Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:37:03.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Decision on Inheritance Tax by the German Constitutional Court: A Brief Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Germany, endowments and bequeathals are subject to between seven and fifty percent inheritance tax. Small and medium-sized family-run businesses are exempt from inheritance tax either partially or entirely. On 17 December 2014, Germany's Constitutional Court ruled that the present system of enabling businesses to “avoid paying” inheritance tax was in violation of the “rule of equal tax principal.” Furthermore, the inheritance tax law in its current form leaves plenty of leeway for variations in percentages of payments, which are difficult to justify. Thus, the Court ruled, existing laws are unconstitutional and must be reformed and replaced.

In this case note we argue from a socio-ethical viewpoint that inheritances taxes are in principle morally justified. One important key element of the tax system is trust. This trust can be strengthened by (1) creating sustainable laws that will stand the test of constitutional screening, (2) offering plausible justification for fiscal policies including exemptions on clear normative principles like subsidiarity, common good, freedom and simplicity, and (3) broadening the tax-paying basis without undercutting relevant human agency.

Type
Special Section
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

Bierhoff, Hans-Werner & Rohmann, Elke, Psychologie des Vertrauens, in Vertrauen - Zwischen sozialem Kitt und der Senkung von Transaktionskosten 71–89 (Matthias Maring ed., 2010).Google Scholar
Evans, Michelle, The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Social and Political Principle in Catholic Social Teaching, 3(1) Solidarity: The J. Catholic Social Thought & Secular Ethics 44–60 (2013).Google Scholar
Evensky, Jerry, Adam Smith's Essentials: On Trust, Faith, and Free Markets, 33(2) J. Hist. Econ. Thought 249-67 (2011).Google Scholar
Gaisbauer, Helmut P., Erbschaftssteuer im Kontext (Neumaier, Otto, Schweiger, Gottfried, & Sedmak, Clemens, eds., 2013).Google Scholar
Maultzsch, Felix, Morals and Markets: The Significance of Pre-Tax Ownership, 67(3) Mod. L. Rev. 508-23 (2004).Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam, Taxes, Property, Justice, 1(2) N.Y.U. J. L. & Liberty 983-86 (2005).Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam & Nagel, Thomas, The Myth of Ownership. Taxes and Justice (2002).Google Scholar
Sedmak, Clemens, Armutsbekämpfung. Eine Grundlegung (2013).Google Scholar
Soellner, Ralf, Ausgewählte Ergebnisse für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen in Deutschland 2009 (2011).Google Scholar