Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:19:55.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Administrative Constitutionalism and the Political Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Moritz Hartmann

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Between the relics of a nation state past and the promises of a transnational future, the normative evolution of the European Union has rightly been described as “an international legal experiment.” Europeanization, in that sense, has been construed as an experimental legal mode for the integration of national economic diversity through harmonized regulation. Even though the European Union's operating code has remained decisively economic, the normative matrix itself has transcended the historical objective of economic homogeneity. European integration therefore experienced a normative turn after the completion of the single market; the European Union progressively captured the social space of the continent, evolving into a societal experiment of normative imagination and cultural plurality, taking it beyond economic integration, market freedoms, and monetary stability.

Type
Special Issue - Regeneration Europe
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 5: Special issue - Regeneration Europe , 01 May 2013 , pp. 695 - 714
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Witte, Bruno de, The European Union as an International Legal Experiment, in The Worlds of European Constitutionalism 19, 19 (Graínne de Búrca & Joseph H. H. Weiler eds., 2012).Google Scholar

2 See generally Giandomenico Majone, Europe as the Would-Be World Power: The EU at Fifty (2009).Google Scholar

3 Witte, Floris De, EU Law, Politics, and the Social Question (in this issue).Google Scholar

4 Anderson, Hans Christian, The Emperor's New Clothes (2004).Google Scholar

5 See generally Peter L. Lindseth, Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (2010).Google Scholar

6 Dellavalle, Sergio, Addressing Diversity in Post-Unitary Theories of Order, in Diversity and the Law (Holger Hestermeyer ed., forthcoming).Google Scholar

7 Id. Google Scholar

8 See Walter Hallstein, Der Unvollendete Bundesstaat: Europäische Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse 33 (1969).Google Scholar

9 See Weiler, Joseph H. H., The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale L.J. 2403, 2410 (1991); Morten Rasmussen, From Costa v ENEL to the Treaties of Rome: A Brief History of a Legal Revolution, in The Past and Future of EU Law 69, 69 (Miguel Maduro & Loïc Azoulai eds., 2010); Jürgen Habermas, Zur Verfassung Europas: Ein Essay 59 (2011).Google Scholar

10 See generally Dellavalle, supra note 6.Google Scholar

11 Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, Apr. 18, 1951, 261 U.N.T.S. 140.Google Scholar

12 See Case 26/62, NV Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratis der Belastingen, 1 E.C.R. 3 (1963); Bruno de Witte, Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order, in The Evolution of EU Law 323, 323 (Paul Craig & Graínne de Búrca eds., 2011); Loïc Azoulai, The Acquis of the European Union and International Organisations, 11 Eur. L.J. 196, 199 (2005).Google Scholar

13 Single European Act, July 1, 1987, 1987 O.J. (L 169) 1; Treaty on European Union (Maastricht text), July 29, 1992, 1992 O.J. (C 191) 1.Google Scholar

14 See Haltern, Ulrich, Rechtswissenschaft als Europawissenschaft, in Europawissenschaft 56, 56 (Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Ingolf Pernice & Ulrich Haltern eds., 2005); Joseph H. H. Weiler, The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism, 1 Y.B. Eur. L. 267, 292 (1981).Google Scholar

15 See Chiti, Edoardo, The Governance of Compliance, in Compliance and Enforcement of EU Law 31, 31 (Marise Cremona ed., 2012).Google Scholar

16 See generally Niklas Luhmann, Vertrauen: Ein Reduktionsmechanismus Sozialer Komplexität (1973).Google Scholar

17 Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union, Mar. 30, 2010, 2010 O.J. (C 83) 13.Google Scholar

18 Kramer, Roderick M., Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions, 50 Ann. Rev. of Psychol. 569, 573 (1999).Google Scholar

19 See generally Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (1990); Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil (1651).Google Scholar

20 See Hartmann, Martin, Die Praxis des Vertrauens 185 (2011).Google Scholar

21 See Gambetta, Diego, Can We Trust The Trust?, in Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 213, 214 (1988).Google Scholar

22 Tomasello, Michael, Why We Cooperate 96 (2009).Google Scholar

23 See Franzius, Claudio, Gewährleistung im Recht 208 (2009).Google Scholar

24 Tomasello, Michael, Why be Nice? Better Not Think About it, 16 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 580, 581 (2012).Google Scholar

