No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 Nicola Lacey, A Life of H.L.A. Hart. The Nightmare and the Noble Dream (2004).Google Scholar
2 See, e.g., id. at 129 (Jenifer Hart); 353 (Ronald Dworkin).Google Scholar
3 Id. at 1.Google Scholar
4 Id. at 3 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
5 Id. at 1.Google Scholar
6 See id. at 122.Google Scholar
7 See id. at xxii. “Since my ambition was to write a book which could be read as a complete narrative, and following Herbert Hart's own example in The Concept of Law, […].”Google Scholar
8 There are now and then a few repetitions, but they are mostly an implication of the literary genre that implies recursive narrative processes.Google Scholar
9 Neil MacCormick, HLA Hart (1981).Google Scholar
10 Lacey, supra note 1, at xxii.Google Scholar
11 Blackburn, Simon and Waldron, Jeremy, “Letter” In Reply to Thomas Nagel's Review of Nicola Lacey's Book, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html.Google Scholar
12 See the exchange between Thomas Nagel, Jeremy Waldron and Simon Blackburn. Letters, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html. See also Thomas Nagel, “The Central Questions” – Review of Nicola Lacey's A Life of H.L.A. Hart, 27 London Review of Books No. 3 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/nage01_.html.Google Scholar
13 See the same exchange between Nagel, Waldron and Blackburn, supra note 12. See also Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar
14 See the Biographer's Note on Approach and Sources at the beginning of the book.Google Scholar
15 Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii.Google Scholar
16 See id. at 357.Google Scholar
17 On these two central questions, see id. at 3. “This contrast between his public and private worlds raises fascinating questions not only about Hart's background and personality but also about the nature of his intellectual creativity and about the quality of the social world, with is various intersecting hierarchies, in which he lived.” (emphasis added).Google Scholar
18 Id. at xix. See, e.g., Nicola Lacey, Unspeakable Subjects (1998); Nicola Lacey, Feminist Perspectives on Ethical Positivism, in Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism (T. Campbell and J. Goldsworthy eds. 2000); Nicola Lacey, Philosophical Foundations of the Common Law: Social not Metaphysical, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (J. Horder ed. 2000); Nicola Lacey and E. Jackson, Introducing Feminist Legal Theory, in Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials (J. Penner, D. Schiff and R. Nobles eds. 2002); Nicola Lacey, Feminist Legal Theories and the Rights of Women, in Gender and Human Rights (Karen Knopp ed. 2004).Google Scholar
19 Lacey, supra note 1, at xvii.Google Scholar
20 Id. at xix.Google Scholar
21 Id. at xviii-xix.Google Scholar
22 Id. at xix.Google Scholar
23 Id. at xx.Google Scholar
24 See id. at 3 (“Life and Scholarship”).Google Scholar
25 See, e.g., Lacey, Unspeakable Subjects, supra note 18.Google Scholar
26 Lacey, supra note 1, at xvii.Google Scholar
27 Id. at xvii.Google Scholar
28 Id. at xvii. One exception is on page 352 and even then it is a scientific contribution rather than a personal one.Google Scholar
29 Id. at xviii.Google Scholar
30 Id. at xvii.Google Scholar
31 Id. at xviii.Google Scholar
32 See Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar
33 Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii.Google Scholar
34 Id. at xx.Google Scholar
35 See Nagel, supra note 12.Google Scholar
36 Lacey, supra note 1, at xix.Google Scholar
37 Id. at ix. See J. Ryan, “Letter” In Reply to Nagel's Review of Nicola Lacey's Book, 27 London Review of Books No. 4 (2005), available at http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n04/letters.html.Google Scholar
38 Lacey, supra note 1, at xix.Google Scholar
39 Id. at xix.Google Scholar
40 Id. at xix-xx.Google Scholar
41 Id. at xix. Contra: id. at xviii (“Voyage of Discovery”).Google Scholar
42 Id. at xix.Google Scholar
43 Id. at xxi.Google Scholar
44 Id. at 3.Google Scholar
45 Id. at 66 (Connecting the mutual attraction of Herbert and Jenifer Hart to their different social origins and their respective longing to belong to the opposite side).Google Scholar
46 Interestingly, Lacey uses a “back and forth” narration technique in emphasizing elements in her story that allow her to attract attention on features which will be confirmed later on.Google Scholar
47 See Lacey, supra note 1, at xviii. See also id. at 229-232. On this debate, see Hart, H.L.A., American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream, 11 Georgia Law Review 969 (1977).Google Scholar
48 See, e.g., Lacey, supra note 1, at 61. “There is no evidence that Herbert had any significant sexual relationships during the first half of the decade. This lack of sexual relationships might be explained in terms of the amount of time he was devoting to work, and the emotional reserve which characterized most of his friendships was doubtless to some degree simply a product of the prevailing culture in the 1930s.” (emphasis added).Google Scholar
49 Id. at 61.Google Scholar
50 Id. at Chapter 4.Google Scholar
51 Id. at 73-74.Google Scholar
52 Id. at 203-208.Google Scholar
53 See id. at 33-35.Google Scholar
54 Id. at 12.Google Scholar
55 See id. at 269.Google Scholar
56 See id. at 271.Google Scholar
57 Id. at 342.Google Scholar
58 See id. at 119.Google Scholar
59 Id. at 356.Google Scholar
60 See id. at 51-57.Google Scholar
61 See, e.g., id. at 112 ff.Google Scholar
62 Id. at 52.Google Scholar
63 Id. at 151.Google Scholar
64 Id. at 53.Google Scholar
65 Id. at 233.Google Scholar
66 Id. at 129.Google Scholar
67 Id. at 131.Google Scholar
68 Id. at 363.Google Scholar
69 Id. at 353.Google Scholar
70 Id. at 208.Google Scholar
71 Id. at 357.Google Scholar