

123 See id. § B; see also Agustín José Menéndez, The Existential Crisis of the European Union (in this issue).Google Scholar

124 Ferrera, Maurizio, The Boundaries of Welfare (2005); Floris de Witte, National Welfare as Transnational Justice?, in European Contract Law and the Welfare State 15 (Rutgers ed., 2012).Google Scholar

125 Saydé, supra note 31.Google Scholar

126 Id. at 374.Google Scholar

127 Id. at 375.Google Scholar

128 Id. at 377.Google Scholar

129 Deakin, Simon, Reflexive Harmonisation and European Company Law, 15 Eur. L.J. 224 (2009).Google Scholar

130 Witte, De, supra note 74.Google Scholar

131 Id. Google Scholar

132 Azoulai, Loic, The European Court of Justice and the Duty to Respect Sensitive National Interests, in Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice 167 (Mark Dawson, Bruno de Witte & Elise Muir eds., 2013).Google Scholar

133 Harbo, Tor-Inge, The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law, 16 Eur. L.J. 158 (2010).Google Scholar

134 See Case C-370/05, Festersen, 2007 E.C.R. I-1135; see also Case C-438/05, Int'l Transp. Workers’ Fed'n v. Viking Line ABP, 2007 E.C.R. I-10779; see also Harbo, supra note 133.Google Scholar

135 Streeck, Wolfgang, Citizenship Under Regime Competition: The Case of the “European Works Councils,” 1 Eur. Integration online papers 3, 5 (1997), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/1997-005.pdf.Google Scholar

136 Harbo, , supra note 133, at 166 (noting the distinction between proportionality as understood by Alexy and Habermas).Google Scholar

137 See Deakin, Simon & Barnard, Catherine, Market Access and Regulatory Competition, in The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises 197 (Catherine Barnard & Joanne Scott eds., 2002).Google Scholar

138 See Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union art. 4(2), May 9, 2008, 2008 O.J. (C 83) 18 [hereinafter TEU] (“the Union shall respect the equality of Member States … as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government.”).Google Scholar

139 See Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union art. 9, Sep. 5, 2008, 2008 O.J. (C 83) 53 (“the Union shall take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health.”).Google Scholar

140 The TEU refers to the objective of creating a “social market economy.” See TEU, supra note 138, at art 3(3).Google Scholar

141 See Case C-208/09, Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v. Landeshauptmann von Wien, 2010 E.C.R. I-13693, ¶ 83, 92; for a general discussion of the case law and the use of the constitutional identity clause see Bodgandy, Armin Van & Schill, Stephan, Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity Under the Lisbon Treaty, 48 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 1417, 1427–1430 (2011). Von Bogdandy and Schill indeed accept that the role of the constitutional identity clause is to strengthen the capacity of Member States to come up with diverse policy outcomes, even if they limit its scope of application in a formalistic and procedural fashion. Id. Google Scholar

142 See Case C-165/08, Comm'n v. Poland, 2009 E.C.R. I-6843, ¶ 52.Google Scholar

143 Lisbon ruling, supra note 33, ¶ 343; See also 14 German L.J. 1–190 (2013) (elaborating upon, in a special issue of the German Law Journal, the ESM decision).Google Scholar

144 Lisbon ruling, supra note 33, ¶ 358.Google Scholar

145 Id. ¶ 248–58.Google Scholar

146 Case C-515/08, Opinion of AG Villalon in Santos Palhota, 2010 E.C.R. I-9133, ¶ 52–53.Google Scholar

147 See also Case C-282/10, Maribel Dominguez v. Centre Informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la Région Centre, 2012 E.C.R. (forthcoming), ¶ 159 (Sept. 8, 2011), http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=109267&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1674620.Google Scholar

148 Case C-515/08, Santos Palhota, 2010 E.C.R. I-9133.Google Scholar