Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:55:37.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Intimacy: Jacques Derrida and the Friendship of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Anne Orford

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since receiving the invitation to participate in this special issue, I have been wondering about whether I can do justice in this brief space to what I have learnt from reading Derrida. And as someone who long ago began to distrust those versions of the history of ideas organized around the names of important individuals, I've also wondered about how and why I would want to link lessons to the proper name “Jacques Derrida.” Indeed the pleasure, and even the reward, I have received from reading Derrida is hard for me to separate out from the experience of living as part of a community that exists within and across the institutions I inhabit, with colleagues, students and friends. I associate Derrida with a way of life, a way of reading, writing, speaking and listening to each other, that is part of the “simple day-to-dayness” and “the intense moments of work, teaching and thinking” that constitutes this community, that allies us. I hope I can communicate a little of what reading Derrida has meant, and still does mean, to me then within this particular institutional life.

Type
Articles: Special Issue: A Dedication to Jacques Derrida – Memoirs
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 1: Articles: Special issue - A Dedication to Jacques Derrida , 01 January 2005 , pp. 31 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Derrida, Jacques, The Work of Mourning 74, 115 (2001).Google Scholar

2 Admittedly, my first thought was: how uncomfortable, that's a lot of people to have under your skin; sounds quite lumpy.Google Scholar

3 Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology 157-164 (Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak trans., 1976).Google Scholar

4 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present 425 (1999).Google Scholar

5 Derrida, supra note 1 at 201.Google Scholar

6 William Shakespeare, The Tempest, I, 2.Google Scholar

7 Philadelphoff-Puren, Nina and Rush, Peter, Fatal (F)laws: Law, Literature and Writing, 14 Law and Critique 191, 202 (2003).Google Scholar

8 Derrida, Jacques, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, & the New International 86 (Peggy Kamuf trans., 1994).Google Scholar

9 This reading of the meaning of this sense of crisis in the discipline of international law is developed in: Anne Orford, The Destiny of International Law, 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 441-476 (2004).Google Scholar

10 Charlesworth, Hilary, International Law: A Discipline of Crisis, 65 Modern Law Review 377 (2002).Google Scholar

11 Derrida, Jacques, Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority, 11 Cardozo Law Review 921, 943 (1990).Google Scholar

12 Id. at 993.Google Scholar

13 Id. at 943.Google Scholar

14 Derrida, Jacques, The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond 353 (Alan Bass trans., 1987) (discussing the tradition of psychoanalysis in these terms).Google Scholar

15 Id.Google Scholar

16 See Orford, supra note 9 at 464-476.Google Scholar

17 Spivak, supra note 4 at 426 (suggesting that where Derrida's earlier work was concerned to guard the question or insist “on the priority of an unanswerable question,” his later work has “a greater emphasis on ethics.”).Google Scholar

18 Id. Spivak describes this turn as representing “an other-directed swerve” in Derrida's philosophy.Google Scholar

19 Derrida, Jacques, The Gift of Death (David Wills trans., 1995).Google Scholar

20 Id. at 58.Google Scholar

21 Id. at 5-6.Google Scholar

22 See Anne Orford, Trade, Human Rights and the Economy of Sacrifice, Jean Monnet Working Paper 03/04, NYU School of Law, available at http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/04/040301.html. A substantially revised version of this paper will be published in 2005 in the Leiden Journal of International Law symposium on aesthetics and international law.Google Scholar

23 On the reward of the righteous, see Matthew, 10:34–40 (Revised Standard Version).Google Scholar

24 See Orford, supra note 22. In thinking about international economic law as political theology, I am influenced by: Jennifer Beard, Understanding International Development Programs as a Modern Phenomenon of Early and Medieval Christian Theology, 18 Australian Feminist Law Journal 27 (2003); and Judith E. Grbich, Aesthetics in Christian Juridico-Theological Tracts: The Wanderings of Faith and Nomos, 12 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 351 (2000).Google Scholar

25 The (now infamous) Memorandum for Alberto R Gonzales, Counsel to the President, from Jay S Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, US Department of Justice, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. Sections 2340-2340A (August 1, 2002) sets out the argument that “a nation's right of self-defense” would justify a “government defendant” in torturing or otherwise harming “an enemy combatant during an interrogation in a manner that might arguably violate Section 2340A” of the United States Code implementing the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment. For the related argument that self-defence offers a basis upon which to derogate from other human rights norms, see Shabtai Rosenne, The Perplexities of Modern International Law 216, 234 (2004).Google Scholar

26 Anne Orford, Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law 203-219 (2003).Google Scholar

27 Derrida, supra note 8 at 176.Google Scholar

28 Id. at 175.Google Scholar

29 Costas Douzinas, The End of Human Rights 357 (2000).Google Scholar

30 Günther, Klaus, The Legacies of Injustice and Fear: A European Approach to Human Rights and their Effects on Political Culture, in The EU and Human Rights 117-144 (Philip Alston ed., 1999).Google Scholar

31 Id. at 126 (emphasis in the original).Google Scholar

32 The UN Charter and the major human rights covenants are regularly described in these terms as an international legal response to the Holocaust and an attempt to protect individuals from future excesses of state power.Google Scholar

33 Günther, supra note 30 at 126-7.Google Scholar

34 Kafka, Franz, Before the Law, in Metamorphosis and Other Stories 165-166 (Malcolm Pasley trans., 1992).Google Scholar

35 For a related exploration of this question, see Orford, supra note 26 at chapter 6.Google Scholar

36 Derrida, supra note 1 at 201; see, particularly, Jacques Derrida, The Politics of Friendship (George Collins trans., 1997); and the beautiful collection of elegies and lamentations written by Derrida after the deaths of his friends and collected in Derrida, supra note 1.Google Scholar

37 Jacques Lacan, Le Séminaire, livre II: Le Moi dans la théorie de Freud at dans la technique psychanalytique 250 (Shoshana Felman trans., 1978) (quoted by Shoshana Felman, Jacques Lacan and the Adventure of Insight 136 (1987).Google Scholar

38 Id.Google Scholar

39 Gallop, Jane, The Father's Seduction, in Daughters & Fathers 97, 99 (Lynda E. Boose and Betty S. Flowers eds., 1989).Google Scholar

40 Felman, Shoshana, The Scandal of the Speaking Body: Don Juan with J L Austin, or Seduction in Two Languages 16 (2003).Google Scholar

41 Id. at 44.Google Scholar

42 Id. at 41.Google Scholar

43 Id. at 44.Google Scholar

44 Derrida, supra note 14 at 81.Google Scholar

45 Id.Google Scholar

46 Id. at 67.Google Scholar

47 Id. at 56.Google Scholar

48 Id. at 69.Google Scholar

49 Felman, supra note 40 at 15.Google Scholar

50 Derrida, supra note 14 at 29.Google Scholar

51 Id. at 39.Google Scholar