Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
As a system of managing environmental and social risk in the sector of large-scale international project finance, the Equator Principles (EPs) have generated increased interest and critical engagement in the private, public, and academic spheres. Particular research in the field of transnational governance is especially concerned with assessing the degree in which private and public actors are revolutionizing the methods and procedures of governance in the wake of the decline of the welfare state, and rise of the post-regulatory state. Social scientists and legal theorists alike have begun analyzing the effects of a shift in the “emphasis of control, to a greater or lesser degree, from traditional bureaucratic mechanisms towards instruments of regulation.” Within this context, the EPs present an opportunity to analyze and assess the structure, procedures and effectiveness of a self-regulatory governance system, voluntarily established by private actors in the international project finance sector, to mitigate social and environmental risks.
1 Scott, Colin, Regulation in the Age of Governance: the Rise of the Post Regulatory State, in The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance 145, 148 (Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur eds., 2004).Google Scholar
2 Conley, John & Williams, Cynthia, Global banks as Global Sustainability Regulators?: The Equator Principles, 33 L. & Pol'y 1, 2 (2011).Google Scholar
3 Id. at 5.Google Scholar
4 Equator Principles, “About the Equator Principles”, available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/index.php/about-ep (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
5 Principles, Equator, Equator Principles: A Financial Industry Benchmark for Determining, Assessing and Managing Social and Environmental Risk in Project Finance 1, 2-7 (2006), available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/index.php/the-eps-and-official-translations (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
6 Amalric, Franck, The Equator Principles: A Step Towards Sustainability?, 1 Center For Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Working Paper Series 1, 9 (2005).Google Scholar
7 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 2.Google Scholar
8 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 3.Google Scholar
9 Id. Google Scholar
10 Id. at 4.Google Scholar
11 Id. Google Scholar
12 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 4.Google Scholar
13 Bank Track, The Outside Job: Turning the Equator Principles Towards People and Planet 1, 8 (2011) available at: http://www.banktrack.org/download/the_outside_job/111021_the_outside_job_final.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
14 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 5.Google Scholar
15 Id.Google Scholar
16 Id.Google Scholar
17 Id.Google Scholar
18 Farrell, L. Michael, Principle-agency Risk in Project Finance, 21 Int'l. J. Proj. Mgmt. 547, 548 (2003).Google Scholar
19 Id. at 553.Google Scholar
20 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 5.Google Scholar
21 Id. at 6.Google Scholar
22 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 10.Google Scholar
23 IFC, International Finance Corporations Policy on Social & Environmental Sustainability, 2 (2006), available at: http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/sustainability.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/pol_SocEnvSustainability2006/$FILE/SustainabilityPolicy.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
24 Id. at 3.Google Scholar
25 Id. at 3-4.Google Scholar
26 IFC, supra note 23, at 1.Google Scholar
27 Id. at 5-6.Google Scholar
28 Esty, Benjamin & Megginson, William, Creditor Rights, Enforcement, and Debt Ownership Structure: evidence from the Global Syndicated Loan Market, 38 J. of Fin. Quant. 1, 4 (2003).Google Scholar
29 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 10.Google Scholar
30 Id. at 11.Google Scholar
31 Equator Principles, supra note 5, at 2.Google Scholar
32 A. Ng & Martin Loosemore, Risk Allocation in the Private Provision of Public Infrastructure, 25 Int'l J. of Proj. Mgmt. 66, 68 (2007).Google Scholar
33 Bank Track, supra note 13, at 2.Google Scholar
34 Equator Principles, The Equator Principles Governance Association Rules, 7 (2010), available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/ep_governance_rules_june_2010.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
35 Coulson, Andrea, A Benchmarking Study: Environmental Credit Risk Factors in the Pan European Banking Sector, Isis Asset Management 1, 7, (2002), available at: http://www.peblds.org/files/Publications/Articles/ISIS_Environmental_Credit_Risk_Factors.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
36 Id. Google Scholar
37 Forest Reinhardt, Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management (2000).Google Scholar
38 Conley & Williams, supra note 2, at 11.Google Scholar
39 Richardson, Benjamin, Protecting Indigenous Peoples through Socially Responsible Investment, 6 Indigen. L. J. 205, 225 (2007).Google Scholar
40 Bank Track, supra note 13, at 2.Google Scholar
41 Conley, & Williams, , supra note 2, at 3.Google Scholar
42 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 9.Google Scholar
43 Esty, Benjamin, The Economic Motivations for Using Project Finance 1, 6 Harvard Business School (2003), available at: http://www.people.hbs.edu/besty/BCE%20PF%20Motivations%202-14-03.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
44 Id. at 7-8.Google Scholar
45 Farrell, , supra note 18, at 555.Google Scholar
46 Ng, & Loosemore, , supra note 32, at 2.Google Scholar
47 Sorge, Marco, The Nature of Credit Risk in Project Finance, 91 Bis Q. Rev. (December 2004).Google Scholar
48 Sorge, Marco & Gadanecz, Blaise, The Term Structure of Credit Spreads in Project Finance, 13 Int'l J. of Fin. & Econ. 68, 69 (2005).Google Scholar
49 Id. at 78.Google Scholar
50 Farrell, , supra note 18, at 550.Google Scholar
51 CBC News, Harper ‘disappointed’ by Keystone Pipeline Delay, 13 November 2011, available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/11/13/keystone-ioe-oliver.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
52 Lerman, David & Gaouette, Nicole, Keystone Pipeline Advances in Revised Environmental Study, Bloomberg (15 April 2011), available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-15/keystone-pipeline-advances-in-revised-environmental-study.html (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
53 ForestEthics, Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines: Community Opposition and Investment Risks (2010), available at: http://www.forestethics.org/downloads/Enbr_investor_brief_oct2010_Final.pdf (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
54 Phil Case, Environmental Risk Management and Corporate Lending: a Global Perspective 12 (1999).Google Scholar
55 Coulson, , supra note 35, at 9.Google Scholar
56 Conley, & Williams, , supra note 2, at 17.Google Scholar
57 See Bank Track, supra note 13.Google Scholar
58 Bank Track, Dodgy Deals Map, available at: http://www.banktrack.org/dodgydealmap (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
59 Amalric, , supra note 6, at 5.Google Scholar
60 Ng & Loosemore, supra note 32, at 5.Google Scholar
61 Richardson, Benjamin, Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment, 46 OSGOODE HALL L. J. 243, 246, (2008).Google Scholar
62 Id. Google Scholar
63 Luhmann, Niklas, Risk: A Sociological Theory 6 (1993).Google Scholar
64 Id. at VIII.Google Scholar
65 McCarthy, Shawn, Ottawa's new anti-terrorism strategy lists eco-terrorists as threats, The Globe and Mail (6 September 2012) available at: http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawas-new-anti-terrorism-strategy-lists-eco-extremists-as-threats/article2334975/?service=mobile (last accessed: 1 December 2012).Google Scholar
66 Kasperson, et al, The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory, in The Social Amplification of Risk 13, 15 (Pidgeon et. al., eds., 2003).Google Scholar
67 Breakwell, & Barnett, , Social Amplification of risk and the Layering Method, in The Social Amplification of Risk 80 (Pidgeon et al. eds., 2003).Google Scholar
68 Kasperson, , supra note 66, at 13.Google Scholar
69 Id. at 13.Google Scholar
70 Ng, & Loosemore, , supra note 32, at 2.Google Scholar