Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:20:55.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht of April 12, 2005 – Concerning Police Use of Global Position Systems as a Surveillance Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Nicole Jacoby

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

On April 12, 2005, the Bundesverfassunsgreicht (German Federal Constitutional Court) ruled that regulations in the Strafprozessordnung (StPO – Code of Criminal Procedure) concerning police use of global positioning systems (GPS) did not violate the Grundgesetz (GG – German Constitution or Basic Law) so long as the investigators did not use the technology in conjunction with other surveillance methods that could lead to the construction of a personality profile of the suspect observed. The following comment examines the facts of the case and evaluates the Court's decision in detail.

Type
Developments
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 7 , 01 July 2005 , pp. 1085 - 1092
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 BVerfG, 2 BvR 581/01 from April 12, 2005, available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20050412_2bvr058101.html.Google Scholar

2 For an English version, see http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/StPO.htm.Google Scholar

3 For an English version, see http://www.bundestag.de/htdocs_e/info/gg.pdf.Google Scholar

4 Gesetz zur Bekämpfung des illegalen Rauschgifthandels und anderer Erscheinungsformen der Organisierten Kriminalität, of July 15, 1992 (BGBl. I S. 1302).Google Scholar

5 § 100c StPO.Google Scholar

6 § 100c StPO (1)1a.Google Scholar

7 § 100c StPO (1)1b.Google Scholar

8 § 100c StPO (1)1b.Google Scholar

9 § 100c StPO (1)3.Google Scholar

10 See § 163f StPO.Google Scholar

11 § 163f StPO (1)1-2.Google Scholar

12 § 163f StPO (3).Google Scholar

13 § 163f StPO.(4).Google Scholar

14 BVerfG, 2 BvR 581/01 from April 12, 2005, para. 27-29, available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20050412_2bvr058101.html.Google Scholar

15 Id. at para. 14.Google Scholar

16 Id. at para. 15.Google Scholar

17 Grundgesetz [Constitution] art. 1, para. 1.Google Scholar

18 Killean, James J., Der Große Lauschangriff: Germany Brings Home the War on Organized Crime, 23 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 173, 186 (2000).Google Scholar

19 Grundgesetz [Constitution] art. 2, para. 1.Google Scholar

20 Grundgesetz [Constitution] art. 2, para. 2.Google Scholar

21 See Killean, supra note 18, at 189.Google Scholar

22 See Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany 314 (2d ed. 1997); Killean, supra note 18, at 189.Google Scholar

23 BGH, Juristen Zeitung [JZ], 56 (2001), 1144.Google Scholar

24 Id. See BVerfG, 2 BvR 581/01 from April 12, 2005, para. 23-26, available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20050412_2bvr058101.html.Google Scholar

25 BVerfG, 2 BvR 581/01 from April 12, 2005, available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20050412_2bvr058101.html.Google Scholar

26 Id. at para. 56.Google Scholar

27 Id. at para. 53.Google Scholar

28 Id. at para. 51.Google Scholar

29 Id. at para. 51.Google Scholar

30 Id. at para. 60.Google Scholar

31 Id. at para. 16.Google Scholar

32 Id. at para. 67.Google Scholar

33 Id. at para. 67.Google Scholar

34 Id. at para. 62.Google Scholar

35 Id. at para. 62.Google Scholar

36 Id. at para. 62.Google Scholar

37 Id. at para. 63.Google Scholar

38 Id. at para. 64.Google Scholar

39 BVerfGE 65, 1 at para. 154 (translation from Kommers, supra note 22, at 324).Google Scholar

40 Volkszählungsgesetz 1983 (VoZählG 1983) of March 25, 1982 (BGBl. I S. 369), § 9 Abs. 2-3.Google Scholar

41 BVerfGE 65, 1 at para. 210-212.Google Scholar

42 Id. at para. 102, 104 (translation from Kommers, supra note 22 at 324).Google Scholar

43 Id. at para. 102 (translation from Kommers, supra note 22, at 324).Google Scholar

44 Id. at para. 156-157 (translation from Kommers, supra note 22, at 324).Google Scholar

45 BVerfG, 1 BvR 2378/98 from March 3, 2004, para. 119-120, available at http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20040303_1bvr237898.html Google Scholar

46 Id. at para. 120.Google Scholar

47 Id. at para. 54.Google Scholar

48 Id. at para.148.Google Scholar

49 See Hörbst, Günther, Auch als Wanze – wie GPS den Standort verrät, Hamburger Abendblatt (April 12, 2005), available at http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2005/04/13/420970.html; Christian Rath, Polizei darf per Satellit schnüffeln, Die Tageszeitung (April 13, 2005), available at http://www.taz.de/pt/2005/04/13/a0104.nf/text.ges,1.Google Scholar

50 See Gebauer, Mattias, Das Arsenal der High-Tech Polizistin, Spiegel Online (April 12, 2005), at http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,350921,00.html; Kay-Alexander Scholz, Überwachung per Handy ist viel bequemer, Deutsche Welle Online (April 12, 2005), at http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1550210,00.html. Cf. Jim McKay, Nowhere to Hide, Government Technology (June 2004) (discussing the development and use of location technology by law enforcement officials in the United States).Google Scholar

51 See id.Google Scholar