25 See Tomasello, , supra note 22, at 88; Giddens, supra note 19, at 107; Jack Knight, Institutions and Social Conflict (1992); Iris Bohnet & Yael Baytelman, Institutions and Trust: Implications for Preferences, Beliefs and Behaviors, 19 Rationality and Soc'y 99, 99 (2007).Google Scholar

26 See Tomasello, , supra note 22, at 72.Google Scholar

27 See Majone, Giandomenico, Mutual Trust, Credible Commitments and the Evolution of Rules for a Single European Market 9 (Eur. Univ. Inst., Working Paper No. 1, 1995).Google Scholar

28 See Kaufhold, Ann-Katrin, Gegenseitiges Vertrauen: Wirksamkeitsbedingung und Rechtsprinzip der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit im Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts, 47 Europarecht 408, 408 (2012).Google Scholar

29 See Ulrich K. Preuß, Europa als politische Gemeinschaft, in Europawissenschaft 529, 529 (Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Ingolf Pernice & Ulrich Haltern eds., 2005).Google Scholar

30 See Calliess, Christian, Die Neue Europäische Union Nach Dem Vertrag von Lissabon 116 (2010).Google Scholar

31 See Marty, Mireille Delmas, Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework For Understanding The Transnational Legal World 37 (2009).Google Scholar

32 See Jacobs, Francis G., The Court of Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Challenges Ahead for the Judicial System?, in The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law—La Cour De Justice et la Construction De L'europe: Analyses et Perspectives De Soixante Ans De Jurisprudence 49, 49 (Court of Justice of the European Union ed., 2013).Google Scholar

33 See Susana de la Sierra, The Constitutional Bases of European Administrative Law, in What's New In European Administrative Law? 29, 29 (Jacques Ziller ed., Eur. Univ. Inst., Working Paper No. 10, 2005), available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/3330/law05-10.pdf.Google Scholar

34 See Somek, Alexander, What is Political Union? (in this issue).Google Scholar

35 See generally Susana Borrás & Bent Greve, Special Issue on the Open Method of Coordination, 11 J. Eur. Pub. Pol'y 185, 185 (2004).Google Scholar

36 See Nickel, Rainer, Participatory Governance and European Administrative Law: New Legal Benchmarks for the New European Public Order, in Law, Democracy and Solidarity In A Post-National Union 44, 44 (Erik O. Eriksen, Christian Joerges & Florian Rödl eds., 2008).Google Scholar

37 See generally Dellavalle, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

38 Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Mar. 30, 2010, 2010 O.J. (C 83) 47.Google Scholar

39 See Kahl, Wolfgang, Der Europäische Verwaltungsverbund: Strukturen-Typen-Phänomene, 50 Der Staat 360, 360 (2011).Google Scholar

40 See Hofmann, Herwig C. H., Gerard C. Rowe & Alexander H. Türk, Administrative Law And Policy Of The European Union 411 (2009).Google Scholar

41 See Calliess, Christian, Die Neue Europäische Union Nach Dem Vertrag Von Lissabon 47 (2010).Google Scholar

42 See Aziz, Miriam, The Impact Of European Rights On National Legal Cultures 5 (2004).Google Scholar

43 See Hofmann, Herwig C.H. & Alexander H. Türk, The Development of Integrated Administration in the EU and its Consequences, 13 Eur. L.J. 253, 253 (2007).Google Scholar

44 Davies, Gareth T., Constitutional Disagreement in Europe and the Search for Pluralism, in Constitutional Pluralism In The European Union And Beyond 269, 271 (Matej Avbelj & Jan Komárek eds., 2012).Google Scholar

45 See Hofmann, Herwig C.H. & Alexander H. Türk, Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law by the Move to an Integrated Administration, in Legal Challenges In EU Administrative Law: Towards An Integrated Administration 355, 355 (Herwig C.H. Hofmann, & Alexander H. Türk eds., 2009).Google Scholar

46 See generally Kirchhof, Paul, The Balance of Powers Between National and European Institutions, 5 Eur. L.J. 225, 225 (1999).Google Scholar

