Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:43:14.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ambivalent Role of Experiential Learning in American Legal Education and the Problem of Legal Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

David M. Siegel

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent criticism of American legal education has focused on its being theory-driven rather than practice driven, which either produces or reinforces a divide or gap between theory and practice. Yet two features of American legal education expressly draw upon experiential learning, one directly by sending students into experiential learning situations (legal clinics) and the other indirectly by bringing instructors who are engaged full-time in active practice into the classroom (i.e. adjunct faculty). If skills development is a feature of American legal education, to what degree can, or should, this be transplanted to other systems of legal education? Are American experiential techniques of legal education meaningful elsewhere?

Type
Section 2: ‘Geared Toward Practice?’ Assessing the Current Law School Race to Legal Skills-Building
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 6-7: Following the Call of the Wild: The Promises and Perils of Transnationalizing Legal Education , July 2009 , pp. 815 - 822
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Sullivan, William M., Et Al, Educating Lawyers: Preparation For The Profession Of Law, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2007) (hereafter “Carnegie Report”).Google Scholar

2 Id., summary at 7.Google Scholar

3 Lander, David A., Are Adjuncts a Benefit or a Detriment?, 33 Univ. of Dayton Law Rev. 285 (2008) (citing 2004 survey, and conducting 2008 survey) (hereafter “Lander”).Google Scholar

4 Lander, , supra note 3, at 288. Lander sent a survey to all law schools in the AALS Directory; fifty-six responded.Google Scholar

5 Id. Google Scholar

6 American Bar Association, Standard 403(c) (“Instructional Role of Faculty”), 2008–2009 Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools. Available at http://www.abanet.org/legaled/standards/20082009StandardsWebContent/Chapter%204.pdf (last accessed on 14 June 2009) (hereafter “ABA Standards”).Google Scholar

7 ABA Standards, Standard 403(a).Google Scholar

8 ABA Standards, Interpretation 402–1(1) to Standard 402 (“Size of the Full-Time Faculty”).Google Scholar

9 Lander, , supra note 3, at 289–90.Google Scholar

10 Id., at 291–92.Google Scholar

11 A 2003 by the National Center for Education Statistics found 43.7 percent of instructional faculty at degree-granting institutions in the US were part-time faculty. National Center for Education Statistics, 2005. Full-time and part-time instructional faculty and staff in degree-granting institutions, by field and faculty characteristics: Fall 1992, Fall 1998, and Fall 2003 Table 232. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Available at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d05/tables/dt05_232.asp (last accessed on 14 June 2009).Google Scholar

12 Thedwall, Kate, Nontenure-Track Faculty: Rising Numbers, Lost Opportunities, 143 New Directions for Higher Education (Fall 2008).Google Scholar

13 Id., at 13.Google Scholar

14 Landrum, R. Eric, Are there Instructional Differences between Full-time and Part-time Faculty?, 57 College Teaching 23, 25 (Winter 2009).Google Scholar

15 Eric Bettinger and Bridget Terry Long, Do College Instructors Matter? The Effects of Adjuncts and Graduate Assistants on Students’ Interests and Success, NBER Working Paper No. 10370 (2004).Google Scholar

16 Id. at 25–26.Google Scholar

17 Andreas Bücker and William A. Woodruff, The Bologna Process and German Legal Education: Developing Professional Competence Through Clinical Experiences, 9 German L. J. 575, 578–609 (2008).Google Scholar

18 ABA Standards, supra note 6, Standard 302(b)(1) (“Curriculum”) (“The offering of live-client or real-life experiences may be accomplished through clinics or field placements. A law school need not offer these experiences to every student nor must a law school accommodate every student requesting enrollment in any particular live-client or other real-life practice experience.”).Google Scholar

19 Id., Interpretation 302–5.Google Scholar

20 Santacroce, David A. & Kuehn, Robert R., Report of the 2007–2008 Survey, Center for the Study of Applied Legal Education at 10. Available at: http://www.csale.org/CSALE.07-08.Survey.Report.pdf (last accessed 14 June 2009). 145 schools (77%) responded to the “Master Survey.” Id. at 1.Google Scholar

21 Id. at 10–11.Google Scholar

22 Id. at 11–12.Google Scholar

23 Andreas Bücker and William A. Woodruff, The Bologna Process and German Legal Education: Developing Professional Competence Through Clinical Experiences, 9 German L. J. 575, 589 (2008).Google Scholar

24 Id. at 609–610.Google Scholar

25 Skrodzka, Marta, et al, The Next Step Forward - The Development Of Clinical Legal Education In Poland Through A Clinical Pilot Program In Bialystok, 2 Col. J. East. Eur. L. 56, 71–72 (2008) (noting practical training before second level examination in Germany, pupilage year in the UK, and three year period for acquisition of practical skills in Poland).Google Scholar

26 Skrodzka, Marta, at al, The Next Step Forward - The Development Of Clinical Legal Education In Poland Through A Clinical Pilot Program In Bialystok, 2 Col. J. East. Eur. L. 56, 68 (2008).Google Scholar

27 Selezneva, Tatiana, Innovative Legal Education and Its Role in Developing the State Based on the Rule of Law: Analysis of the U.S. Law Schools Academic Experience and the Prospects of its Implementation in the Republic of Belarus, 58 J. Legal Educ. 122, 138 (2008) (purposes of legal education include “guide the student in how to practice active social and democratic modes of behavior”); Andreas Bücker and William A. Woodruff, The Bologna Process and German Legal Education: Developing Professional Competence Through Clinical Experiences, 9 German L. J. 575, 611–613 (2008).Google Scholar

28 Wilson, Richard J., Three Law School Clinics in Chile, 1970–2000: Innovation, Resistance and Conformity in the Global South, 8 Clin. L. Rev. 515, 518 n. 8 (2002).Google Scholar

29 Wortham, Leah, Aiding Clinical Education Abroad: What Can Be Gained and the Learning Curve on How to Do So Effectively, 12 Clin. L. Rev. 615 (2006).Google Scholar

30 Chase, Oscar G., Legal Processes and National Culture, 5 Cardozo J. Int'l and Comp. L. 1 (1997) (suggesting efficiency advantages of German civil procedure would impose other costs on the American legal system because they are premised on features of German culture).Google Scholar

31 Nelken, David, Using the Concept of Legal Culture, Center for the Study of Law and Society Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program (2004) Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/csls/lss/20 (last accessed on 14 June 2009).Google Scholar

32 Genty, Philip M., Overcoming Cultural Blindness in International Clinical Collaboration: The Divide between Civil and Common Law Cultures and Its Implications for Clinical Education, 15 Clinical L. Rev. 131 (2008).Google Scholar

33 Id., at 149–152.Google Scholar

34 Cavise, Leonard, Essay: The Transition from the Inquisitorial to the Accusatorial System of Trial Procedure: Why Some Latin American Lawyers Hesitate, 53 Wayne L. Rev. 785 (2007).Google Scholar

35 Id. at 803–812.Google Scholar

36 Id. at 815.Google Scholar