47 See Honneth, Axel, Kampf Um Anerkennung: Zur Moralischen Grammatik Sozialer Konflikte 64 (1994).Google Scholar

48 See Aziz, , supra note 42, at 6.Google Scholar

49 See generally Domingo, Rafael, The New Global Law (2010); Benedict Kingsbury, Nico Krisch & Richard B. Stewart, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 L. & Contemp. Probs. 15 (2005).Google Scholar

50 See Craig, Paul, EU Administrative Law 152 (2006); Case C-9/56, Meroni v. High Auth. of the European Coal and Steel Comty, 1958 E.C.R. I-1958; Communication from the Commission on the Operating Framework for the European Regulatory Agencies, COM (2002) 718 final (Dec. 11, 2002); Draft of an Interinstitutional Agreement on the Operating Framework for the European Regulatory Agencies, COM (2005) 59 final (Feb. 25, 2005).Google Scholar

51 See Commission Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the Management of Community Programmes by Networks of National Agencies Delegations Will Find Attached Commission Document, COM (2001) 648 final (Nov. 13, 2001).Google Scholar

52 See Pernice, Ingolf, La Rete Europea di Costituzionalità: Der Europäische Verfassungsverbund und die Netzwerktheorie, 70 Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht 63 (2010).Google Scholar

53 See Andreas Voßkuhle, The Cooperation Between European Courts: The Verbund of European Courts and its Legal Toolbox, in The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-Law - La Cour De Justice Et La Construction De L'europe: Analyses Et Perspectives De Soixante Ans De Jurisprudence 81, 81 (2013).Google Scholar

54 See Case C-50/00 P., Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council, 2002 E.C.R. I-6677; Regulation 766/2008, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 amending Council Regulation 515/97 on Mutual Assistance Between the Administrative Authorities of the Member States and Cooperation Between the Latter and the Commission to Ensure the Correct Application of the Law on Customs and Agricultural Matters, 2008 O.J. (L 218) 48, 48.Google Scholar

55 See Sweet, Alec Stone, A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe, 1 J. Global Constitutionalism 53, 63 (2012).Google Scholar

56 See generally Ingolf Pernice, Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union, 27 Eur. L. Rev. 511, 511 (2002); Constitutional Pluralism In The European Union And Beyond (Matej Avbelj & Jan Komárek eds., 2012).Google Scholar

57 Dellavalle, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

58 See generally Elizabeth Fisher, Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism (2007).Google Scholar

59 See Dellavalle, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

60 See Somek, , supra note 34.Google Scholar

61 See Schmidt-Assmann, Eberhard, Das Allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht Als Ordnungsidee 31 (2004).Google Scholar

62 See Sand, Inger-Johanne, Globalization and the Transcendence of the Public/Private Divide-What is Public Law Under Conditions of Globalization?, in After Public Law (Cormac Mac Amhlaigh, Claudio Michelon & Neil Walker eds., 2013).Google Scholar

63 See Andreas Voßkuhle, Neue Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft, in 1 Grundlagen Des Verwaltungsrechts (Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann & Andreas Voßkuhle eds., 2006); Gunnar Folke Schuppert, Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft als Steuerungswissenschaft: Zur Steuerung des Verwaltungshandelns durch Verwaltungsrecht, in Reform Des Allgemeinen Verwaltungsrechts 65, 65 (Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann & Gunnar Folke Schuppert eds., 1993).Google Scholar

64 See Maduro, Miguel Poiares, Bruno de Witte & Mattias Kumm eds., The Democratic Governance of the Euro, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), Policy Paper 2012/08 (2012), available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/23981/RSCAS_PP_2012_08.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar

65 See Glaser, Markus A., Internationale Verwaltungsbeziehungen 12 (2010).Google Scholar

66 See Craig, Paul, European Governance: Executive and Administrative Powers Under the New Constitutional Settlement, 3 Int'l J. Const. L. 407, 421 (2005).Google Scholar

67 See Dellavalle, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

68 Lyodtard, Jean-Francois, La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport Sur Le Savoir (1979).Google Scholar

69 Dellavalle, , supra note 6.Google Scholar

70 See id. Google Scholar